Comments

1
There's a time and place for sarcasm, but not when a kid is dead or molested.

NRA needs to drop its opposition to mandatory trigger locks, it would save so many lives.
3
Thankfully, the gun was unharmed. The sheriff's department will ensure that it will be returned for its owner's enjoyment as soon as possible.
4
nations with guns all over have many gun deaths. nations without many guns all over have far far far fewer gun deaths. the nations that really limit and control guns also do not have large swaths of their land so plagued by violence that kids can't play outside and you don't want to go there unless you have to live there. there is simply no analogue in Australia or japan to the high murder by gun zones of America's large cities. gun control works when it does result in reducing the prevalence of guns so accidents like this don't happen, so criminals find it harder to get guns -- no, they won't necessarily find one anyway, at least not if you look at japan, uk Australia etc. -- suicidal and enraged and drunk and irresponsible people find it harder to lay hands on a gun, etc. the facts and causal connections are so clear it's only through an organized drumbeat of verbal bullying by the gun loving crowd that this simple fact is made into something "debatable." gun lovers: tell me what part of paris has the murder rate of the south side? what part of Australia, an ethnically diverse nation full of eurowhites, Asians and people of color, has a murder rate like that of Anacostia? what part of paris is like Compton? None, none and none, and yet you keep arguing this point.
5
Americans are so dumb. The world laughs at you & considers you nuts, USA, for your insistence that everyday citizens have the right, the freakin' *right*, to own a device that takes a life. The deaths will simply continue so long as this "right" stands. The answer is not to make more restrictions on guns like the libs wants, it's to ban the mutherfucking things from the general public. End of story.

@4 gets it
6
@1 You're right. The real tragedy here is my closing bit of sarcasm. Thanks for keeping this all in perspective.
7
You never hear anything about the legal fallout from cases like this, probably because they're so tragically avoidable that everyone wants to push them out of their minds as soon as they're past the "news" window.

Presumably the parents of many kids killed in someone else's house sue the homeowners for wrongful death and the homeowner's insurance pays out, but the average policy only has $100,000 liability coverage. Do people lose their homes, savings, etc., to lawsuits?

I think some good years-long followup, using court documents, could open a lot of people's eyes.
8
The only safe gun is one in a locked safe.

I grew up with guns and gun safety, where each and every gun had its place in a locked safe or travel case. Seeing one laying around unsecured makes me horribly uneasy.
10
Dan finally got tired and bored with his pit bull and youth pastor watches, maybe Goldy will tire of perpetuating "because guns make you feel safer" watches as well -- it's probably just a matter of time.
11
The only sane answer to this minor inconvenience is "more guns." More guns! More guns! More guns!
12
@9 -- okay I am persuaded. let's continue to work for small bore gun control stuff that the nra opposes anyway and when we pass it the dems get voted out like in Colorado; if keep suppressing what we really think and want for an actual solution, eventually you know the gun lovers will become rational and see the light. that's your plan? the current gun control efforts aren't working did you notice attempts to ban gun show loophole in wash state only lead to a counter initiative? at a fundamental level the advocates of gun control are being too bullied and silence themselves into giving up their real point, their best argument: full on gun control works. and it's true the mini incremental measures short of that actually have just a marginal impact. we have a solid fundamental debate here and one side is afraid to speak their minds and stand up and it's not the nra side. this is how they win. they get us to silence ourselves. I won't go to certain parts of LA for salsa dancing unless a local clues me in on is that a gang neighborhood, but there isn't a single part of London or paris or Tokyo I'd be afraid in. Now, gee, why is that? if you run away form your basic truth, well then, you sort of can't expect to win in politics.
13
An obviously unsafe weapon. It should not be possible to accidentally discharge a shotgun. This isn't rocket science.

How about starting next year gun manufacturers will be held liable for accidental discharges by children. I bet that would drive some innovation in making a safer weapon.
14
...brought out a shotgun, it was loaded and somehow went off
Wut?
15
@8...your house wasn't safer than my house. We have no guns. My house wins.
16
Whenever you see "somehow the gun went off" or "it just went off" what that means is "someone pulled the trigger, causing the gun to fire."

17
UPDATE, 10:02 p.m. | The boy who Puyallup police say unintentionally shot another teen boy will be booked on suspicion of first-degree manslaughter, according to Capt. Scott Engle.~ The Seattle Times

The adult who owned the gun, and left it unsecured, though?

Fuck.
18
"Because guns make you safer."

Goldy, that has been covered over and over.
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…

"There is a difference between arguing the blanket statement that guns make us safer and arguing that guns can be used to defend one's self against death, serious bodily harm or tyranny."

Or is just the sarcasm at the injury of a child?
19
@13,

The gun manufacturers can be held liable for nothing. Thank the NRA for that.
20
Not exactly true, @19. They can still be sued for making a defective product, i.e., one which doesn't perform as intended. Killing people, though, happens to be an intended purpose, so you're out of luck there.
21
@18: States with high rates of gun ownership also tend to have high rates of suicide. You can't handle the truth! Don't kill yourself, you have so much to live for!
22
@21
My internet stalker who makes thinly veiled suggestions that I kill myself, you can ignore the examples of Japan and England if you want to. But they show that you are wrong.

You believe that stalking someone is a rational response when disagreeing with them.
http://www.thestranger.com/slog/archives…
"I promise to stop stalking you if you leave The SLOG and never return."

You had to be corrected on whether a negative suicide existed or not
http://www.thestranger.com/slog/archives…
"This doesn't mean that the number you added was negative,"

And then you demonstrated that you do not understand what a negative correlation is
http://www.thestranger.com/slog/archives…
"There is no such thing as a negative suicide, but there is such thing as a negative correlation."

I have an internet stalker.
And my internet stalker likes to make thinly veiled suggestions that I kill myself.
23
@22: I will happily be more direct in my suggestions, if that's what you prefer.

And by all means, let's have fun with misleading/hypocritical quote mining, and willful misinterpretation of direct contradictions to your preferred narrative! Should I go next, or would you like another turn?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.