Comments

1
Political virtue consists in standing for what’s right, even — or indeed especially — when it doesn’t redound to your own benefit. Someone should ask Portman why he didn’t take a stand for, you know, other people’s children.

Truer words have never, NEVER, been spoken. (OK, written.)

Still, when someone comes around (quite publicly) to your side, spitting in their face isn't really the best idea. Thank Senator Portman, especially thank Will Portman, move on, keep fighting.
3
When I read all the nastiness coming from the Right today, I wondered what Portman thought about it. Wouldn't it be nice to think that maybe his eyes were opened enough to finally see what assholes he's been cozying up to* all these years? Keep it up, haters!

* though cozying up to assholes if a fine thing to do, if done literally.
4
My 16 year old daughter mentioned today (apropos of debate topics for language class) that gay marriage is a complete no-brainer amongst her high school classmates. It's just bonkers to them that this is even debated.

Yeah, our family has been pro-same sex marriage (at age 4 my daughter considered it a no-brainer because duh, obviously her best friend's parents were married by her understanding of how marriage worked), but this isn't her taking a bold stand. This is her reflecting the social norm in her (Massachusetts) high school, for how you think about same sex marriage if you're not some complete moron.
5
1. AAAAA, reading the news once a day is enough.
2. What's worse than not taking a stand for other people's children is not even taking a stand for your own. But most parents come around...eventually, or partially.
6
So true. During the seemingly endless ballot measures we fought from the Oregon Citizens Alliance I got so angry and frustrated with Lon Mabon and Scott Lively that I ended up in the hospital. But the OCA's rhetoric was so extreme that it backfired. The copycat measure to Oregon's 1992 Measure 9, Colorado's Measure 2, led to our landmark Romer v Evans victory at the US Supreme Court. The OCA's extremism tore apart the state Republican Party to such an extent that it no longer holds any statewide offices and is effectively shut out of state government. And Scott Lively is on trial for Crimes Against Humanity. None of this was apparent in 1992, when I was so angry at antigay assholes I nearly made the mistake of committing suicide over it.

It does get better. :)

7
I have had 40 years of listening to the crap from the Fourth Reich and frankly, I'm done. I live and work in DC. If any of these people come near me, as RuPaul loves to say, THE LIBRARY IS OPEN.
8
My personal rage is often mitigated by the sheer absurdity of the arguments. Drunk driving? You don't have to be a bleeding heart bisexual communist from one of the coasts to know how asinine that statement is. You can almost hear the crowd booing, the gong sounding. And it's getting louder every day.
9
Hmmm. Time for Dan's anti-gay troll to make an appearance.

Here, troll! Where are you?
10
Ms I - "Our family has been pro-same sex marriage..."? While I appreciate all your individual positions, your stating it as a point of Family Groupthink brings back nightmares. I suffered terribly from parental attempts to impose Family Groupthink in a different direction, and was often associated with them by my parents in various statements entirely divergent from my own views and completely against my will. Obviously that's not the case here for those in your family, and I am glad of it, but Family Groupthink in a slightly different form is at the heart of what's problematic about the Senator's change of position - would you object to an exchange of "have all" for "has"?
11
Also, 1 makes a good point: Not that Krugman is wrong, but that spitting on people who just came around to your side is strategically stupid. If same sex marriage is to become the law of the land, then many people who opposed it a decade ago need to change their minds.
12
@10: Sigh. My daughter brought it up, at age 4. (Before same sex marriage was legal here.) My husband and I were fine with it, thought not strongly in support until it became an issue and we had to think about it in real, legal terms rather than as a nice abstraction that might become true in a few decades but obviously not now. It was a case of her leading us to think about something we could passively ignore because it didn't directly affect us much (shades of Portman), not a case of us imposing a family view upon her. I brought it up here to counter any "because we raised her to think properly" impression.

Though even my elderly Republican father came around on same sex marriage, on grounds of personal freedom and the state letting people live their lives.
13
AAAAA - While Dan is correct, I think another thing to think about to solve your issue more directly is that even if you read the news, you don't have to read the comments. You can also read the comments only from certain sites - some have a much higher proportion of assholes/crazies, and others are moderated.
14
@9 - I know!!! I was really hoping for something big from him/them, but nada. Now I have the sadz.
15
I agree with 13, I do tend to skip comments on news I know is bound to call out the trolls, but it isn't so easy to ignore when your facebook feed is full of bigotry and stupidity. I grew up in a back-ass-ward places and I cannot get rid of the bad views of people left living there. It's either try to ignore them (usually), blow up at them (sporadically), unfriend them (a few), or block them from my news feed (something I don't like to do because I want to educate them).
16
I skip these news stories; my blood pressure can't take it. I just repeat to myself I am lucky to live in a state, in a time, when gay marriage is legal, and that I have come out (more or less, it's basically the openest "secret" in the family that I'm a dyke).

ANYWAY, I just wanted to point this line out: "Terry and I got so gay last night that we rear-ended three people."
Please please tell me that pun was intentional. I laughed so hard!
17
Use your anger, AAAAA. I'm dead serious. Learn to control it, temper it, make it come and go at your pleasure. If you exert control over your anger, you can let it seethe within you without it putting you in a bad mood. And you can open the valves and let some out on occasion if you need a quick adrenaline kick.
18
The older I get (51, in a 26-year not-recognized-by-our-state-marriage-like relationship with the same woman) the less I find I care why, exactly, someone changes their mind about treating gays like humans, and am simply grateful that they do. If it took finding out his son was gay to "evolve" Senator Portman, I can live with that. At least he did come around. Too many gay-hating people would rather lose their children and keep their prejudices. I have nothing but respect for him for choosing his son over his party platform.
19
Ms I - Sorry for coming across as crabby, but I think it's an important quibble.
20
If memory serves, before it was even a consensus in the LGBT community, it was the Republican Party who made a big foofahrah about Gay Marriage, so as to turn our their troglodyte voters.

Which was a very successful strategy for them -- until it .wasn't

Soooo in a sense it was they who brung it up, and now they're reaping the whirlwind.

But correct me, if I'm wrong.
21
> "Terry and I got so gay last night that we rear-ended three people."

Oh man, glad I'm not the only one who's had those nights.
22
@1, @11

Portman didn't come over to our side. He came over to his side. Fuck him.
23
@22 Simmer down.

His side is our side. Every one on it is appreciated, no matter when they got here or what they did before.

The last 20 years have seen an amazingly fast social change in the understanding of equality and what that means for our civil law. A sitting Republican Senator is a huge deal. And like some of us, including Dan, have been saying all along, people like him probably wouldn't have ever changed his mind due to arguments, no matter how well presented. They do it out of love. His love for his son made him a better person. For me, that is something to celebrate, not something to spit upon.
24
Stop worrying what other people think. I find most people have never even heard of these groups (NOM, FRC, AFA) or their leaders (Perkins, Sprigg, & others). They pretty much only attract the loonies. You'll never get thru to loon birds.
25
As for Portman as long as he votes the right way on LGBT issues I could care less how he got here or where he goes from here. That's his problem. I just want to be able to rely on his vote should the need arise.
26
I'd never heard of Sen. Portman before, so I know nothing about his record, but I can say that having a close relative come out made me more likely to speak up on gay rights. I've always believed in gay marriage, adoption rights, etc., and voted/donated accordingly but didn't devote much passion to the issue. Since my brother came out, when I hear the ugliness espoused by lunatics like Perkins or the politely phrase bigotry of so many public figures it just tears me apart.
There are plenty of prominent republicans with gay family members who just consider it their private family business and keep quiet who their colleagues beat up on gay people. Bravo to Sen. Portman for speaking up and standing with his son. I wish he had done so sooner, but I bet he does too.
27
Interesting that these nutters didn't say a word about Jim Nabors choice to be gay and marry his partner of 38 years. I guess they'll give old Gomer a pass huh?
28
Hate fades, yes, but does disgust fade? Or does it just go underground like racism?
29
To bring a little social science into this: we can be happy about the outcome (Sen. Portman changing to support gay marriage) even if we don't care to ascribe personal virtue to the person whose mind changed (since he didn't care about other people's gay kids).

In this case, it may not be a matter of virtue, but of ability to comprehend and talk about a normative position for which there was no place or explanation. Making things personally important gives him a way to talk about this - "I don't see how a just God can hate homosexuals, because I know personally that my son is a good person" - that he didn't have before in his belief/culture system.

People tend to overrule groupthink when personal evidence points to the contrary, and they need some time to process the cognitive dissonance; that has to happen on an individual basis if there are no supportive groups helping them to transition (like PFLAG). I don't think that Sen. Portman had a lot of people he could just call up and talk about this change of heart with (Dick Cheney doesn't take phone calls, I'm sure). Meanwhile, the groupthinkers he left probably see it as a betrayal, and so they're out in force even stronger to shore up their wavering faith in their beliefs.

So I agree that Will Portman is the hero here, but we need to welcome Rob to the party, even if he came late. And he can be a designated straight driver.
30
Sure having a family member come out affects their family.

But that process can be slow.

Getting to the ALL 4 year olds and brain washing them is much much more effective,

Which is why Pre-K GSA is so vital.

Once the Hitler Youth got rolling
it took less than a decade to turn the Germans into loyal Nazis
and drive out competing schools of thought.

And that certainly worked out well.

This is how a civilization falls.

Join the herd! Faster!! We're Winning!!! Don't be left behind!!!

Pay no attention to the cliff ahead....

Life is Hard but it is Fair.

You make your Choices and you reap the Consequences.

Inevitably.

Sure,
sometimes you can delay the inevitable,
and drag a few more folks down with you,
but the End always comes.

People like Danny make their choice,
double down despite their nagging doubts,
convince them self that this is What They Are;
it is sad but that's how life works.
We feel sorry for Danny.

We feel more sorry for the weak minded followers in society.

In a culture where enlightened prudent values dominate
they will usually make those good choices and reap the rewards of a fulfilled life.

But where the dominant values are enticing corruptions and perversions they are easily swayed.
Rats that, unwisely, stream ONTO the sinking ship.

The increasing momentum of the descent into depravity is telling.

Unfortunately they are growing up in the Qunited States of Gommorica.

The values their civilization is relentlessly pushing
only lead to misery, disappointment, destruction.

Fewer and fewer will have the courage to stay the course.

Will the HomoLiberals descend into decades of violent economic demographic epidemiological chaos
and tear each other apart as resources become scarce?
Or will N Korea or some tsunami/quake/volcano provide a quicker more merciful conclusion?

stay tuned.....

Porter. Profile in Courage or Swarming Rat?

You know the answer.......
31
@30 This thread wouldn't have been complete without you. Hugs.
32
Same sex marriage! OMG! Our American civilization is going to Hell!! Next thing, single payer health care! Metric system! We're going -- Canadian! Gasp!
33
@30: Dude, take your weird poetry elsewhere. Does this look like open mic at the dorkiest bar in America?
34
32

haha. cute.

and yet, you must admit that our civilization IS spiraling out of control;

financial crisis the president will not even recognize (civilizations in decline are good at denial...);

a population that is unable to provide its own health care or education without massive government subsidy (civilizations in decline are very poor at Personal Responsibility),

family structure evaporating (more than half of kids born to single women, alas are there enough gallant homosexual marrieds to Save Our Children?)

of course it may be a coincidence that Danny's Big Fat Gay Victory comes along at the same time America is swirling down the Crapper but it is just possible that embracing homosexuality is a symptom of a Civilization on its last tottering leg.
35
33

it does now.....
36
@1 +100 on Krugman: courage requires doing something which might hurt your own interests, when it's the right thing to do. Perhaps it took seeing his own son coming out to see what was right, but Portman is probably hurting his chances with his own party.

In any case, spitting in people's faces when they have come around is the very last thing you should do; lots of Republicans who've exploited this issue cynically - paid lip service to hate not on principle but merely to exploit hatred as a means of rabble-rousing - will now come around in droves. It is particularly galling because unlike the true-believers, they aren't even doing it out of some (twisted) genuine principle - they know it's bigotry and they still feed it.

But Dan's right: the more those who persist in the bigotry keep talking, the more they lose the PR war. Saying "fuck you" to people who come around (too late) doesn't do anything except make our side look hateful. Even if being gracious to these people feels like letting them off the hook for horrible behavior.

Speaking of which, I don't live in DC but I do live close by and I'm there frequently, and I do make a point of spitting at or giving the finger to the Bigot's "C Street" fraternity house whenever I can.
37
The rage never completely goes away. I really can't read all the anti-gay news all the time. I'd probably blow my brains out or have a stroke. I'm getting older now and I've learned to monitor my exposure to the hate.

If I'm in a good mood and feeling strong, I'll read a hateful article, and even jump in to comments and push back against the bigots. If I'm having a bad day or feeling vulnerable, I'll just skip the latest article about NOM. Their rhetoric never changes, and I know it will do me no good to read about it, again. Or I might read an article, but skip the comment section full of crazy (depends on the website).

I do agree with Dan about being out publicly. I don't think I've changed any minds when I go off on a rant on a comment thread. But I know that living my life as an openly gay person has changed the minds of coworkers and associates over the years. People have told me so. It is impossible for them to square the crazy shit Tony Perkins says with the reality of knowing me in person.
38
@28 - I don't honestly believe it does fade in many cases - either the hate or the disgust. I've had the opportunity to watch a few elderly acquaintances hit that 'truth serum' phase of dementia and I've been shocked by the things that come out of their mouths. These are people who are in some degree of pain and distress and consequently lashing out; the shock is the form in which it comes out. African American nurses down here in the south deserve combat pay in some cases.

A new social norm - one which makes it socially unacceptable to express certain attitudes and opinions - will silence bigots, but the attitudes don't really change underneath. They just die out.
39
A politician that comes around is an enemy that has been neutered.
40
I'm glad for every person who finally comes around, but I am not grateful.

If you smugly let your neighbors' houses burn, but only join the fire brigade when your own house is smoking, you're and ass. Its nice that you're finally helping out, but you're still an ass.
42
I most certainly welcome Sen. Portman's voice to our side, and I recognize the value that having him do so is likely to have.

Before I nominate him for sainthood, though, I'd like him to not only announce that there should be equality going forward from the point he found out it affects people he cares about, but also that looking backward, he was wrong to work so vocally against it in the past.

This isn't just another bigot who spouted crap in the past - this is an influential person who consciously chose to use his influence against millions of his fellow citizens who never did him any harm.

It's acceptable when a bully stops beating on people. It's wonderful when such a bully starts working on anti-bullying measures. But the apology to those he hurt - including, in this case, the harm he did his son - is still important.

Not the least because, while his own son seems to have come though this to be an out proud gay man, other people's son's and daughters are dead because of him and his party and its attitudes and the laws they have passed, and which his party is still fighting to defend.

I'm glad he's on our side. This change of heart is wonderful. It's going to make a big difference if he sticks with it, and if it gives others the courage to do the same. And nothing he can do can change the past. But that past needs to be acknowledged at some point.

When the bully stops pounding on you, "We're friends, right?" has to come after, "I'm sorry." And turning around to defend you against the bullies who haven't stopped the pounding is one way to show that. We're watching.
44
When I read the hateful comments in threads at National Review's Corner or the Daily Telegraph, I don't get depressed. I feel great! Typically it's only a few guys, probably older, who are obsessed with homosexuality and say all the standard nasty things, with an air of pedantic superiority. But they are digging a hole for themselves and seeing them revealed shows how pathetic they are. (We all know most of these guys are closet cases. Why else be so obsessed?)
45
It might be worth noting an exception to the truism that coming out usually helps to spread acceptance. This is only true if your family likes and respects you. My family sees me as everything that is wrong with the world: leftist, artistic, borderline socialist, atheist. If I were to also come out -- or rather, if I were to let them in on that side of who I am -- the hatred would overflow. We now only talk about once every two years. The might talk to me more if I gave them more to mock. For some families, it's completely a lost cause to let them in.
46
@41, whether one--as a senator--throws legislative matches on your neighbors' houses out of animosity or expediency isn't relevant to me.

Again, it's great that Portman has picked up a bucket and is now pitching in a bit, but I haven't heard anything from him by way of apology for voting for laws that damaged lives. In fact he would like the SCOTUS to not rule for marriage equality.

He has come around enough that he wants his son to have the same opportunities for happiness as his other children...somewhere in a time yet to come. That is still basically self-serving. He has no sense of urgency for the people who are denied--by his vote amongst others--equal rights now.

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/…
48
Portman is not on my side. He is someone who agrees with me, in the most minimal way possible short of disagreeing with me, on one issue.

He doesn't accept that marriage is a right - just that he's OK with some states granting us marital status.

But check out the man's record. He's a horror story. Completely anti-choice, completely anti-gay, completely anti-health care.

He's carved out one teeny, tiny exception to his grotesque bigotry just big enough to squeeze his son through.

So yes, damn right I'll spit on him. He's still my enemy in every way but one.
49
I watch the news then I exercise. It provides a healthy outlet to vent the anger I get from becoming informed, as it is my duty to do. Sometimes it works better than others, but I highly suggest it- in addition to having my heart rate up, it provides me with time to think, consider what I just became angry about- things that get that much of a reaction from me are good things to examine in my mind's eye.
50
@11: Yeah, but celebrating despicable assholes just because they came around on your one pet policy issue isn't good either. The fact of the matter is that we don't actually need Portman or any of his associates to change their minds. We just need to wait for them to die off. Equality for sexual minorities is already a foregone conclusion, and until the culture has shifted thanks to generational turnover, we'll have broad legal protections to bridge the gap in short order.

@42: Unless you literally only care about equal rights for gay people with respect to marriage, Portman is in no way, shape, or form "on our side". He's still a racist, misogynist, Christianist, corporatist plutocrat who just happens to finally agree about some narrow policy positions because they might impact his gay son, whom he loves. He's not getting a cookie until he backs the broad social justice movement as a whole, something that intrinsically necessitates leaving the Republican Party (also possibly the Democratic Party), dedicated as it is to maintaining all kinds of social privilege. Similarly, I'm disgusted by Obama's continuing support from the nominal Left - the man's a war-mongering patriarchal plutocrat who insists he has the legal right to execute anyone - including Americans on American soil - solely on a top-level aide's say-so that the person is up to no good (okay, "terrorism", which is simply an ideograph and is thus wildly insufficient for a legal definition, even if any other part of the claimed assassination rights was acceptable). You're not electing people to rule or legislate on a single issue, and you need to stop acting like you are, for all of our sakes.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.