Hillary and the Bimbo Vote
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
There are many reasons I will never vote for neocon, Hillary Clinton: her support for Obama's war on whistleblowers (Cate Jenkins, John Kiriakou, Jeffrey Sterling, Barrett Brown, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, Carmen Segarra, et al.), her support for private prisons --- dating from her support for Bill's Omnibus Crime Bill, her involvement in the overthrow of President Zelaya of Honduras --- and when those Honduran kids would predictably stream across the border several years later, they would be held at prison camps run by the Geo Group, a major donor to Hillary, her support for the offshoring of American jobs and replacing American workers with foreign visa workers (Tata Consultancy of India was a major donor to her when she was a senator), her help in creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership, etc. --- but when I have explained this to women over the age of 45 their eyes glaze over --- but when I mention that during the Clinton Administration it was forbidden for their people to publicly utter the phrase, "corporate welfare" --- they begin to pay attention!
Reminds me of a brief discussion I had a few years back with a woman in her 70s who nonsensically believed that Bernie Madoff's wife was a victim?
Even though I explained that if plenty of us realized he was running a scam, there was no way his two sons and wife couldn't know as well, but since they were profiting nicely from it, they kept quiet --- she refused to believe me.
Several weeks later Mrs. Madoff was caught illegaly attempting to offshore their court-frozen assets, and then she too was put on house arrest, with Bernie, and restricted from telephone and computer usage.
A typical bimbo . . . .
But I most certainly do believe a woman should be president in 2016.
Earlier today I saw a person kicking a can down Aurora Ave North; might be a good time for a photo op and a Stranger expose on people littering in Seattle.
And two more reasons not to vote Hillary:
From the article: "There are body counts, literally, attached to Trump rhetoric."
Be careful, you'll learn to love Trump.
This was the ultimate in non-serious. Hell, the organizers preferred Rand Paul to Trump. What a sham.
"In a 2004 article Tony Schinella broke down a lot of polling numbers ... pointed out that more registered Democrats voted for Bush than voted for Nader..."
It's basically a hate rally, because that's what the Trump campaign is about. If a frat has a Klan-themed party, it gets reported, and so should this.
Rather, why don't you edit it for the Stranger's?
A ridiculous question to ask you, but certainly no match for your foolishness.
They disagree with you, so they must be murderous psychos. Get a grip.
Are you supporting or considering supporting Trump for president?
@32: Was supposed to be directed at 9 and 12, not your comment @8. But they certainly are not very bright if they think this would have gone any other way based on the venue. It honestly looks more like elaborate trolling on their parts, but who can tell any more?
That's the actual question --- and the answer is that she was a declared Canadian citizen, and a voting citizen of Canada, and at that time the USA did not recognize dual citizenship. (All the other examples were American citizens who happened to be in a foreign country when they had a child, but were not practicing citizens of that foreign country --- major legal difference.)
Thank you, you misogynistic fullwit.
Made in China.
Sorry. Fingers must have slipped on the keyboard.
NEWSFLASH GENIUSES: Someone is giving Billion$$$ to countries that execute gay men for simply being gay; usually by hanging them or throwing them off tall buildings, often in front of cheering crowds. And who is supporting these barbaric, medieval, so-called 'relgious' regimes? HINT: It's ain't Donald Trump. It's your beloved current admin.