Excellent, I have some time. Let's discuss the men who want to lead our country. Just to start off clearly, does Hilary hold a specific job title as we speak? Shucks, she's a woman. How about you start? K?
Paul, I think Rand Paul strikes the GOP base as too much of a peacenik on military/war for empire issues. If he comes out for decriminalizing pot on the campaign trail, his goose is cooked. Plus, I don't think he has the political polish to stand over the long term in a national campaign. Right Wing yahoo's like Cruz win local and state offices, but don't play well in the national election. They betray enough symptoms of foot and mouth disease to destroy their own campaigns.
Jeb is preparing on the down low for his candidacy. He can best bring all factions of the GOP together to get the nomination.
wake me up in summer of 2016. until then, I could give a fuck who the GOP picks. I certainly can't/won't do anything about it.
@4: that the President is a "Wall Street Stooge" is a given. the question is, which Wall Street Stooge is least bad? America's not about to work some other way.
Herman Cain is definitely just entertainment. I can't wait to see the next lipsync parody.
If you really think Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton are equivalent - just like Al Gore and GWB were equivalent - then you really haven't been paying any attention. HRC leaves so so much to be desired and is so horribly flawed, but she's a no brainer relative to what you'd get from the most moderate (sane) GOP candidate.
If you insist on not supporting a Dem, by supporting a hopeless 3rd party candidate (Nader anyone?), just not voting, or worse, voting GOP, then you need to come out and admit (to yourself and everyone else) that you're just a nihilist who thinks the way to 'fix it" is to hurry up and blow the whole thing up the quicker to start over from scratch.
I have news: the .01% who own the GOP these days will come through the nihilist annihilation in much greater comfort than anyone else, poised to take an even stronger stranglehold on our collective throats than ever.
How dare you mention and criticize Ben Carson without mentioning that he's black! You're racist, just like liberals everywhere.
^That was my c_s impression. (Yes, he actually once called Paul Constant racist for criticizing Mr. Carson without mentioning that he is black.)
And now in honor of the late 5280 on the occasion of his birthday, I shall go drink a beer and not give a fuck. I imagine wherever he is, he's doing something similar.
@18 - doubt you're checking back, but the list of small, modest, incremental and perhaps unsatisfying but fundamental and successful changes brought by the flawed Obama administration is long and is in fact progress, unlike anything we'd have seen from McCain or Romney. Seriously. Do you think the revolution would have come and all the injustices and bullshit policies would have evaporated if only we'd allowed McCain to take us into war with Iran or Romney to finish gutting the tax code and looting the dregs in the treasury? No, we would still be right where we are, with the 99% paying the tab and holding the flaming bag of dog poo. Nevermind what kind of Supreme Court we'd have.
Idealistic nihilism is petulant and juvenile, at best.
Yes, I will gladly keep driving down the road listening to the awful grinding sound from the transmission, and be grateful to have the car and not be walking through the desert. Damn straight.
@9 It's not that. He said, "I could give a fuck who the GOP picks", meaning the apparent amount of fucks that he gives is some non-zero amount. Therefor your comment was an even more efficient waste of time as it was solely in response to his poor comprehension of language.
@Once again your answer is "Less bad is better than more bad." Which is true.
But we should be expecting and working towards "actually good." And we are not going to get that from a Democratic party that has a single core value of "slightly left of the GOP." You would think that losing the House because of low turnout 4 years ago would have inclined them to get active, go nuclear, or at least maybe put judicial nominations up for a fucking vote. But no, the doubled down on spineless whining. More than half of Americans did not bother voting. Maybe it is because they recognize that they are not being represented.
Progressives need a voice, and what we get from the Democrats is a bunch of shushing noises and Hilary "McGovern"Clinton.
@23 'But we should be expecting and working towards "actually good." '
Of course we should. Just as we should do our best to hold the line against sliding further into "worse".
However, throwing your vote into the shitter for a candidate that no one, including you, has done enough groundwork to give a reasonable chance of winning, fails all three tests.
Excellent, I have some time. Let's discuss the men who want to lead our country. Just to start off clearly, does Hilary hold a specific job title as we speak? Shucks, she's a woman. How about you start? K?
Jeb is preparing on the down low for his candidacy. He can best bring all factions of the GOP together to get the nomination.
@4: that the President is a "Wall Street Stooge" is a given. the question is, which Wall Street Stooge is least bad? America's not about to work some other way.
I think your comment is a more efficient waste of time.
If you really think Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton are equivalent - just like Al Gore and GWB were equivalent - then you really haven't been paying any attention. HRC leaves so so much to be desired and is so horribly flawed, but she's a no brainer relative to what you'd get from the most moderate (sane) GOP candidate.
If you insist on not supporting a Dem, by supporting a hopeless 3rd party candidate (Nader anyone?), just not voting, or worse, voting GOP, then you need to come out and admit (to yourself and everyone else) that you're just a nihilist who thinks the way to 'fix it" is to hurry up and blow the whole thing up the quicker to start over from scratch.
I have news: the .01% who own the GOP these days will come through the nihilist annihilation in much greater comfort than anyone else, poised to take an even stronger stranglehold on our collective throats than ever.
^That was my c_s impression. (Yes, he actually once called Paul Constant racist for criticizing Mr. Carson without mentioning that he is black.)
And now in honor of the late 5280 on the occasion of his birthday, I shall go drink a beer and not give a fuck. I imagine wherever he is, he's doing something similar.
Idealistic nihilism is petulant and juvenile, at best.
Yes, I will gladly keep driving down the road listening to the awful grinding sound from the transmission, and be grateful to have the car and not be walking through the desert. Damn straight.
But we should be expecting and working towards "actually good." And we are not going to get that from a Democratic party that has a single core value of "slightly left of the GOP." You would think that losing the House because of low turnout 4 years ago would have inclined them to get active, go nuclear, or at least maybe put judicial nominations up for a fucking vote. But no, the doubled down on spineless whining. More than half of Americans did not bother voting. Maybe it is because they recognize that they are not being represented.
Progressives need a voice, and what we get from the Democrats is a bunch of shushing noises and Hilary "McGovern"Clinton.
Of course we should. Just as we should do our best to hold the line against sliding further into "worse".
However, throwing your vote into the shitter for a candidate that no one, including you, has done enough groundwork to give a reasonable chance of winning, fails all three tests.