BTW, I will laugh and laugh and laugh if this leads to a scandal big enough to get the law changed. Won't happen, but god, it would be awesome if it did.
"It's corrupt on the store side (capricious store managers who post signs like "Due to weather conditions we will not be opening on time, and we will be closing early if we do open"—because the customer doesn't really matter and has no other options anyway),"
I call bullshit on this statement. Could it possibly that the store manager stayed closed because they were considering their employee's safety? Not everyone works in the same neighborhood where they live. Most responsible employers tell their employees not to put their safety in danger trying to work when the roads are a mess.
Didn’t the voters speak? Why is it we are so whiling to follow the voters will when its something we agree with but not so whiling to follow the voters will when we don’t?
@6 I call bullshit on your bullshit. Frizelle's previous posts clearly indicated that the two stores who had "closed due to weather" notes in the front door also had employees INSIDE THE STORE at the time . . . so employees come to working risking life and limb or whatever, and the store is still "closed due to weather?" What the hell?!?!
Well, they should all be open today, hopefully for normal hours (I saw that the one on 12th is open on my way to work). I can understand Monday because the weather was deteriorating so quickly, and I can understand Tuesday because most of the roads were still fucked, and like @6 says, not everyone works in the same neighborhood where they live. But today? Roads look good, even most side streets, and with a few exceptions, most businesses are open as usual.
But really, Chris, don't slam on the store managers. Tons of local businesses closed early on Monday and/or did not open on Tuesday because travel conditions were so treacherous. If a store manager tells his employees to stay home out of concern for their safety, there is NOTHING wrong with that.
And yes, we (the state), can really use the money, even if you think it's being wasted.
Instead of sending your "friend" around to various stores to find out if they're open, you could use the state's handy web site for locating liquor stores, telling you their hours and providing you with a phone number by which you can contact them and find out if they're closed due to all the ice everywhere. And further, if you're particularly pissed off, you could call the district manager of the store and complain. Let's see how far that shit gets you with Costco.
Mr. Frizzelle, I would like to extend a cordial invitation for you to visit us in Canada, where the donuts are sweet, the health care is free, and the lickuh stores are plentiful, and run by compassionate individuals who would never, ever act like pussies and close early on account of the snow. (Everybody knows the only place you have to line up outside to get in is at Abercrombie & Fitch on Boxing Day.)
@12 Because retail stores have closing procedures, duh. Manager probably wanted to make sure they could get out of there as early as possible. They don't just go home immediately after the last customer walks out the door. Considering all the stories I heard of nightmare 8+ hour commutes on Monday night, I really don't blame them.
I'd also like to offer a big FUCK YOU to people claiming that this is no big deal when tomorrow is THANKSGIVING, when anyone stuck with relatives needs booze to stay sane and ALL state-run liquor stores are closed.
Fortunately, the Ballard store was open and well stocked yesterday, but I feel for people elsewhere in the city.
I should add that I do completely agree with your points about political and enforcement problems. If the whole system was reformed, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
O Canada, Canuck, where the citizenry is willing to fund government properly, not relying as we do here on liquor sales to plug otherwise unfillable holes in our state budget.
The initiatives failed in part because voters were scared losing state revenue. What about the liquor taxes that were lost because two stores were closed when people are buying for Thanksgiving and the open store in the neighborhood is sold out? Through incompetence (and a monopoly) the state is leaving tax money on the table.
You can't blame the unions - they are the agents for the employees, so of course they look out for their members.
But you don't have to agree with them either. And I say that as a union member.
What I think is funny is that if they privatized liquor store sales, a lot of the sales would probably still be done by unionized employees (QFC, Safeway, Albertsons) or sold by stores that have good working conditions in part to avoid the unions (Costco). Sure there would be the Wal-Marts, and the mom-and-pops, but the former is what it is, and the later would never be unionized anyway.
But the thing that really got to me in the anti-privatization campaign was how cheesy and paternalistic the ads were. Anytime they drag out "the children" to make a point, you know there's not much of a point to be made.
How does an inveterate alcoholic like Frizzelle not have well stocked stash? It's not like vodka is going to go bad. Put a case next to your earthquake emergency backpack.
If you think liquor laws here are fucked, try Pennsylavania. They have some truly fucked up laws, which change from county to county. In Pittsbrgh, you can't by a six pack of beer. You have to buy from a "distributor" and distributors can't sell less than a case at a time. In Altoona, you can't purchase more than 1 case at a time - although you can purchase a case, go put it in your car, go back in the store and purchase another one. Weird shit.
Look, I think our liquor sales should be privatized. I agree with your conclusions. I just think that the way you're getting there is laughable.
Yes, enforcement should be reformed. Yes, sales should be private. Yes, there's a way for the state not to lose revenue making these things happen.
But no, the fact that some liquor stores were closed during snowy days is not evidence of all of the above. If that's the strongest argument you have, I hope you stay out of the debate. There were plenty of private businesses that were closed the past couple of days, too. There's no guarantee that a private liquor store would have been open to serve you. Your argument is ridiculous, so you shouldn't be surprised that it's attracting ridicule.
For example:
It's corrupt on the store side (capricious store managers who post signs like "Due to weather conditions we will not be opening on time, and we will be closing early if we do open"—because the customer doesn't really matter and has no other options anyway)
You're presenting that as a systemic problem instead of something that happened to you one time. Not exactly compelling evidence of corruption.
And Fnarf, don't be a jackass. Just because somebody can smell a lame argument doesn't mean he's opposing the conclusions.
Agreed. After walking into a grocery store outside of Philly, looking around for 10 minutes trying to find the beer section, then being told "we don't sell that", THEN trying a gas station, THEN a mom-&-pop store, and finally being told "go to a bar", I have little to complain about when it comes to the considerably more reasonable system in WA.
@7 but see the stranger didn't agree with 'the voters' before they voted ( with very good and sound reason ), so why should they agree with them now..
.. and i don't agree with ' the voters' either. so i have my stash that i bought either on days when 'the voters' could care less about booze ( like the few days after halloween ) or get what i want form others who bootleg it up here when they visit we did this for years with absinthe and are likely to do it with aquavit . (did you know that the wslb routinely decides which liquors stores can stock or sell ? do the other 'voters' know this ?
@36 -- You're right. "Corrupt" is not the right word for what that sign exemplified. I need a word that means capriciousness plus power plus disregard for the people you are supposed to serve.
@30: Snowstorm? Seriously? The one that's been going on for THREE days? That one?
One of my friends made a similar pilgrimage. Apparently the line was ridiculous and people were kept outside despite the fact the store wasn't that crowded.: http://www.flickr.com/photos/md76/
The answer is hoarding! The only solution is to keep a fully stocked bar, with backup bottles of the key staples (whiskey, gin, vodka, rum) at all times. That way, should you encounter an unfortunate set of circumstances (unexpected guests, holidays, snow storms, the apocalypse) you are set.
@19, that's a funny one! Liquor stores in Seattle rarely answer their phone, which is why I was on that hike with two friends yesterday.
After we walked up to 23rd to find the store closed, we bought a ton of groceries at Trader Joe's and Madison Market, then my friend bought cigarettes at the Shell across from TJs, then we went to the store on 12th, which had a busy tone on its phone line and was closed, then I called Christopher from Nube Green (open), because I knew he had an interest in the subject, then we went to Broadway, where the scene was lively around 1:30 pm, bought bourbon, and walked home, stopping off for a drink at Liberty. So, that's five open businesses out of five on the non-liquor store side, and one open Cap Hill/CD liquor store out of three.
I'm left imagining the open, cheerful, creatively stocked liquor store a Capitol Hill resident is about to open in the wake of I-1100 passing, in an alternate universe. It would look something like this: http://www.fullthrottlebottles.com/
@38, you mean "pressure them" by voting to keep them in power, as you vigorously advocated? We'll send them a message by voting "no" on change? You're a sack of shit, Will.
It's one thing to be against 1100 for whatever reason, but it takes a special kind of fucklip to be against it and then pretend you're for it now.
I'll bet not a single 7-11 was closed. But then, they have an incentive to be open - if they don't sell stuff, someone else will.
But really, Frizzelle, you couldn't find an open bar on such a social occasion? It's the Snopocolypse! Even stranger-averse Seattlites let you in when they're all subjected to the same ridiculous inconvenience. My local was open (thank God!), and I've never seen it so social. You missed out, you drink-at-home drunk.
distribution trucks unable to get up capitol hill + a store (publicly OR privately owned) decides to close or open early or late during a (admittedly, relative to seattle) weather emergency = corruption, power abuse & disrespect?
Thanks for the giggle, SLOGger.
"Seriously, any adult in this day-and-age who doesn't have the presence of mind to maintain a reasonably well-stocked bar has only themselves to blame." + can't figure out how to go to a bar when everyone else could handle it no problem. = FTW. Stock your gawddamn bar, you uncouth anti-social loser. Or make friends with someone who knows how to stock a bar, and mooch off them / offer to buy a bottle from their home bar. It's. Not. Rocket. Science.
oh, and, while your political/policy points have validity,
Sorry about your bitterness about the whole democracy thing. Your horse lost. Deal.
Aren't there bigger fish to fry in the world? Anyone who wants to throw liquor store employees out of work should be thrown out of work themselves in today's economy and see how they like it. The system we have helps pay for the state government. And besides, I-1100 lost. The voters spoke. If you don't like government, try Somalia. And yes, I've been to East Africa.
36/Mike: There's no guarantee that a private liquor store would have been open to serve you.
No guarantee, sure. But if we had private liquor stores there would undoubtedly be many more of them than the number of state liquor stores, increasing the likelihood that one or more would have been open in the area where Frizzelle was.
53/Smell: Anyone who wants to throw liquor store employees out of work should be thrown out of work themselves in today's economy and see how they like it.
If Washington had an agency that strictly regulated everyone's sex life and there was a movement to abolish it and give people sexual freedom, you'd be arguing against it on the grounds that it would throw the sex cops out of work, that preserving their jobs was more important than individual choice and freedom.
53/Smell: Anyone who wants to throw liquor store employees out of work should be thrown out of work themselves in today's economy and see how they like it.
If Washington had an agency that strictly regulated everyone's sex life and there was a movement to abolish it and give people sexual freedom, you'd be arguing against it on the grounds that it would throw the sex cops out of work, that preserving their jobs was more important than individual choice and freedom.
I call bullshit on this statement. Could it possibly that the store manager stayed closed because they were considering their employee's safety? Not everyone works in the same neighborhood where they live. Most responsible employers tell their employees not to put their safety in danger trying to work when the roads are a mess.
But really, Chris, don't slam on the store managers. Tons of local businesses closed early on Monday and/or did not open on Tuesday because travel conditions were so treacherous. If a store manager tells his employees to stay home out of concern for their safety, there is NOTHING wrong with that.
And yes, we (the state), can really use the money, even if you think it's being wasted.
Instead of sending your "friend" around to various stores to find out if they're open, you could use the state's handy web site for locating liquor stores, telling you their hours and providing you with a phone number by which you can contact them and find out if they're closed due to all the ice everywhere. And further, if you're particularly pissed off, you could call the district manager of the store and complain. Let's see how far that shit gets you with Costco.
http://www.liq.wa.gov/homepageServices/s…
Fortunately, the Ballard store was open and well stocked yesterday, but I feel for people elsewhere in the city.
Death to the WSLCB.
BUY YER FUCKIN' LIKKER before THE GODDAMNED SNOWSTORM HITS.
Seriously, any adult in this day-and-age who doesn't have the presence of mind to maintain a reasonably well-stocked bar has only themselves to blame.
Now, time to pour another Bunnahabhain...
But you don't have to agree with them either. And I say that as a union member.
What I think is funny is that if they privatized liquor store sales, a lot of the sales would probably still be done by unionized employees (QFC, Safeway, Albertsons) or sold by stores that have good working conditions in part to avoid the unions (Costco). Sure there would be the Wal-Marts, and the mom-and-pops, but the former is what it is, and the later would never be unionized anyway.
But the thing that really got to me in the anti-privatization campaign was how cheesy and paternalistic the ads were. Anytime they drag out "the children" to make a point, you know there's not much of a point to be made.
OK let's stop right here. Raise your hand if you see the contradiction.
Unless you live near a dodgey Chinese takeaway. Then you can buy horrible wine at 3am.
Yes, enforcement should be reformed. Yes, sales should be private. Yes, there's a way for the state not to lose revenue making these things happen.
But no, the fact that some liquor stores were closed during snowy days is not evidence of all of the above. If that's the strongest argument you have, I hope you stay out of the debate. There were plenty of private businesses that were closed the past couple of days, too. There's no guarantee that a private liquor store would have been open to serve you. Your argument is ridiculous, so you shouldn't be surprised that it's attracting ridicule.
For example:
You're presenting that as a systemic problem instead of something that happened to you one time. Not exactly compelling evidence of corruption.
And Fnarf, don't be a jackass. Just because somebody can smell a lame argument doesn't mean he's opposing the conclusions.
Agreed. After walking into a grocery store outside of Philly, looking around for 10 minutes trying to find the beer section, then being told "we don't sell that", THEN trying a gas station, THEN a mom-&-pop store, and finally being told "go to a bar", I have little to complain about when it comes to the considerably more reasonable system in WA.
.. and i don't agree with ' the voters' either. so i have my stash that i bought either on days when 'the voters' could care less about booze ( like the few days after halloween ) or get what i want form others who bootleg it up here when they visit we did this for years with absinthe and are likely to do it with aquavit . (did you know that the wslb routinely decides which liquors stores can stock or sell ? do the other 'voters' know this ?
Just keep pressuring them to do SOMETHING instead of waiting for the next inevitable initiative.
@4 i also have had regular occasion to call christopher 'friend'
@30: Snowstorm? Seriously? The one that's been going on for THREE days? That one?
One of my friends made a similar pilgrimage. Apparently the line was ridiculous and people were kept outside despite the fact the store wasn't that crowded.: http://www.flickr.com/photos/md76/
http://www.hulu.com/watch/4163/saturday-…
After we walked up to 23rd to find the store closed, we bought a ton of groceries at Trader Joe's and Madison Market, then my friend bought cigarettes at the Shell across from TJs, then we went to the store on 12th, which had a busy tone on its phone line and was closed, then I called Christopher from Nube Green (open), because I knew he had an interest in the subject, then we went to Broadway, where the scene was lively around 1:30 pm, bought bourbon, and walked home, stopping off for a drink at Liberty. So, that's five open businesses out of five on the non-liquor store side, and one open Cap Hill/CD liquor store out of three.
I'm left imagining the open, cheerful, creatively stocked liquor store a Capitol Hill resident is about to open in the wake of I-1100 passing, in an alternate universe. It would look something like this: http://www.fullthrottlebottles.com/
It's one thing to be against 1100 for whatever reason, but it takes a special kind of fucklip to be against it and then pretend you're for it now.
Slip and fall, Will, slip and fall.
But really, Frizzelle, you couldn't find an open bar on such a social occasion? It's the Snopocolypse! Even stranger-averse Seattlites let you in when they're all subjected to the same ridiculous inconvenience. My local was open (thank God!), and I've never seen it so social. You missed out, you drink-at-home drunk.
distribution trucks unable to get up capitol hill + a store (publicly OR privately owned) decides to close or open early or late during a (admittedly, relative to seattle) weather emergency = corruption, power abuse & disrespect?
Thanks for the giggle, SLOGger.
"Seriously, any adult in this day-and-age who doesn't have the presence of mind to maintain a reasonably well-stocked bar has only themselves to blame." + can't figure out how to go to a bar when everyone else could handle it no problem. = FTW. Stock your gawddamn bar, you uncouth anti-social loser. Or make friends with someone who knows how to stock a bar, and mooch off them / offer to buy a bottle from their home bar. It's. Not. Rocket. Science.
oh, and, while your political/policy points have validity,
Sorry about your bitterness about the whole democracy thing. Your horse lost. Deal.
No guarantee, sure. But if we had private liquor stores there would undoubtedly be many more of them than the number of state liquor stores, increasing the likelihood that one or more would have been open in the area where Frizzelle was.
53/Smell: Anyone who wants to throw liquor store employees out of work should be thrown out of work themselves in today's economy and see how they like it.
If Washington had an agency that strictly regulated everyone's sex life and there was a movement to abolish it and give people sexual freedom, you'd be arguing against it on the grounds that it would throw the sex cops out of work, that preserving their jobs was more important than individual choice and freedom.
Love this. Genius.