Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
is a proud member of the
media network
media network
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
You've encouraged people in the past that have trouble coming to do whatever works as long as their not neglecting the partner. I think she's being a little selfish in her need for him to come in a different position.
Wait, since when did doggy style imply anal? Is there anything in this letter that justifies jumping to that conclusion?
Also, about "being a little selfish and inconsiderate and neglecting to mix it up" — she said that she's already come when the switch positions, so it seems like he's being perfectly accommodating already.
But she thinks he might be gay because he's entering her from behind, because all he can *see* is ass, and that's all gay men wanna see. Never mind that gay men can have anal sex in the missionary position, never mind that he's fucking her pussy, etc.
Some straight men like to look down and see butt -- girl butt, regardless of which hole they're putting it in.
If a man has a clit, it's the underside of the head of the cock.
In the doggy position your cervix will tend to hit that area when he goes deep. That's one reason why that position works best for many guys.
(The mechanics of hetero sex aren't Dan's strongest suit.)
Look how good you have it ... he can go as long as you want in a position that makes you come, then after you've had your orgasm, you switch positions & he gets his.
Most REALLY YOUNG hetero couples have problems with the boy coming too quickly for the girl. No, you're not weird, just REALLY YOUNG.
Sigh. There is no symbol for sarcasm on the Internets.
Just add some of those earlier breakdowns you did for us "dumb breeders" to you app. Maybe under "things you should know" section? Just a thought that may save you some time.
Yeah, but lucky for us, we don't have to for penetration. Anal in missionary looks like quite the contortion from the vids I've seen. Knees by my ears? No thanks.
I'm reminded of an ex that I always wanted to fuck from behind. She too had an amazing ass, and the sight of my cock pounding into that amazing ass generated rather explosive orgasms.
@22: It's not really much of a contortion. The holes are not that far apart, so it's not that different from vaginal sex.
I've seen porn where some of the angles made it hard/impossible to tell whether the missionary-position sex was anal or vaginal.
Cause Danny cares about you.
That's what he meant to say....
She does just sound really young. Hey, it gave Dan a good chance to print the beautifully concise "into ass ≠ gay". I'll be happy to have a shorthand next time it comes up.
Dan, perhaps you should have some FAQs on your page to forestall these kinds of questions, or, if you really want to educate, you should answers letters like this privately, and spare the writers the scorn of your regular readers.
>2011
>still can't greentext on SLOG
If you think any question about sex is "simple", you yourself definitely fit the bill.
(PS, I WISH I had this problem).
Once you've had your own orgasm, you are pretty much on duty to start paying full attention to the needs of the partner who hasn't come yet. Wanting him to be sure to occasionally come in some other arbitrary position in order to soothe some ill-conceived insecurity on your part hardly qualifies as taking care of him.
Honestly, woman, don't YOU have some positions that work better than others?
perfect in every way?
what's the matter with kids today?
Paul Lynde sang this on Broadway in Bye Bye Birdie.
Here's something that irks me. The Reverse Cowgirl. This has to be the most unfulfilling position in the history of sex.
My estimation is that it serves one and only one purpose....porn videos. It's the best shot for a porn video because it shows everything of the girl and the guy is totally hidden (the ideal fantasy). But in terms of pleasure, it ranks about the level of a foot massage.
For some reason girls who really like the R.C. are the tomboyish types who treat sex like riding a dirt bike and so you're there always in danger of your pecker being snapped off at which point she will say "oh, oops, sorry" and find another pole.
That's a terrific idea!
In fact, it's an idea your fellow Baltimore homosexuals have been acting out for years!!
And that gives 38% of them HIV!!!
Different positions allow different kinds of contact between your bodies, and different muscles to be used. We don't do missionary much because it places unpleasant stress on my wife's pelvis (w/o a pillow under her butt). Maybe he feels more comfortable, and has just the right angle (etc..), or just has the best range of motion in that position (doggy). And, maybe, he adores looking at your ass, or all the above. If you prefer a different position because you like to kiss when you come, or whatever you want, just say so!
Have fun!
Peace.
uh, Bob; "virgin" may not mean what you think it does....
@58: Your ass is in his face? Wouldn't he have to crane his neck to look at your ass rather than at your back?
@63: Palmela Handerson doesn't count.
In my personal opinion, regular cowgirl trumps. But then again I'm a breast man, not an ass man.
I'm surprised no one mentioned the other reason he may prefer doggystyle - it may keep her from TALKING the whole time.
I've also given myself thousands of orgasms over the years, and I can say this: the worst orgasm provided by someone else was better than the best orgasm I gave myself.
So, you know, some of us young'uns have been paying attention. Then again, this girl does sound considerably younger than me, and I do second the idea of a "Best of Savage"/"Things that are not signs your boyfriend is gay" compilation.
Since she says she's a big fan of his, she's going to get shit on a thread like this for either option. Not saying it's right, just trying to explain why it's happening at all
I assume Dan has plenty of big fans out there who have probably never read a word he wrote, just as he has many irate detractors out there like Seattleblecch who have probably never read a word he wrote.