And it would be a delicious target for terrorists, Charles. Not to mention you would have to take multiple elevator rides on a daily basis. You don't just go from 1 to 37, for example, you go up by express to certain floors and then take the "local" one. Imagine that with a load of groceries in your arms. It would be a miserable existance.
Microapartments might work very well for adults, or even for childless couples, and I know that the Japanese manage to live comfortably in apartments of much smaller square footage than the American average, but trying to put 1 or 2 adults and children in a unit of 250-350 square feet sounds absolutely hellish!
What exactly would one "manufacture" on a floor of a massive apartment building which would not have large amounts of waste generation, could get all the machinery/goods in and out easily without frustrating residents, and would be quite enough to not disturb residents?
Maybe these things do not occur to people who live in single family homes, I dunno.
Imagine instead a Columbia Tower sized apartment building, but with standard 1Br or 2Br units. A 1.5m sq ft, that's 2,500 500-700 sq ft apartments at a pretty livable density. No need to go micro to get exceptional density while retaining quality of life.
What if the daughter of the moron who lives next door uses hair product that smells like ass? And then when you knock on the wall and say, "Hey, can I get a courtesy flush over there?" they claim racism. No, good fences make good neighbors.
@18 Yes, an arcology is the ultimate building of this sort. A building that many people don't need to leave on any given day and some may spend a lifetime entirely within. An arcology should contain housing, businesses, parks, shops, schools, medical facilities, nursing homes, etc.
Micro apartments ... ppfsh, that's so 2013. The wave of the future is going to be "Housing Pods". Tenants will be awarded their very bathtub sized pod where they'll be suspended in a luxurious biotic gel solution whilst having their consciousness uploaded to the cloud. It's basically like the Matrix, but with more goo. You could stack over 87,000 hipsters into a building like that.
@25, we actually have an arcology here in King County. It's a very large rental housing/condo development in Federal Way, where drug dealers and prostitutes "couch crash" and get all of their food delivered to them. It is a slum, a ghetto, the region's Mos Eisley Spaceport.
To see the reality of an arcology as opposed to the fantasy, just go down and visit Camelot. You'll get a healthy dose of reality very quickly.
Look at the HOA dues for large buildings. Buildings of that scale—even a modest tower—are incredibly expensive to maintain and operate. Even a small unit would likely be out of reach to anyone of average means.
Seattle is never going to reach shoebox-apartment density, and it doesn't need buildings that will be torn down in 30 years. What it needs are proper 1 and 2 bedroom units built well enough that families and singles and seniors can all share walls without considering urban living a phase before "settling down."
When I was a student at Boston University, for a time I lived in Warren Towers, a three-pronged monstrosity which at the time was supposedly one of the largest dormitories in the world. It had a restaurant and a 24 hour convenience store on the ground floor. We students sometimes spent the whole weekend inside, going to study rooms to work quietly, down to the convenience store for snacks, seeing movies at the Warren Towers movie nights for dates, etc...
One of my dearest friends from that era lives in what she calls now the grown up version of Warren Towers, an apartment complex in Portland, Maine with a similar feeling. Sometimes these things work.
Kowloon was a shit hole for the most part. I've seen video of the food manufacturing facilities and it was terrifying. And Theodore Gorath is right, it sucked to live near a manufacturing site. Fumes, noise, trash, vermin...
Which isn't to say there's not a possibility of making high-density, multi-use buildings. But you have to do it carefully and Kowloon Walled City's unregulated mega-slum isn't a good model, no matter how much some people like to romanticize it.
As terrible as it was (apparently), I couldn't help but want to live in one of the block towers from Dredd. The smartest part of the film waa not depicting the vertical favela as some kind hellscape or broken utopia, but functioning human habitat. Teenagers hanging out, kids going to school, people doing what (little) work was available -- life was happening all the time, everywhere.
I wouldn't want to live on the floor under the fish ball factory. And this post plays right into the horror stories of Communism that my father regaled me with in my youth...the profound disregard for the individual. Maybe he was right. No like.
Sounds like the urban housing in Callenbach's Ecotopia. The corporates were kicked out and all the towers were commandeered as living and small manufacturing space, freeing up land in the cities to be reforested. He made it sound very pleasant. Folks could take the elevator down to the street, walk a mile or two into the woods and catch a deer for dinner!
I think you may be sharing too much here.
have cafes, bars, sex shops, and play areas for children
could become
have play areas for children, cafes, bars, and even sex shops for adults
which would avoid the creepy juxtaposition of sex shops and child play areas
Why not people-sized apartments for all the people (you know, human beings? Not cattle?) you expect to be living in there.
Maybe these things do not occur to people who live in single family homes, I dunno.
you have a point about the elevator rides.
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2014/11/an…
(or happy if YOU lived and worked in Kowloon)
https://www.youtube.com/guide_ajax?debug…
You know what you get when you have "floor after floor of people living as closely together as possible?"
Lots of excrement "that's radiant from the concentration of so many humans"
They're gonna need to fix Bertha so she can dig a sewer line to drain Charles' dream home...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge18Ieyi9…
To see the reality of an arcology as opposed to the fantasy, just go down and visit Camelot. You'll get a healthy dose of reality very quickly.
Seattle is never going to reach shoebox-apartment density, and it doesn't need buildings that will be torn down in 30 years. What it needs are proper 1 and 2 bedroom units built well enough that families and singles and seniors can all share walls without considering urban living a phase before "settling down."
One of my dearest friends from that era lives in what she calls now the grown up version of Warren Towers, an apartment complex in Portland, Maine with a similar feeling. Sometimes these things work.
Which isn't to say there's not a possibility of making high-density, multi-use buildings. But you have to do it carefully and Kowloon Walled City's unregulated mega-slum isn't a good model, no matter how much some people like to romanticize it.
aww, come now. I'm sure manufacturing fish balls smells wonderful. Most are made from surimi, the "chicken McNugget pink slime" of fish.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRsp6DhxL…
Each building like this, housing 5,000 people, will require a matching megafarm spanning ten square miles.
This dream can only survive if you assume farms are "nature," if you pretend industrialized agriculture is not a form of urban sprawl.
Put up or shut up, Mudede.