Comments

1
"If the Democrats were smart—like, Donald Trump smart—they could turn this ugly dust-up to their advantage by crafting a narrative that Debbie is a scary powerful woman, unafraid to speak the truth and demolish anyone who stands in her way, the Devil Wears Prada lady of politics."

Except no one would believe a word of it. DWS has presided over the loss of both houses of Congress (even as both of Obama's campaigns were big successes, and even given the current GOP's state of disarray). She jettisoned Howard Dean's successful 50-state strategy. And now she's so intent on coronating Hillary that she'll scuttle the whole debate schedule if she has to. I don't say that as any kind of Bernie true believer, either - I'd be happy with either Hillary or Bernie as our nominee, I just happen to think that a healthy debate gets voters excited.
2
Schultz was also a co-char of Hilary's 2008 campaign, but that doesn't mean she's in the tank for Hilary this time, right?
4
A better title for this would be "Neophyte Journalist Matt Baume Proves He Hasn't a Clue What the Story is".
6
It's that Debbie's jacket looks awfully dusty in that photo. What do they not have lint rollers in Congress?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.