Red State blogger Erick Erickson said what every conservative politician is secretly thinking on Fox News last night.
[Erickson said] female breadwinners are antithetical to biology:
âIâm so used to liberals telling conservatives that theyâre anti-science. But liberals who defend this and say it is not a bad thing are very anti-science. When you look at biology â when you look at the natural world â the roles of a male and a female in society and in other animals, the male typically is the dominant role. The female, itâs not antithesis, or itâs not competing, itâs a complementary role.â
He continued on to lament that âWe as people in a smart society have lost the ability to have complementary relationships in nuclear families, and it is tearing us apart.â
He concluded: âHaving mom as primary bread winner is bad for kids and bad for marriage.â
Somebody go tell this fuckwit that "liberals" don't just fearfully worship science the way he fearfully worships his conservative Christian God. First of all, and most importantly, his oversimplified perception of the male-female dynamic in nature is painfully wrong. Secondly, if Erickson suddenly believes in being "true" to science just because he thinks that science agrees with him, his emulation of the animal kingdomânon-monogamous sex, violence, truly disturbing bathroom habitsâis going to get ugly very quick. I could spend all day on thisâI've written and deleted whole paragraphsâbut it's ultimately so stupid that it doesn't deserve a response. Go watch the full video at Mediaite.