@2: It's a state highway right through the heart of the economic engine that likely fuels whatever livelihood you have, which is why you get to help pay for its replacement. Suck it.
pretty confident SDOT and WSDOT will make the viaduct limp to the finish line.
just keep your eyes fixed on the glorious future, when trucks filled with chinese crap will cruise unhindered north from the port all the way up 99 to the traffic lights in green lake! it's going to be worth it.
@9 canoes are so 19th century. I want to ride a zip line down from Hamilton Viewpoint in West Seattle to the waterfront, where the moving walkway will whisk me away Jetsons style to Madison Park, so that I can take a sky gondola to Kirkland, to connect to the pneumatic tube network to whoosh me off to Redmond. Think multi modal or get out.
O'Biren said WSDOT might "move the goalposts", so got them to commit to answer very specific questions in a written report for the next briefing. He does want details why they do not consider the spots they measured 4/10-inch settling to be a sign of an impending crisis. That'll be a briefing to watch for.
@14 zip line Spider-Man style from West Seattle across the Duwamish, bay, downtown, east Seattle, Lake Washington, and all the way to say Bellevue? Forget commuting, I'd pay King County $50 for the fun of it.
"It's coming down in 2012. I'm taking it down -- the middle. That's the timeline. I'm not going to fudge on it. And if we don't have some alternative by then, boy are we going to have a mess on our hands because it's coming down." -Christine Gregoire, January 2008
Can we rebrand this thing already? Gregoire Gulch or Christine's Calamity, maybe. It seems like she's gone and been forgotten. McGinn was right: She cannot be trusted.
@18, exactly - no Nisqually earthquake, no 5 inches of sudden settling that day, no debate, no Cary Moon, no cut-and-cover, no legislative action, no McGinn wedge, no tunnel underway. Thanks earthquake!
@7, the products from China that enter our ports mostly leave here by non-stop rail straight to Chicago. The Port knows better than to use our roads (mostly because of how bass-ackwards Seattle roads are).
I find this amusing. The AWV was built above current specs (the engineers overbuilt it at the time basically), is safer than any tunnel in a liquefaction zone, and has withstood more seismic activity than intended just fine. But, since in order to replace it we have to scare people into believing it is a death trap, WSDoT has to physically undermine it to justify their pet project.
Stay classy, WSDoT.
now now.
admitting you are a retarded fuckup is the first step to fixing yourself.
don't make us roll up a newspaper and come spank your ass...
just keep your eyes fixed on the glorious future, when trucks filled with chinese crap will cruise unhindered north from the port all the way up 99 to the traffic lights in green lake! it's going to be worth it.
P.s. it had fucking better make that comical 'foop!' sound when it sucks you in, like on Futurama.
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default…
(From here.)
-Christine Gregoire, January 2008
Can we rebrand this thing already? Gregoire Gulch or Christine's Calamity, maybe. It seems like she's gone and been forgotten. McGinn was right: She cannot be trusted.
1/120th
I'm pro metric system, but that wasn't even hard.
I find this amusing. The AWV was built above current specs (the engineers overbuilt it at the time basically), is safer than any tunnel in a liquefaction zone, and has withstood more seismic activity than intended just fine. But, since in order to replace it we have to scare people into believing it is a death trap, WSDoT has to physically undermine it to justify their pet project.
Stay classy, WSDoT.
We should assume the 4/10th isn't a big deal until they can tell us definitely.
This certainly makes the West Seattle to Ballard monorail look a whole lot more sensible and cheaper.
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/viaduct…
Don't let gravity get you down.