As I remember, the little boy in the novel is an unwitting carrier of an explosive device, not an idiotic terrorist who only wound up blowing himself up.
"Their leaders and recruiters can be lethally subtle and manipulative, but the quiet truth is that many of the deluded foot soldiers are foolish and untrained, perhaps even untrainable. Acknowledging this fact could help us tailor our counterterrorism priorities."
Everybody should have seen "Four Lions" when it played here recently. A dark comedy about hapless terrorists and sadly prescient about this bombing. Rent it when you can.
These fellows are not failures. Their mission is terror, not bombing, and while their efforts to detonate bombs were pathetic they succeeded beyond their wildest dreams at creating terror. Who is the idiot here, the guy who can't detonate his bomb properly or the people who willingly give up all their freedoms in response?
The shoe bomber, the underpants bomber, the Portland guy -- these were all SUCCESSFUL terrorist acts.
"Their leaders and recruiters can be lethally subtle and manipulative, but the quiet truth is that many of the deluded foot soldiers are foolish and untrained, perhaps even untrainable. Acknowledging this fact could help us tailor our counterterrorism priorities."
Portland's KBOO hosted a review that covered this theme pretty nicely, I think. http://www.kboo.fm/node/25340
"They shot the right man, but the wrong man blew up."
The shoe bomber, the underpants bomber, the Portland guy -- these were all SUCCESSFUL terrorist acts.