Mary, you write like you're trying to be funny or something, comes off not even sophomoric. So, try this, take a big DRAG off of one of Dom's blunts, then come back and re-write the post.
@ 3 Actually I don't think that Eddie Izzard defines what he does as drag. If memory serves he actually states he isn't a drag queen in one of his stand-up acts.
@7, you should definitely put on blackface and go out in public and try to explain to people you meet how it's totally not racist. Be sure to use the n-word liberally in your explanation, as you are not a racist and it is therefore okay for you to do that.
@10 No, blackface is always racially charged, but whether it's actually racist depends entirely on the context in which it is used. A good example is the yellowface in Breakfast at Tiffany's versus Cloud Atlas- Breakfast at Tiffany's makes a white actor into a Japanese man for cheap laughs (which is offensive both in the way Japanese were characterized, and also the fact that they wouldn't hire an asian actor to begin with) Cloud Atlas on the other hand put actors in new racial/age/sex drag in order to draw attention to the fact that we are all the same, no matter what race/sex/age you are. So to write Cloud Atlas off as racist is to ignore the entire context of the movie.
Straight men doing drag is 100% fine. However, by suggesting that a straight man dressing as a woman might be offensive to gay people, since a white man dressing as a black man is offensive to a black man, you're kind of calling gay men women.
That's a pretty strained argument, but it's the only offensive I can find here and I am liberal as fuck. So, I guess I'm saying you're fine.
@13 I'm pretty sure Cloud Atlas is one of the few exceptions to the dressing up as another race rule. I've never seen another one. Tropic Thunder tried but the whole movie was so bad it couldn't pull it off.
If there's one thing that drag shows have been historically known for, it's their gentle nature, their innate sensitivity to the delicate nature of their audience, and their desire at all costs not to offend by the misuse of politically inflammatory material. So by all means, convene a study group before you buy that first tube of lipstick.
I'm repulsed by typical drag shows because they just seem like dudes making fun of trans people and women. I must be dumb because I'm pretty sure I'm the only one who feels that way, but it seems so blatant and offensive to me.
As a person who clearly does drag at a recognized level, who happens to prefer females as life and dating partners regardless of the clothes I wear (or she wears) I say we all can do what we please, Is if offensive? Well that has a lot to do with the message. I think that as we are seeing more people expressing gender challenging presentations that mix and match. Orientation IS a factor to some, because the label of Drag Queen is closely tied to the early gay rights movement. Gender identity and sexual orientation are separate components of a person's nature.
There is a culture related to drag in the gay community that straight men rarely participate in, and you could argue that to do drag and not be gay makes you a crossdresser, or "t-gurl" or any number of ill defined labels. If your definition of drag queen is anyone who walks the world as a Queen while Dressed As A Girl (drag) then anyone can do it. If your definition includes a requirement of being gay, maybe not. I think it is interesting to even have this conversation myself, and to avoid the baggage many people care about those of us who walk in both types of shoes, I prefer "manwomanwomanman." Your Mileage May Vary. :)
Straight guys have been doing drag since Aeschylus cast one as Atossa, mother of King Xerxes, in "The Persians" in 472 BCE. In fact, guys playing dames onstage was a standard convention of Western Theatre up until the mid-1600's.
"Cloud Atlas on the other hand put actors in new racial/age/sex drag in order to draw attention to the fact that we are all the same, no matter what race/sex/age you are. So to write Cloud Atlas off as racist is to ignore the entire context of the movie."
But why couldn't they have cast POC as the characters instead of putting Tom Hanks in yellowface? The idea that "we are all the same" is, IMO, patently ridiculous. Yes, we are all the same species, but each of us enters and moves through society with vastly different experiences that shape us. Come on, I dare you to go tell a trans* person of color how you and they are EXACTLY the same! I don't see color! We're all just people! It's a line of innocent bullshit that seems to only be spit out by white people (I say this as a white person who has said that same bullshit in the past).
That being said, if a straight guy wants to do drag and can acknowledge the difference in power/societal dynamics between men and women in his act without simply doing a "LOL I'M A GIRL MAKEUP AND SHOES OH MY" thing, more power to him.
I've seen guys wear women's clothes (a woman's skinny jeans in one case, no less), and nobody was the wiser. So... yeah. Or did you mean a different scenario?
Yes drag is like blackface, but it's women that are being mocked through immitation. At their best, I find drag queens mildly entertaining and mildly offensive, but if Gay men can do it, hetero men should be able to do it.
The question is "are they parodying females as people, or the female gender role?" And if its the latter, then shouldn't it be women mocking femininity through performance?
@35- I'm sorry you see drag that way. I'm not to trying to trivialize your opinion when I say I can't understand it and that I think it's horribly misinformed.
Drag isn't SUPPOSED to be offensive to women. It happens, but I'd say that it's not where its heart is. Drag, to me, is equal parts homage and parody, but the parody is not of women themselves but of female standards of beauty. In the act of going from man to queen, with all the hours, pain, and money that goes into that, I feel to some degree connected to the absurdity that is the female toilette, the same process that creates figures of incredible beauty but similarly marginalizes a lot of women. Good drag, again, is the dichotomy of honoring the female standard of beauty and the ferocious women that embody it while undermining it at the same time.
As a drag queen myself (the more widely accepted, gay male-identified dude that performs in drag and lives as a man variety) I've met a melange of queens. Drag is for everyone, of every gender identity and orientation not only to enjoy but also participate it.
I appreciate how considerate every here is, but I always thought that drag was nothing more than just about having fun with mom's or sister's makeup and wardrobe and playing being a girl (culturally forbidden for straight guys, but accepted with gay guys).
Even if you thought there were some kind of deep political issues in drag, and I don't, wouldn't the analogy of blackface be "drag is to women what blackface is to black people?"
What the hell? I know there's a difference between drag and crossdressing but it's not all THAT huge, and most crossdressers are straight or bisexual, very few of them are outright gay. Does this poster live with the Amish or something?
Eddiz Izzard is a straight cis transvestite, or 'male tomboy.' He likes women's clothes and chooses to approach them in the same way women can wear clothing typically gendered male.
Cross-dressers are typically defined as straight men who dress as women for sexual gratification - though there's some controversy about this.
Neither crossdresser nor transvestite has anything to do with drag. And these three things have nothing to do with transgenderism, either.
@43: "People who find drag insulting are no-sense-of-humor saddos, no matter how much they try to dress it up with theories they got from old copies of Ms"
In my travels, most of the people who find it insulting are either RadFems or transpersons, for different reasons, but their dislike generally stems from the more male privilege-oriented and grotesque elements of drag.
@50: You implied anyone who was offended, not "Chronically offended people". Perpetual victims are irrelevant to the discussion, using them to deligitimize others is pretty shitty.
"But why couldn't they have cast POC as the characters instead of putting Tom Hanks in yellowface?"
First, Tom Hanks was not put in yellowface in Cloud Atlas. He happened to play a white male in every time period. Second, people of color WERE cast; Halle Berry, Doona Bae, Keith David...do these people not count? Many of them, in addition to the white men, played characters of different races, ages, and sexes.
What's more, the question you ask is directly answered by the quote that precedes it in your comment. It's as though you didn't even read it. They put actors in roles of differing races, ages, and sexes for the express purpose of communicating the point that all people are connected, and that actions in one time echo throughout history and have fantastic and unforeseen ramifications tens or hundreds of years later. No one is trying to say that a trans person of color is "exactly the same" as a white man, so don't waste our time knocking down that straw man.
I am blessed with a deep voice that gets me called "sir" on the phone regularly, greater than average height for a woman, and somewhat broad shoulders. And I have the perfect beard: a really swishy gay guy to be my "date".
I want to pass as a man dressed as a woman, and be fabulous, and lip sync.
Of all the acts at local drag night that I used to attend, which was once a week at a mostly straight bar, the ones that stand out the most were the staff and straight patrons who started out by accepting the night, the cheap drinks (and in case of the owners, the $) eventually getting up on stage. Seeing the straight guys doing a number or two was great. And they 'wercked' it. They cared about how they would come off, and they put a shit load more effort in then some of the paid acts. It's amazing what initially happened as a business move to fill up empty sunday space ended up transforming into something that changed minds and created allies to the point where the owners of the establishment consider the drag show patrons their friends and wanted to perform for them and do well.
part 1 its not the clothes that make a person weather they have on whats called male or female clothers its whats on the inside that counts....it does not change what a person is by the cloth thats on their back.
part 2.... just look at what the females of today wear... they have on pants, jeans. mens sneakers, ties jacketsa mens coats amoung other things & nobody blinks an eye. but execpt for some actors, or on halloween (my fav holiday). if a guy put on anything thats deemed female he gets teased or beat up its not fair. yes im a crossdresser (novice) IM AFRAID TO GO OUT IN DRAG EVEN ON HALLOWEEN BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO BE TARGETED. on the lighter side if i win the 586 million dollars ill buy a piece of land in pa off of route 715 a defunked resort & turn into a cd tv fi ts tv & gender bending resort
And sure you'll be burned, but not for this.
Although please do not generalize from that and take away the lesson that if Hollywood does something, you can do it too. That is a very bad lesson.
That being said I think anyone can do drag.
That's a pretty strained argument, but it's the only offensive I can find here and I am liberal as fuck. So, I guess I'm saying you're fine.
@7: "Black face is not racist to those with no racial bigotry in their heart"
Man are you a piece of absolute human shit.
No one ever said men in kilts were gay. If they did, then someone probably hurt them for saying it.
There is a culture related to drag in the gay community that straight men rarely participate in, and you could argue that to do drag and not be gay makes you a crossdresser, or "t-gurl" or any number of ill defined labels. If your definition of drag queen is anyone who walks the world as a Queen while Dressed As A Girl (drag) then anyone can do it. If your definition includes a requirement of being gay, maybe not. I think it is interesting to even have this conversation myself, and to avoid the baggage many people care about those of us who walk in both types of shoes, I prefer "manwomanwomanman." Your Mileage May Vary. :)
Female impersonators.
Crossdressers. Transvestites.
Three or four different things.
But why couldn't they have cast POC as the characters instead of putting Tom Hanks in yellowface? The idea that "we are all the same" is, IMO, patently ridiculous. Yes, we are all the same species, but each of us enters and moves through society with vastly different experiences that shape us. Come on, I dare you to go tell a trans* person of color how you and they are EXACTLY the same! I don't see color! We're all just people! It's a line of innocent bullshit that seems to only be spit out by white people (I say this as a white person who has said that same bullshit in the past).
That being said, if a straight guy wants to do drag and can acknowledge the difference in power/societal dynamics between men and women in his act without simply doing a "LOL I'M A GIRL MAKEUP AND SHOES OH MY" thing, more power to him.
The question is "are they parodying females as people, or the female gender role?" And if its the latter, then shouldn't it be women mocking femininity through performance?
You are indeed crazy. Please seek psychiatric help immediately.
Drag isn't SUPPOSED to be offensive to women. It happens, but I'd say that it's not where its heart is. Drag, to me, is equal parts homage and parody, but the parody is not of women themselves but of female standards of beauty. In the act of going from man to queen, with all the hours, pain, and money that goes into that, I feel to some degree connected to the absurdity that is the female toilette, the same process that creates figures of incredible beauty but similarly marginalizes a lot of women. Good drag, again, is the dichotomy of honoring the female standard of beauty and the ferocious women that embody it while undermining it at the same time.
As a drag queen myself (the more widely accepted, gay male-identified dude that performs in drag and lives as a man variety) I've met a melange of queens. Drag is for everyone, of every gender identity and orientation not only to enjoy but also participate it.
Seriously, doing drag is the cat's ass.
Cross-dressers are typically defined as straight men who dress as women for sexual gratification - though there's some controversy about this.
Neither crossdresser nor transvestite has anything to do with drag. And these three things have nothing to do with transgenderism, either.
In my travels, most of the people who find it insulting are either RadFems or transpersons, for different reasons, but their dislike generally stems from the more male privilege-oriented and grotesque elements of drag.
See the DSM definition of Factitious Disorder.
Go slap on some Wet n Wild, foam rubber hips and that divine vintage muu muu you found at Red Light and have a good time.
"But why couldn't they have cast POC as the characters instead of putting Tom Hanks in yellowface?"
First, Tom Hanks was not put in yellowface in Cloud Atlas. He happened to play a white male in every time period. Second, people of color WERE cast; Halle Berry, Doona Bae, Keith David...do these people not count? Many of them, in addition to the white men, played characters of different races, ages, and sexes.
What's more, the question you ask is directly answered by the quote that precedes it in your comment. It's as though you didn't even read it. They put actors in roles of differing races, ages, and sexes for the express purpose of communicating the point that all people are connected, and that actions in one time echo throughout history and have fantastic and unforeseen ramifications tens or hundreds of years later. No one is trying to say that a trans person of color is "exactly the same" as a white man, so don't waste our time knocking down that straw man.
I am blessed with a deep voice that gets me called "sir" on the phone regularly, greater than average height for a woman, and somewhat broad shoulders. And I have the perfect beard: a really swishy gay guy to be my "date".
I want to pass as a man dressed as a woman, and be fabulous, and lip sync.
Fuck yeah straight guys can do drag. More should.
Can Str8t Guyz do Drag?—
Queried a curious Fag Hag
Well, of course, honey!!!
I’ll bet you Money!!!
They wanna get Pegged—
They’ve even begged
Gimme that Dildo!!!
And quick a Pillow!!!
part 2.... just look at what the females of today wear... they have on pants, jeans. mens sneakers, ties jacketsa mens coats amoung other things & nobody blinks an eye. but execpt for some actors, or on halloween (my fav holiday). if a guy put on anything thats deemed female he gets teased or beat up its not fair. yes im a crossdresser (novice) IM AFRAID TO GO OUT IN DRAG EVEN ON HALLOWEEN BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO BE TARGETED. on the lighter side if i win the 586 million dollars ill buy a piece of land in pa off of route 715 a defunked resort & turn into a cd tv fi ts tv & gender bending resort