It's also possible that Romney figures he has WA delegates tied up, since the straw poll on March 3 is non-binding and delegate selection is likely to be dominated by party insiders.
Yeah, foreign policy. By which you mean the three remaining candidates are all promising to bomb Iran the day of the inauguration; the only difference between them being that Romney is probably lying and won't do it.
@2: I'm not so sure about that. Most of Eastern Washington leans more towards Santorum or Paul than they do Romney (except for the LDS stake out in the Spokane Valley), and if the Wilbur Kirbys of the world try to be too much like the bogus process in Maine they put their own standing in the party at risk.
Plus you've got Steve Beren stumping for Newt, so maybe?
@2, When people say silly things like "Romney figures he has WA delegates tied up", I have to remind you that WA republicans can be a bunch of loons. Don't forget that WA went for Pat Robertson in '88. I don't have a clue what Romney's strategy is, but if he assumes he has WA easily locked up, he's in for a huge surprise.
You're not really that clever Paul. Is it really that surprising? He has like 100 more delegates than the next person and Washington's is going to be split because caucus's often don't produce one outstanding victor.
I wouldn't come here if I was him either; paul, this is why you're a writer and not working as a campaign strategist.
Federal Way? What kind of loser campaigns in Federal Way? What, did he have a talk at SeaTac Mall like some kind of surreal episode of Mallrats, with all the vacant shops around him?
Um, you mean like Bain Capital?
Epic fail, dude...
Plus you've got Steve Beren stumping for Newt, so maybe?
Mittens will nuke Iran, @4. Until after he launches the missiles and changes his mind right before impact.
I wouldn't come here if I was him either; paul, this is why you're a writer and not working as a campaign strategist.
The feeling's mutual.