It'll take more than a Supreme Court ruling to convince Rand Paul that something is constitutional:

“Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so. The whole thing remains unconstitutional,” the freshman lawmaker said in a statement. “While the court may have erroneously come to the conclusion that the law is allowable, it certainly does nothing to make this mandate or government takeover of our health care right.”

I'm sure there's a logical explanation behind Senator Rand Paul's nonsense statement. Maybe he isn't referring to the Constitution of the United States of America with this statement? Perhaps Obamacare is unconstitutional in his own private country of Randsylvania? In any case, Jim McDermott has a statement about Rand Paul's statement: