I don't understand. This bill is for tax breaks, isn't reducing taxes a main position of the tea party and Republicans? I'm asking sincerely here.

The "going rogue" party always hates a maverick in their ranks.

They're like piranhas. It's fun to watch them eat their young.

The more I read about this guy, the more I'm starting to like him.

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…

@1 They only like tax breaks when they're not endorsed by black presidents.

I don't understand how anyone believed that a man who could win a Senate seat in Massachusetts would vote lockstep with Tea Party politics. If Republicans were willing to ignore all of the evidence just to get rid of the supermajority Democrats weren't accomplishing much with anyway, that's hardly Brown's fault.

All I know is that "compromising" with America-hating Republic Party of No comrades means we got 18 percent of the original US job creation funding we were supposed to get from the House proposal.

If this is compromise, give me open warfare and ram it through with a 49 vote majority with the VP the tiebreaker like we did for CENTURIES.

The guy is in a vise. If he does not vote straight tea bagger votes, the New GOP will turn on hims and cut him to shreds. If he does vote straight tea bagger, Mass will never re-elect him. What is a Cosmo centerfold to do?

What @7 said.