Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Editors' Picks
is a proud member of the
network
network
All contents © Noisy Creek, Inc.
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
I can't say the clothes matter much, but the roid look of the first link is a real turn off.
If I had to choose one of the outfits for a guy I was going to sleep with, it would be the lingerie for sure.
The second model looks bitchy and high maintenance - and that is a turn-off for me. Plus, I'm sorry - If cross-dressing is your thing, go forward with my support and blessing, but it just doesn't do a thing for me, erotically speaking. If I wanted that, I'd be with a woman.
NSFYW
I'm sure that makes sense to somebody.
It's a fascinating question though. Wonder what percentage of straight guys would answer likewise.
No, really...OMG...I...I can't even...not process.
Is this a fetish type thing? I mean, the lingerie thing is kind of hot, as long as they're not bitchy and high maintenance (as @44 suggests, and I concur). The weird penis trunk thing is not terrible, but kind of weird. Far better than those gross toe shoe glove things. But, @42's link?! Dude.
(P.S. I secretly love it for its brain-scrubbingness)
@48, Straight woman here: the combination of breasts and dick is HOT! Easy choice there for me too, though Buck Angel has his own appeal.
That being said, yes, blue is flattering. Do I have to sleep with him? Can I just have him stand in the corner and hold my towel for me?
Okay, if I must, then I'll take NOT the model in #2, but one of the other ones.
#1 with its dinky dink-holders is just too narcissistic (way more than anything involving a cross-dresser wearing satin and fishnets).
But of course the correct answer is the one that doesn't snore and/or hog the covers and thrash around in his sleep.
Now, all things being equal between the guys, I would easily go with #2. I can be game for -- and even joy -- kinks that aren't my own for a guy I think is hot. But I couldn't get around the elephant sock on just about anybody.
Oh Fnarf, why did you send me there? Now I'm afraid to fall asleep.
Buh.
Also @48, I would choose Buck, all day, everyday, until my vagina swells shut.
@ Dan, choice #2. The cock-sock is never gonna work for me, while the girly wear is fine...and he is the way hotter model.
@ 42, Fnarf I have sworn an oath of blood vengance upon you.
@ 48, Both--at the same time.
But, strictly speaking, I don't think the hip-to-waist ratio rule applies to men. If a guy bends forward and arches his back -- which enhances any woman's hip-to-waist ratio, and is a staple of porn -- his ass looks like a couple of large and boney knees, which I can't imagine anyone finding attractive.
So is there anything analogous on guys to women's hip-to-waist ratio? For the people expressing delight over the men in lingerie, is it the prospect of seeing these models flash their asses like a pair of fan-blades that's going to send a tidal wave of blood and tension to your pelvii? How does attraction to the male figure work?
Ew. Ew. Fucking Ew.
Personality goes a long way.
(However, I would be less likely to be completely repelled by the personality of a man in men's lingerie than I would by a man in a penis sheath. Once I got done laughing.)
If I have no choice - if someone is holding a gun to the head of a family member, for instance - I guess I'll go with #2. But man, lingerie on a guy does nothing for me. Neither do six pack abs. I prefer a nicely toned, lightly furred chest on a cutely geeky guy...
Uh, I'll be in my bunk.
also:
How drunk are we assuming I am?
Can I choose both and then just sit it out while they sort each other out?
If not then I guess at least that's a nice shade of blue #2 is wearing.