she says she's a 'fool', but he's 'a jerk'. i'm left thinking that's she's both. she thinks that she gets to be stupid while he's supposed to be responsible for all of them. foolish jerk wants to blame guy for her hurt when she should be packing up her shit and moving on. that's what she gets..her just desserts.
She was a jerk to herself, he was a jerk to her. They were both jerks to his wife, but that cancels out in the comparison between him and her. The rub is that none of this jerkiness negatively affects the guy.
I think you should contact his wife when she gets back (at least send an email). Chances are she knows nothing of this. It will be revenge in one way, sure, but that's incidental. What's important is that if you have any diseases, she will be exposed to them, and she deserves to be able to make the decision whether to continue the marriage or break it off.
He was a jerk, you were a fool. Who cares whose is bigger? The objective now is damage control for her and counseling for you. The relationship is not going to continue, regardless of who was dumber. But it sounds like you have some major issues and you should take care of that, too.
I am sorry, but this woman makes me want to puke. She has nobody but herself to blame. And yes, from my stand point, she is the fool. She knew what she was doing and did it anyway. How would she like it if she was the one called up to serve and her husband found another woman while she was gone? She wouldn't!
Oh also she deserves to know that her husband is a cheating POS, and if she is ever deployed again this will happen again. Not might or could, it WILL.
I'm hoping that when Sad Eyes says that moved in a few days later, what she really meant was that she moved some stuff over and basically spent all her time there but didn't give up her own apartment. Because as shitty as what she did was, if he tossed her out on the street without any notice, that would be even a shittier thing to do. But I honestly assumed she kept her own apartment until Dan suggested otherwise.
You gotta feel for his wife. "Yeah honey, have fun putting your fucking life on the line in the middle of the desert. I'll just be here fucking the shit out of the first girl I meet at a bar". He sounds like a real catch.
I know this doesn't count for anything because no one with 2 brain cells is actually supposed to believe it, but the guy did mislead her with some bullshit saying that he and his wife wouldn't still be together after the deployment (they weren't going to make it). Therefore that lie to get someone into bed does make him a jerk on a higher order.
Now see, if they truly read Savage Love, they'd have known to open up their relationship for her deployment, loverboy would have been honest with barslut from the get-go, and she would have been sending in a letter telling us how well it all worked...Oy, Dan, your children, they don't listen so well...
@11, 14: You seriously think the wife wasn't getting plenty of her own on tour? I'd be willing to bet that the wife's a jerk too. Sounds like one giant jerk cesspool to me.
Whoever is the fool or the bigger jerk, neither of them made any effort to communicate and set boundaries for their relationship, so I have a hard time sympathizing with either of them. If he's going to be all "woe is me, I need companionship while my wife is gone", he should've been clear, up front, that he had no intention of leaving his wife. If she's going to move in with him and willingly be his emotional outlet, she should've been clear about her feelings the minute she started to fall in love with him. But no one said anything, and now here we are commenting on her mopey letter. Fools and jerks, both of them.
@23 you'd be willing to bet the wife is a jerk based on what evidence? That the letter-writer thinks the wife knew? That good people never end up marrying assholes? Is there something inherent to female soldiers that renders them incapable of fidelity? Do enlighten us.
My response? Because calling him an even bigger jerk is the only way you can feel even slightly better about your shitty self? Knock yourself out, lady.
Great response, Dan. Yes, I'd say dude is the bigger jerk here. Fucker couldn't even wait 24 hours to cheat?? Does the asshole even have a conscience? Apparently not. Some love & devotion he has for his wife. And she's a pathetic idiot who must have serious self-esteem issues to put herself in that situation. What a mess these two are!
Look, I'm about the least pro-army person out there and I couldn't care less about patriotism, but cheating with the spouse of a deployed soldier still feels like damn low on the moral scale to me.
Clearly they're both jerks, but I'd give him a reduction on his jerk score by virtue of being in an extreme situation, so yeah, she's the bigger jerk.
Typical military base whoring, trying to be all soft focus romantic.
I grew up near Bellevue, NE, which was the headquarters for the Strategic Air Command, and this sort of thing goes on all the time (when they aren't at church, that is)
When I met Mr. Vel-DuRay, he had a tract house in a subdivision down south of Puyallup, full of military and cops. They all slept around with each other. It was like "Peyton Place" with tacky people and ugly clothes.
It sounds like they had a good ride. But it's time to get off.
He's a jerk to her & his wife; she's a jerk to his wife and a fool with him. If we're measuring only jerkosity, it may be that he wins. If we're measuring overall stupidity (and let's not forget the utter lack of communication) then I think others have pretty well pointed out that they're neck and neck (but no longer necking, har har oh I slay myself *rolls eyes*).
seandr, forgiving someone seems to imply that there is something to forgive, which is an implicit recognition that there was jerkishness.
One can forgive a jerk, but they remain jerks whether you forgive them or not.
That said, I agree that neither are jerks. Both are self-centred scumbags and, frankly, I hope they both die of some loathsome VD they swapped back and forth (and the wife doesn't catch) and the wife is able to retire from the military on the life insurance proceeds.
My 2 cents, I think the barslut (thanks, Canuck :-) should get herself tested, and, if she turns up positive, she should report that to her ex-loverboy.
In order to stop the Peyton Place merry-go-round, she should not call the wife, but should move on with her own life as well as she can. From the fact that she's not whining about being homeless, my guess is that she had some options. (Bars are open at all hours, so maybe she had found the next free-ride before she got around to writing this letter.)
But, Canuck, I think in your scenario, the wife might be better off, and loverboy would be better off, and the two of them might go on to have a nice life together. But I don't see barslut as acting any differently. She still moves in with loverboy, still thinks she can woo him away from his wife, and is still dumped unceremoniously on her ear at the end of the year. Do you really envision the wife supporting barslut in her house once she returns home?
She "knew" he was married, yet she consented to sleep with him anyway? What kind of human being justifies that to themselves and believes it's a-okay?
If' I were single, met a nice, interested guy who was married, I'd say, take care of that issue before you drag me through it. C-ya when you're single.
@23 Way to make assumptions for which you have no absolutely no basis. You know what they say about people who assume? They make an ass out of you - just you, in this instance. On behalf of all women who have been cheated on: Fuck off.
I disagree with whoever said to tell the wife. Telling the wife, rationalizations aside, serves no purpose but to hurt her, get the husband in trouble for hurting her, and make Sad Eyes feel better in the end. So basically, it's just another opportunity for the homewrecker to shit on the wife. But here's a theory that's as plausible as any other: The wife is going overseas and knows there's a chance her husband will cheat, and realizes he will be lonely while she's gone, and offers him a deal. He can find someone, but not just pick up random sluts left and right, but she doesn't want to know about it if he does. And when she gets back, they both go on as if she never left, and ignore whatever might have or probably did happen. This might work, but only through sheer force of will on the wife's part. She will have to ignore all evidence left behind that 2 people lived in her house. She will have to stop neighbors from mentioning her husband's overnight guest. She will have to probably tell all of their friends that she doesn't want to know anything they might think she should know. But a phone call from a woman saying "I fucked your husband in your bed for 9 months" would be too much, and would rob her of the ability to pretend it never happened.
Don't call the wife. Doing that makes you the biggest jerk possible. It's a deliberate and premeditated form of assholery. It makes you a cunt, if you aren't already just for fucking a married guy in his wife's bed for 9 months.
Pretty lame. This is how NOT to do non-monogamy. The way this should have worked, is SE meets the guy, he boo-hoos about his wife's deployment, he says he has the wife's okay to have a girlfriend, SE has a conversation with said wife wherein she discovers whether or not he's a lying CPOS, then she accepts that she is a temporary live-in and will be moving out when the spouse's deployment ends.
But that requires everyone to act like a fucking grownup, tell the truth, and talk to one another, which apparently is much too difficult for these people.
I have no sympathy for SE (I consider it the secondary's responsibility to make sure the primary is okay with the relationship), but it's the husband that's most at fault if he was cheating AND lying to SE about it being cheating - he managed to be a complete dick to both of them.
I pretty much assume any married guy in a situation like this is cheating. You run into them all the time online - the guys who call themselves poly, claim they have an open marriage, but they can only see you on weekdays, and you can't ever meet at his house or call him at home. Um, yeah. CPOS.
As someone in the Military, who is leaving the military after a year in Afghanistan.
I'm not surprised. The wife never knew, her husband was probably skypeing with her while she was away. Shit like this happens all the time. Since it was a 9 month deployment, it means more than likely if it was an Army spouse the service member was in the reserves, which means that for 3 months prior, he had been preparing for her to leave. Shit was planned from Day 1 and that Tag Chaser turned home wrecker knew. Glad to see her ass got canned. Hopefully he will have his year ruined as well. He deserves it.
@39 Well. EricaP, junior wives would have their advantages, but....nah, that's not what I was thinking. I just meant in a perfect world, if they actually absorbed what they read here, there would have been full disclosure and communication. Loverboy and wife would have had an honest discussion about the challenges of being separated for 9 months, and would have either chosen full monogamy, in which case he wouldn't have been trawling in a bar the night she left, or they would have decided to open things up and play safe. Barslut would have known the score from the start, that there was no future, just a NSA romp for 9 months. Loverboy would not have let her move in, IMHO, as I think that goes beyond acceptable boundaries for even an open relationship (but what do I know about these things?), and it would have meant she still had her own place at the end. If she didn't like the arrangement, she would have been free to walk. However, Barslut is loving the drama, the "luuurve," the "Oooo, he'll leave his wife for meeee." Sistah is slightly unrealistic, but then, many of our tribe are.
As an aside, I remember reading in one of Dan's books a part where his brother Bill describes his open relationship, and how, sometimes, a woman will lose interest when he lets her know his girlfriend is fine with it. It was only appealing when it was thought to be illicit.
As a woman involved with an Air Force man, this makes me more than a little ill. Also, many of the bases I've been on are pretty small town (I'm assuming the husband and wife were living off-base), so I'm sure there would be a lot of talk. I can't imagine that no one came to him and told him that what he was doing was going to affect not just him, but also the wife's career, especially if he was bringing "barslut" on base to the Commissary or the Exchange. I'll admit, I thought the main problem was the "tag chasers" for the military men. Even if the couple had opened their relationship for the duration of her deployment, bringing her back to their house is just the lowest. Also, agree with everyone telling her not to call the wife, it's just hurtful. If she remains in the military, she'll probably have a health screening pretty soon, and she may already know, but to call her and tell her is just cruel.
@50 - how can you believe it DOESN'T? Everything they both did was deliberate. They weighed their options and CHOSE to fuck people over. Which is something I can say I've never done, and never will.
I don' t know whats more surprising - that these kind of people exist or that they exist AND read Savage Love AND write Dan (I think) expecting some sympathetic response.
@48 "In a perfect world... loverboy would not have let her move in" - yes, I agree that would have helped matters a lot. Also, if he saw barslut / Sad Eyes less often, and perhaps found another girlfriend too, to help remind Sad Eyes that this wasn't a "forever" kind of relationship... You can't eliminate all pain & suffering, but these steps would help if you wanted to do open relationships ethically (which neither of them did, in this case, but, you know, IF).
No. She is the bigger jerk, for writing this letter in which she calls herself "Sad Eyes". Girlfriend, your eyes should be sad, you just enabled the shit out of a totally reckless cheater while his wife was off on one of the toughest work assignments in the world.
Also, moving in with anyone, ever, a few days after meeting in a bar? Are you shitting me??? No good can come of that. I do not feel bad for this woman getting tossed out on her ass, I mean, where the hell was she living beforehand? Did she just break her lease to shack up with this married jerk, in the home he shares with his wife?
Yes, the guy is also a massive douche, but "Sad Eyes"* is responsible for not recognizing his blatant line of bullshit,
depending on him for a place to live, and helping him cheat on his wife.
I know how this is supposed to work - some lonely and desperate people are trotted on stage, their misdeeds enumerated, and the simian audience dutifully grunts and bellows its disapproval.
I was just trying to switch things up a bit, but never mind. He jerk! She jerk! Seandr mad at jerk!
50 - Not saying you're wrong, but, just to understand better, what would either of them have to do to meet your criteria for being a jerk? And do you see any evidence in the letter of either them being basically a good person, or is that just an assumption you generally make?
@57: I'm with you. What human being lives an entire life without reacting poorly to loneliness and desperation? At least once? Some lucky ass motherfuckers, that's who. These people are clearly miserable already; lashing them to the post so the public can torture and taunt them is SOOO Scarlet Letter. I keep thinking we live in the future just because we have iphones and shiny shit...
My scorecard is incomplete. Neither of them is going to want to put the beginning of the relationship on their resume should either apply to get into heaven. She assumed he'd leave his wife for her; he assumed she'd just leave when the time came without difficulties - honours seem about even there. She emerges hurt and he presumably doesn't. But then again, she planned and intended active harm to an innocent party. He's certainly crossed the line (unless this whole episode is just a twisted version for the couple of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?), but exactly how far over the line he went we and SE can't say.
The question and how it's framed are interesting. Is that really the most or only "useful" point about which she can ask for clarification?
Sure, we've all been lonely from time to time. But how many of us would actively do something we KNOW would destroy the one person we claim to love most in the world without hesitation? To satisfy OUR OWN immediate base needs, which could be met otherwise for a short time. Who treats people like this??? Someone who's not capable of love, that's who.
Decent people with some kind of ethical grounding stop themselves before acting because that's what it means to love another person. They get a dog while the spouse is away, stick close to friends, get a sex toy, etc, out of LOVE for the other person. Furthermore, we're not just talking about a guy who had a drunken one-night indiscretion with "Sad Eyes" (@56, you're awesome), which could almost be forgiven. Bitch immediately moved in for 9 MONTHS taking wifey's place and he was down with the whole thing. Just 24 HOURS after the wife was shipped out to war.
Ladies and gentlemen, now that's what we call a sociopath, and if you can't see that, then you are fatally broken as well.
60 - You have a point, although part of why I'm not inclined favourably towards her is that, while you don't like people embroidering scarlet Js for them, isn't that basically what she's trying to do for him?
@42- A jerk is a person. Or it's a sharp movement. Stop being a pedantic jerk. You have no right to forgive anyone involved in this story unless you are something more than an observer. Even when you forgive someone, you forgive them for being a jerk.
Maybe they can stop being jerks, but the characters in this story are complete asswipes and there's no reason not to call a spade a spade.
@66, Oh man, I wasn't for her calling up the wife and telling her, but you are so right. When you are kicked out with no warning, of course you're liable to "forget" a bra in some random drawer... Ha, that will make for a fun interrogation scene, when the wife runs across it!
@57, I'm with you too. I just don't see how it helps anyone (even SE, despite her request) to argue about who's really to blame.
They made lots of mistakes. Both of them were inconsiderate of his wife's feelings. They failed to communicate in any meaningful way. He may have lied about his relationship status and direction. She shouldn't have moved in so early, and he should have given her more warning before kicking her out.
But to me, it sounds like they were both just really bad at finding what they were looking for. They need to learn from their mistakes so they don't hurt anyone else (or themselves) again, not be crucified for them.
@49 and others: If I was in the wife's shoes, I would much rather be told, and deal with the emotional fallout, then to not be told and suddenly wake up and find that I have AIDS. Non-disclosure isn't just immoral, it's potentially lethal. I don't care how much drama it causes; the wife has a right to know.
@69 - SE can get tested first, and see what the damage is. If there's no disease, then do you agree there's no reason to tell? And, after all, the guy can also get tested, and owes more of a responsibility to his wife to do so. (If I were in the wife's shoes, and had been away for nine months, I'd go with my guy to get both of us tested -- trust but verify, isn't that the saying?)
@64: You have no right to forgive anyone involved in this story unless you are something more than an observer.
I see. So we all have the right -- no, the obligation! -- to condemn these people even though none of us is involved in this story. But forgiveness? That's crossing the line.
Hmmm, let me consult some outside sources on that...Well what do you know, it turns you were right. There it is exactly as you said in chapter one of The Angry Mob's Ethical Handbook.
Yeah, I don't feel sorry for this stupid bitch at all. You preyed on him at a bar. You moved in with him, but never discussed the future. You're a bitch and you're stupid. You deserve to cry all by yourself.
I don't feel sorry for either of them either (especially if she didn't actually move in with him and get kicked out completely out of the blue), but in my book the attached party is always the bigger jerk than the piece on the side. He had a commitment to uphold; she did not. Gender has nothing to do with it-- it could just as easily have gone the other way.
is it that hard to find a single guy?? call me old fashioned, but i think that once you hear "married" you find someone else. I think they are both jerks, but WALK away from the married one...if they cheat on the current spouse they will cheat on you. Seriously, do you people not READ dan savage????
If Barslut was really living there, and not just a booty call, the wife is going to find out sooner rather than later. Because in the world of military housing, the only thing the stay-at-homes love more than nosing into everyone's business is telling everyone what they know. So, once the news gets back to wife, and she kicks POS husband out, he and barslut can be roomies once again. You know, because they are in loooooooooovvvvvvve.
WOW...I know that I just skimmed the comments, but seriously? No one in 78 comments has referenced Robert John's song? 1979 hit, "Sad Eyes" ? I thought the letter was a fake! She basically lifts lines from the song!
I think I smell a fake - moving someone in to your house in these circumstances? Never going to be able to keep that a secret even if they're not in forces accommodation.
It seems like it would be fake, but my husband's in the military and I can't tell you how many times guys have returned home or pulled into a port call and contacted wives to find their shit moved out and their bank account empty.
Yeah, people get lonely and deployments suck. After a day, though? If people can't handle long separations, they really shouldn't marry/get seriously involved with people in the military. I've lived through my share of deployments and don't find anything sympathetic about either of these bottomfeeders. It's tough, but it's not the end of the world; you get time to do all those hobbies and interests your spouse hates, you hang out with friends a lot, you visit the spouse if you can, and you get on with life.
shorter seander @57 and prior: I have decency and forgiveness in my heart, and we should not judge the folks in the letter by their loathsome actions. But if you disagree with me you're a grunting, bellowing simian.
Cognitive Dissonance R Us seems to be open for business today.
I think if you consider just the two of them, she's the bigger jerk. She preyed on him when he was vulnerable, she tried to ruin his marriage, and now she's trying to make him look like the bad guy.
However, if you consider the wife as well, then he "wins" at being the bigger jerk for what he's done to her. (Assuming they didn't talk this through and she okayed it, which, given his overall level of communication, seems extremely unlikely.)
The wife went to a place where she might well have been shot dead and he had nothing better to do than cheat on her, within DAYS of her leaving, and then move the other woman into their married home and sleep with her in their bed.
And he kept her around until the very day the wife came back! He was going to have sex with his wife in that bed within 24 hours of having sex in it with a would-be home-wrecker. Was he even going to change the sheets?
Honestly, I hope the wife kicks HIM out of the house now--since she's the one in the military, I'm assuming the base housing would be hers? He can get back together with SE, for all I care. They deserve each other.
I would like to add, as a former military man, this sort of thing is quite common. Way back to my technical training, after basic, married men and women, who where away from their families retraining with us newbies, started up relationships with their fellow trainees. (Usually married men would pick up young women, fresh from basic training)
I am waiting for the usual commentators to say that we should consider the high probability that, despite the letter's contents, it is *really* the wife's failure to do X,Y and Z (e.g., house chores, connect emotionally, lick dick in *precisely* the way he wants) is the reason the man cheated. After all, if he felt unfulfilled, obviously he had to find sex outside the marriage due to his distress.
After all, whenever a woman does something like that, it is the man's fault for not doing X, Y and Z, right? Right?
Ugh. There seems to have been a slew of letters to Dan lately from people who are DELUSIONAL. Here, does it really matter who's the greater fool or jerk? They're both stupid. She apparently can't find anybody else to fuck but jumps to help him out at this tragic time in his life. Yeah, yeah ... /sarcasm.
And he's so traumatized by being left by wifey, instead of worrying about how she's handling being deployed, sleeping in a tent with baby rats scrabbling at night or in a converted metal container, being run ragged (all of which one of my good friends in the Reserves went through recently, so I'm not exaggerating), he's wondering how he'll pull through.
She should have backed off as soon as he laid his sob story on her. What did she expect when dealing with someone reeking of desperation and immaturity. And did his wife not take a laptop with her? They could have been communicating back and forth every night, keeping their relationship active.
Instead, the LW does the stupidest thing possible and falls in love with him. Mind you, he was an idiot and a coward to not have reminded her that this was, after all, a temporary situation. But I guess he feared she might storm off and then, poor baby, he'd be cut off from sex ... uh ... companionship again. So he didn't. But I can see the wife's return schedule being slightly nebulous, though it's no excuse for him. When service personnel are returning to the States, they may be given a window but may not know until the last minute the exact flight details.
She was desperate.
He was desperate.
They're both equal jerks.
It's stories like this that lead me to conclude that the most surefire obstacle to getting laid is integrity.
How do you sort through this chaos? Dude's wife hasn't even landed abroad yet and he's already moving his interim fuck toy in? He chucks her-with no fanfare or warning--the day of his wife's return? What a catch.
And, seriously, how entwined a combination of low self-esteem, romantic desperation, poor judgment and gullibility must you have to move in after a few days with a dude you met at a bar who turned his "my wife just left for war" into a fucking pick-up line? What a moron.
Profoundly depressing. The selfish and stupid have all the fun, even while wallowing in their pathetic self-created melodramas. True loneliness, love and compassion eludes them. Pathetic.
@86: I've refused to condemn these people, and I've mocked the angry mob of judges who condemn people for sport (and, as it turns out, quickly turn on anyone who refuses to join them).
@89 - I like how you make digs from behind your wall of non-registry, non-consistent-name. What exactly are you referring to in your passive aggressive way? When a woman cheats on her husband because he's not giving her orgasms? Has that ever even been discussed in recent Slog history? The last woman cheater got slammed by the crowd because she dragged her man to therapy to make it about his problems when she was the cheater. Where are all these men getting blamed for their wives cheating? Or do you mean men get blamed for being bad lovers when their wives shut down and stop liking sex?
"the most surefire obstacle to getting laid is integrity."
Maddy81 @91.
The PUAs would agree with you, at least.
If it's true, then might the reason be that a lot of people, when wanting to get laid, also want to be lied to, the way that people go to the theatre to enjoy something that they know isn't real? Or because it makes things easier on their consciences as they go and do what they wanted to do anyways?
@48 It's probably not just the illicit notion, but the "specialness" notion. "I'm so amazing, that he'll actually betray his marriage vows for me. ... What? He can have sex with just about anyone he wants to? Oh, well, that's... not very special at all!"
@91 Yeah, also that. The scumbags/losers/imbeciles I've known have been the ones to spend the least amount of time single.
I think its a bit semantic as to the difference between they can't make it or he can't make it. It only takes one person to break up a relationship, as relationships require 2 people to be in them. Regardless, he was taking responsibility for breaking up the relationship in my opinion when he was going to bars telling women he can't make it, so here I am ladies! I think its a little harsh of dan to be saying she was authoring the wife's misery and preying on the guy. She didn't decide hey I'm gonna break them up, the husband TOLD her he was breaking it up. The only reason we don't have more sympathy for her is simply because its such an old and overused lie we don't even consider it dishonest anymore. Anyone who listens to a married man saying they're done with their wife is automatically an idiot for believing it. Thus society doesn't hold married men accountable for saying this line anymore. But I still do, so I believe he's the bigger jerk.
Please wait...
and remember to be decent to everyone all of the time.
Even with that change, I'd still say she was the bigger.
I also have a hard time imagining even the most open-minded spouse being okay with the other man/woman sleeping/fucking in the marital bed.
then you are a sociopath
He was a jerk, you were a fool. Who cares whose is bigger? The objective now is damage control for her and counseling for you. The relationship is not going to continue, regardless of who was dumber. But it sounds like you have some major issues and you should take care of that, too.
Scream it from the rafters.
DON'T
MARRY
YOUR
WHORE
Coming to Kindle soon.
Copyright, J. Bailo, 2010,2011 All rights reserved.
@17 Apparently, of yourself.
Clearly they're both jerks, but I'd give him a reduction on his jerk score by virtue of being in an extreme situation, so yeah, she's the bigger jerk.
I grew up near Bellevue, NE, which was the headquarters for the Strategic Air Command, and this sort of thing goes on all the time (when they aren't at church, that is)
When I met Mr. Vel-DuRay, he had a tract house in a subdivision down south of Puyallup, full of military and cops. They all slept around with each other. It was like "Peyton Place" with tacky people and ugly clothes.
It sounds like they had a good ride. But it's time to get off.
I forgive your snarky reply in advance.
One can forgive a jerk, but they remain jerks whether you forgive them or not.
That said, I agree that neither are jerks. Both are self-centred scumbags and, frankly, I hope they both die of some loathsome VD they swapped back and forth (and the wife doesn't catch) and the wife is able to retire from the military on the life insurance proceeds.
In order to stop the Peyton Place merry-go-round, she should not call the wife, but should move on with her own life as well as she can. From the fact that she's not whining about being homeless, my guess is that she had some options. (Bars are open at all hours, so maybe she had found the next free-ride before she got around to writing this letter.)
But, Canuck, I think in your scenario, the wife might be better off, and loverboy would be better off, and the two of them might go on to have a nice life together. But I don't see barslut as acting any differently. She still moves in with loverboy, still thinks she can woo him away from his wife, and is still dumped unceremoniously on her ear at the end of the year. Do you really envision the wife supporting barslut in her house once she returns home?
She "knew" he was married, yet she consented to sleep with him anyway? What kind of human being justifies that to themselves and believes it's a-okay?
If' I were single, met a nice, interested guy who was married, I'd say, take care of that issue before you drag me through it. C-ya when you're single.
Don't call the wife. Doing that makes you the biggest jerk possible. It's a deliberate and premeditated form of assholery. It makes you a cunt, if you aren't already just for fucking a married guy in his wife's bed for 9 months.
and just what on Earth leads you to believe this
when you betray and use those closest to you you are a grade A asshole, not a good person
But that requires everyone to act like a fucking grownup, tell the truth, and talk to one another, which apparently is much too difficult for these people.
I have no sympathy for SE (I consider it the secondary's responsibility to make sure the primary is okay with the relationship), but it's the husband that's most at fault if he was cheating AND lying to SE about it being cheating - he managed to be a complete dick to both of them.
I pretty much assume any married guy in a situation like this is cheating. You run into them all the time online - the guys who call themselves poly, claim they have an open marriage, but they can only see you on weekdays, and you can't ever meet at his house or call him at home. Um, yeah. CPOS.
I'm not surprised. The wife never knew, her husband was probably skypeing with her while she was away. Shit like this happens all the time. Since it was a 9 month deployment, it means more than likely if it was an Army spouse the service member was in the reserves, which means that for 3 months prior, he had been preparing for her to leave. Shit was planned from Day 1 and that Tag Chaser turned home wrecker knew. Glad to see her ass got canned. Hopefully he will have his year ruined as well. He deserves it.
As an aside, I remember reading in one of Dan's books a part where his brother Bill describes his open relationship, and how, sometimes, a woman will lose interest when he lets her know his girlfriend is fine with it. It was only appealing when it was thought to be illicit.
Do you judge your own character based only on your lowest moments?
Also, moving in with anyone, ever, a few days after meeting in a bar? Are you shitting me??? No good can come of that. I do not feel bad for this woman getting tossed out on her ass, I mean, where the hell was she living beforehand? Did she just break her lease to shack up with this married jerk, in the home he shares with his wife?
Yes, the guy is also a massive douche, but "Sad Eyes"* is responsible for not recognizing his blatant line of bullshit,
depending on him for a place to live, and helping him cheat on his wife.
*seriously, "Sad Eyes"??? seriously???
I know how this is supposed to work - some lonely and desperate people are trotted on stage, their misdeeds enumerated, and the simian audience dutifully grunts and bellows its disapproval.
I was just trying to switch things up a bit, but never mind. He jerk! She jerk! Seandr mad at jerk!
The question and how it's framed are interesting. Is that really the most or only "useful" point about which she can ask for clarification?
Sure, we've all been lonely from time to time. But how many of us would actively do something we KNOW would destroy the one person we claim to love most in the world without hesitation? To satisfy OUR OWN immediate base needs, which could be met otherwise for a short time. Who treats people like this??? Someone who's not capable of love, that's who.
Decent people with some kind of ethical grounding stop themselves before acting because that's what it means to love another person. They get a dog while the spouse is away, stick close to friends, get a sex toy, etc, out of LOVE for the other person. Furthermore, we're not just talking about a guy who had a drunken one-night indiscretion with "Sad Eyes" (@56, you're awesome), which could almost be forgiven. Bitch immediately moved in for 9 MONTHS taking wifey's place and he was down with the whole thing. Just 24 HOURS after the wife was shipped out to war.
Ladies and gentlemen, now that's what we call a sociopath, and if you can't see that, then you are fatally broken as well.
Maybe they can stop being jerks, but the characters in this story are complete asswipes and there's no reason not to call a spade a spade.
I bet she ended up leaving some of her bits and pieces behind, that the wife later found.
I pretty much agree with Dan. Both of these people are losers, but the guy (barely) gets the edge in jerkiness because of the no warning eviction.
They made lots of mistakes. Both of them were inconsiderate of his wife's feelings. They failed to communicate in any meaningful way. He may have lied about his relationship status and direction. She shouldn't have moved in so early, and he should have given her more warning before kicking her out.
But to me, it sounds like they were both just really bad at finding what they were looking for. They need to learn from their mistakes so they don't hurt anyone else (or themselves) again, not be crucified for them.
@49 and others: If I was in the wife's shoes, I would much rather be told, and deal with the emotional fallout, then to not be told and suddenly wake up and find that I have AIDS. Non-disclosure isn't just immoral, it's potentially lethal. I don't care how much drama it causes; the wife has a right to know.
I see. So we all have the right -- no, the obligation! -- to condemn these people even though none of us is involved in this story. But forgiveness? That's crossing the line.
Hmmm, let me consult some outside sources on that...Well what do you know, it turns you were right. There it is exactly as you said in chapter one of The Angry Mob's Ethical Handbook.
My 20 years in the Navy the phrase "what happens on deployment stays on deployment" was code for don't tell my wife who I'm screwing...
These are the same moralistic assholes who dare to judge gays in the military.
I'd say phuk both of 'em but they've been there and done that.
Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5grdfnGU…
Lyrics
http://www.oldielyrics.com/lyrics/robert…
Damn Kids...
Yeah, people get lonely and deployments suck. After a day, though? If people can't handle long separations, they really shouldn't marry/get seriously involved with people in the military. I've lived through my share of deployments and don't find anything sympathetic about either of these bottomfeeders. It's tough, but it's not the end of the world; you get time to do all those hobbies and interests your spouse hates, you hang out with friends a lot, you visit the spouse if you can, and you get on with life.
"just been deployed for the first time since they'd been married"
So does that mean she'd been deployed previously while they were dating? Is this a pattern of behaviour for him or something?
No sympathy for anyone but the deployed wife on this one.
Cognitive Dissonance R Us seems to be open for business today.
However, if you consider the wife as well, then he "wins" at being the bigger jerk for what he's done to her. (Assuming they didn't talk this through and she okayed it, which, given his overall level of communication, seems extremely unlikely.)
The wife went to a place where she might well have been shot dead and he had nothing better to do than cheat on her, within DAYS of her leaving, and then move the other woman into their married home and sleep with her in their bed.
And he kept her around until the very day the wife came back! He was going to have sex with his wife in that bed within 24 hours of having sex in it with a would-be home-wrecker. Was he even going to change the sheets?
Honestly, I hope the wife kicks HIM out of the house now--since she's the one in the military, I'm assuming the base housing would be hers? He can get back together with SE, for all I care. They deserve each other.
After all, whenever a woman does something like that, it is the man's fault for not doing X, Y and Z, right? Right?
And he's so traumatized by being left by wifey, instead of worrying about how she's handling being deployed, sleeping in a tent with baby rats scrabbling at night or in a converted metal container, being run ragged (all of which one of my good friends in the Reserves went through recently, so I'm not exaggerating), he's wondering how he'll pull through.
She should have backed off as soon as he laid his sob story on her. What did she expect when dealing with someone reeking of desperation and immaturity. And did his wife not take a laptop with her? They could have been communicating back and forth every night, keeping their relationship active.
Instead, the LW does the stupidest thing possible and falls in love with him. Mind you, he was an idiot and a coward to not have reminded her that this was, after all, a temporary situation. But I guess he feared she might storm off and then, poor baby, he'd be cut off from sex ... uh ... companionship again. So he didn't. But I can see the wife's return schedule being slightly nebulous, though it's no excuse for him. When service personnel are returning to the States, they may be given a window but may not know until the last minute the exact flight details.
She was desperate.
He was desperate.
They're both equal jerks.
And the wife deserves much better than him.
How do you sort through this chaos? Dude's wife hasn't even landed abroad yet and he's already moving his interim fuck toy in? He chucks her-with no fanfare or warning--the day of his wife's return? What a catch.
And, seriously, how entwined a combination of low self-esteem, romantic desperation, poor judgment and gullibility must you have to move in after a few days with a dude you met at a bar who turned his "my wife just left for war" into a fucking pick-up line? What a moron.
Profoundly depressing. The selfish and stupid have all the fun, even while wallowing in their pathetic self-created melodramas. True loneliness, love and compassion eludes them. Pathetic.
Where's the inconsistency?
Dan, seriously, we're the same age, you don't remember that song?
Maddy81 @91.
The PUAs would agree with you, at least.
If it's true, then might the reason be that a lot of people, when wanting to get laid, also want to be lied to, the way that people go to the theatre to enjoy something that they know isn't real? Or because it makes things easier on their consciences as they go and do what they wanted to do anyways?
@91 Yeah, also that. The scumbags/losers/imbeciles I've known have been the ones to spend the least amount of time single.