Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
The letter writer can't get the image of another guy licking his balls out of his head and is desperate to figure out a way for it to happen again. He's going to be devastated by Dan's answer because he was praying that Dan would say that he did have a duty to tell his wife, thereby opening the door to discussing it and ultimately recreating it.
Though I completely agree with #8. This guy totally wants another guy to lick his balls.
As Dan said, though, if you really, absolutely want nothing to do with any M-M contact, you need to be explicit about that upfront.
I don't see how the wife could be "upset" unless she's a raging homophobe. So your hubby's balls got licked, it's not like he was taking it on all fours.
God this letter was hilarious.
Straight guys are so funny. I know virtually no females - including those who identify as straight - who'd be freaked out by some incidental F2F touching or kissing during a 3-way. But some straight guys are hilarious about it, going to the most absurd contortions to avoid having so much as a hand brush a thigh. Guys, you're overthinking it. If it feels good, proceed.
Also, 15 FTW. I don't understand how a guy can cross the "include another guy in sex with my wife/gf" line, and still be freaked out about "the gay thing". The other dude is bangin your girl! Your balls being licked by the other dude while you're pounding her pussy is the least of your worries!
So 8 and 9, if you like your balls licked then please do so at your convenience. I hope you enjoy it to!
BALLS, you have no balls.
You are so right.
I've had several threesomes. MFM and FMF, and girls just don't do that shit. We don't. I mean, I'm bi, so it doesn't bother me, but I've had a threeway with a straight girl, and never once did she seem bothered by our tits touching, or whatever.
Dudes on the other hand... I will NEVER had another three way with two straight guys, or a straight guy and a bi guy. It was just SO awkward! They kept giving each other funny looks every time one guys hand touched the others, and it was so not fun. So nope. All bi, all the time from now on! Plus, watching guys make out is hot!
A likely story.
I think that, if a dude deliberately licks another dude's genitals during an MFM threesome, that dude is bi. Maybe just a little bi, mostly straight, but still, at least somewhat bi. Even if the scrotum being licked is in the middle of something quintessentially heterosexual (PIV sex), the act of male tongue on male genitals is not a heterosexual behavior.
The scales have fallen off'n mine eyes.
This sounds like a niche market need!
Want to have a MFM threesome?
Worry that your BALLS TOUCHING will turn you FAGULOUS?
FEAR NOT, the NO-TOUCH-BALL-SEPARATOR IS HERE!
This handy clear plastic liner has two sticky edges...just press along the inside of her legs, and it creates a flexible barrier between ass and vag so that you can fuck away without worrying if that accidental ball touch flipped the magic gay switch in your head. When you're finished, just peel off and, throw away!*
(*perfect use requires that a new liner must be used with every act of intercourse)
Maybe because I'm a girl who has the same fantasy, it seems obvious to me. The girl is on top (reverse cowgirl), leaning back, and the licker is crouched between everyone's legs.
BALLS says "Near the beginning of our encounter I was behind my wife doggy style while she gave him head. He crawled underneath and got into a 69 position with her..."
First, congrats on having such a hawt secks life and adventurous GF. I see I'm not the only one here wishing for photos (and video). Definitely one of the best SLLoDs ever.
Second, a few licks is no big deal. Now if the other guy started eating your ass like it was Christmas dinner, then you might have cause to think he might be g-a-y.
I agree that in a MFM, incidental contact (ala crossing swords) is to be expected. In our first go round, that occurred in several positions. My questions to Dan involved whether I had a duty to disclose, which I was reluctant to do as I didn't know how my wife would react to the news. You all may be interested to know that she's totally fine with it and is pleased to be topic A in today's SLLOTD.
It wasn't the fact that the act was repulsive, but rather that it was unexpected given our upfront disclosures.
Thank you for the clarification. I understand if the vibe from your first letter was unintentional- but the infraction just seemed so . . . trivial it just sounded like there was an ulterior motive in writing your letter. If you openly admit that "crossed swords" and the like have happened before- and in an obvious fashion- your wife's lack of issues with it the first time should have given you plenty of evidence that such a thing was no big deal. I felt like your worry of her reaction could have been a projection of your own insecurity from the episode.
Sorry for the misinterpretation. In any case this is a non-issue and there should be NO problem with disclosing this to your wife. Who knows- the nature of the situation may even turn her on.
But let's also take a moment (in between giggles) to note that non-consensual sex acts ARE NOT OKAY. Dan keeps going on and on about everyone being open and honest about your limits during sex (ESPECIALLY a three-way!) but that only works--and is only practically useful--if those limits are *respected* and putting the onus on the recipient to know what they must give advanced denial of (especially considering sex acts that, as with this guy, he had no effing idea were about to happen) is unreasonable, for both men AND women. Just respect each other--is that so hard? If the third wanted some M to M, there was nothing stopping him from murmuring, "I'm fine with some M to M if you're game" without getting this guy into potential trouble with his wife. Everyone is entitled to their own limits, however idiosyncratic they may be. So, Dan, good marks for acknowledging the guy was a victim, bad marks for saying it was his fault for not being clearer (even when "no M to M" was already part of the conversation. C+.
Also, really fascinating how some men 1) don't inhabit a cultural space where they perceive sexual contact as threatening; and 2) have a total mental block about being victims; and 3) externalize both 1 and 2 to worrying about the wife but insist it's all "eh" for them. Also really interesting how the commenters are so quick to mock even the idea that this man might have had something happen to him that he didn't want. Lots of subtle denial of sexual agency here, indeed! Fascinating shit, really...
"Savory taste of 'your' balls? This is officially the best LOTD ever! Hilarious first sentence, hilarious "panic-inducing" circumstances, hilarious "writer response". Please, don't ever change...
Yeah, I can't see how the guy on the bottom avoids getting his forehead slapped by the guy-on-top's balls. In fact, I was snorting with laughter at that point. Maybe it was a bit of self defense to lick his balls!
I see LW's joined in and explained himself in a bit more detail. Nice to see why you went into detail (although I think Dan's comment "Your balls were deliciously attacked, brutally tongue-bashed, by this dude." was making that same point others here did that perhaps you liked it more than you let on, etc etc). Glad everything worked out and the both of you are enjoying your "15 minutes" on the internet :)
As for the "secure enough in sexuality" bit, well I think if you get in a mixed sex three way yes you need to be prepared for SOME contact, even if undesired (I am *totally* with @30 in this context -- everyone I'm in on with had better enjoy enjoy everyone involved or it's just no fun). Thing is, I haven't seen Dan talk about anything other than all male threesomes, so I can't see that he's being hypocritical on that point.
Also, as it turns out, we found that having other people read about and comment on our silly sexual exploit to be quite stimulating.
As for you Doubting Thomases out there. Dan has seen the photographic evidence and read the emails setting up the encounter. It's all verified kids, big dick and all. Oh, and since my balls weren't hanging at the time (drawn up in the scrotum) they weren't banging on his forehead while he was underneath.
@39 & @44 - the description of your fantasy is precisely how position two was achieved, although it was at the edge of the bed, so not so much need for the licker to crouch down. "Try it" says the wife "you'll like it".
Because he can.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with 3-ways with boundaries, but if this is squishing you or your wife out, you guys have some major maturing to do before attempting another 3-way, if ever.
In my opinion...
If you book a vacation for Hedonism and the travel agent gives you tickets for Hedonism and when you step onto the resort you realize that you're not at Hedonism, but you are actually at the Jerry Falwell Bible College, you might be "taken out of the moment" as well. Lighten up Frau Blucher (damn, what's wrong with those horses?).
@62 Somebody's been playing Starcraft...
Well, just my point of view xD
Back in the day, when I read either Penthouse or Hustler magazine, I don't remember which, when reviewing porn movies they'd use a penis in varying stages of excitement to rate the flick. One completely flacid cock was, of course, a flop. Four hard cocks indicated a smash hit! I'd rate this letter four hard cocks!
I'd propose to Dan and the "tech-savy at risk youth" that they place penile indicators at the bottom of each letter, or in the comment section, so that we can vote!
But just in case, Mr. & Mrs BALLS, feel free to call...
But just in case, Mr. and Mrs. BALLS, feel free to call me...
Now how do we get those pics? Video? Will you post on youporn? Please? Let me tell you why... like your wife (and a couple of other posters), this particular act is my fantasy. But I can't find it by searching. Most porn is all about the guy... if it's MMF it's always about the DP, very little cunnilingus at all, and certainly not the position you describe (because it would gross the mostly male viewers out?). If it's MFF, and you find two women in a 69 while one is being boffed, the one one the bottom is usually waiting to suck the cock of the dude. She may be using her fingers on the top girl, but that's not what I want to see! When you search bi threesomes, you don't see this act either. So, I have three questions for you.
1) What do we call this act?
2) Where can I see it?
3) Would you please stop taunting us with "Dan has the pics" and start showing them already?
1. What do we call this act? I don't know what "we" call this act, but I call it licking your wife's clit while another guy is fucking her. But if you need a name for it, how about "fuckalingus"?
2. Where can you see it? Find one guy to fuck you and another guy to lick you at the same time and then look between your legs.
3. Would I please stop taunting us with "Dan has seen the pics" and start showing them already? Well, since you said please.....nah, not going to show them anyway. ggg what you are looking for are pics of me or the ball licker licking my wife's clit while she's getting fucked. Those specific pics don't exist. I'm not quite nimble enough to photograph myself clit licking while between four other legs, sorry.