Well a lot of people voted for Sawant (but assuming that she didn't have a chance) to "shake up the Council" and they may get their wish.

No doubt the radiator will speak once the powers that be figure out which way the wind is blowing. Ask Rossi.
it is hard not to project Sawant ultimately winning.

Unless, for some reason, ballots start to head more towards Conlin's favor (like the first 98,000 counted). Nobody promised they'd be counted in any particular order.
Fuck. Worst local election in a long time. Hard to see anything I like except for the expected victories (like O'Brien).
Time for mcginn to move to capitol hill and knock her out in 2015.
@3: Early voters tend to be older. Conlin's toast.
@3 You are wrong. Ballots are largely counted in a particular order: first in, first out. The Election night count consists largely of every ballot that arrived by the Friday before, plus some of those that arrive on Monday. The Wednesday drops consist of the remainder of Monday, plus some of Tuesday. And so on.

As we get near the end of the count and some earlier ballots that required remediation are added to the mix, the late ballot trend (if there is one) diminishes.

So why would late ballots differ from earlier ones? Younger voters vote late. Also, GOTV campaigns. And sometimes, elections simply have momentum. But at this point in the count, we are definitely seeing a huge difference between late voters and early voters in several key races. That's not random.
Three more long days of nasty, racist, red baiting snark. Thanks, veterans. I hope you're happy.
#6: Fuck you, you asshole. You told everybody McGinn was going to win.
@Goldie, the Yes on 522 folks were thinking they had a chance with late ballots. Update on that?
Goldy, I believe the "Ballots Returned" number at KCE is the number of ballots that have passed the first stage of processing, so there are more ballots that have arrived from USPS but aren't showing up in that number yet. KCE is still predicting 55% turnout and the Ballots Returned number suggests less than 53%.

So Sawant and Seattle Prop 1 may be doing better than your numbers suggest.
Looks like there's about a 69k gap left for 522, with ~148k ballots left to count. I don't know what the trend is, but it seems highly unlikely that that gap could be made up.……
Younger voters vote late.

And are certainly against $15/hr wages in SeaTac ?

Nobody is denying that there's a general order to how things are processed, accepted, and then counted. Ballots coming in Tuesday probably don't jump to the head of the line and get scanned that day. But I've never heard of a rule that "that stack of 10,000 ballots we couldn't get to last night has to be the first batch into the machine this morning". Or, "yep, we really do have to start re-making those ballots filled out with green pen that we'd set aside" can throw off the order.

But, hey, maybe I'm just having flashbacks to Rossi vs Greogoire or how McGinn's surge reversed course by 1.5% during the last count of the primary.…
@10 I haven't been tracking it (tracking statewide races are much more complicated, because you have adjust for where the ballots remaining are coming from), but it just doesn't look possible.
Good for Sawant. This is probably her only shot at a council seat as the Districts will work against her, and running against someone who isn't colins (i.e. a 4 term old white guy) would also work against her. But it would be interesting to see what would happen if she got elected.
Councilmember-most-likely-elect Sawant, I didn't vote for you, but I'd be a liar to say I wasn't looking forward to council meetings with you!
@15: just curious, are you dyslexic or just exceptionally bad at names? The dude's name is Conlin and in every post I've seen of yours you refer to him as Colin or Colins. WTF?

Or just typing angrily.
@ 13, Murray's count dropped 2 full percentage points at yhe same time, giving McGinn a net gain of .5% for that final drop. So I don't think you're helping yourself citing that post. And Rossi lost as Gregoire's numbers increased with each drop in 2004, so that also doesn't help you much either.
@19 - Then again, when has he ever let facts get in the way of his narrative?
@19, well, as long as we get the high drama of Conlin winning, a recount with Conlin winning, that count being challenged by the socialist party, Conlin winning again, and then another recount with Sawant winning. All the while every recount comes up with different totals. That would be super fun to see what they've done to change ballot handling procedures since 2004.
How would Goldy's margins work if the later ballots had Sawant down about 2% while Write-Ins went up to 1.2%, like the last count of the primary ?
I don't know, chief. How would Goldy's margins work if the later ballots had Sawant down about 2% while Write-Ins went up to 1.2%, like the last count of the primary ?
For example, Matt, If the votes for this race end up in the low 170,000 range, 10,000 voes for Sawant, 8,900 votes for Conlin, and a write-in surge of 250 votes would still give Conlin a win in a squeaker using Sawant-leading percentages like those seen Wed-Thursday afternoon.

You can be optimistic for your candidate, but let's not oversell the statistics.

Kshama is the new quinoa.
You can be optimistic for your candidate, but let's not oversell the statistics.

This is what people should've been saying to Conlin on election night.
@17, I guess just bad at names, for some reason I thought it was colins, thanks for pointing that out.
Which one will lose to Jamie Pedersen in 2015, the tension is thrilling.
The late GOTV effort by those meddling Sonicsgate kids will help. Conlin shouldn't have voted no, and shouldn't have been condescending about it.
"To what degree do our personal opinions cloud our judgement? Yale University researchers have attempted to detect and measure how our political beliefs affect our ability to make rational decisions. The study suggests that our ability to do maths plummets when we are looking at data which clashes with our worldview."…
This happened two years ago in the Seattle School Board with the race between Peter Maier and Sharon Peaslee. He was winning election night but every day it ticking away from him and to her. She won the race.

Also, side note but funny - the Suzanne Dale Estey campaign that, between her campaign and her PAC, raised over $200k? Her campaign is asking supporters for another $3k "to close the campaign debt." Wow.
Remember - has a ballot tracker - make sure your vote was counted!
"Oh yeah, well one plus two, plus one, plus one, plus two plus one, plus one, plus one!"
@33 - "Flames, flames, on the side of my face..."
I love how the vote counters will take three days off even though they haven't finished their job. Expect more of that kind of efficiency if your socialist wins.
Geez, guys, don't you check my math? I had an error in my formula, and none of you caught it. What's the use of having a comment thread if you guys can't occasionally make me look stupid?

Efficiency is counting the ballots in a calm and orderly way using the staffing you have, and finishing the job during regular work hours.

Inefficiency would be declaring a phony emergency, hiring a buttload of temp workers and buying additional equipment for the sole purpose of feeding an imaginary sense of urgency. King County has better things to spend the taxpayer's money on than ramrodding vote counts through any faster than need be. They don't even get sworn in until January. The only point would be to satisfy about two dozen obsessive politics wonks. The other two million people in King County don't give a shit.

This has been yet another explanation of How Shit Works for People Who Think They Know What Socialism Is.
Gosh, I forgot about the main reason our vote count system is the best: it gave Dino Rossi a big sad. Three times.

And counting ballots posmarked by midnight on Election Day gives all conservatives a big sad, year in, year out. Liberals procrastinate. Washington's system fakes out right wingers again and again. Take your blood pressure meds, guys.
Good analysis.
Though I think it's 3 dozen politics wonks.

Hey, I think they deleted a comment and renumbered them. I was responding to what is now 34, not 35.
It'll be sad if the Sea-Tac initiative fails.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.

Add a comment

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.