@5 - but Chehalis is the winter wonderland escape for our state (at least that's what the TV keeps telling me) ...
My brother, who lives in NYC, and makes a lot more than I do, lives in an apartment the size of my KITCHEN. Supposedly, it's worth more than my entire townhouse ...
Well, considering that my relatives who live around there pretty much fit that description, I'd have to go along with your assessment.
And let us not forget the fact that, in many of these auction situations, that "top bidder" is generally a bank that the developer may owe $$ to, or that has interest in surrounding properties. They buy up the existing stock at more than what most people would be willing to pay in order to keep their "value" at close to market-rate, as well as to maintain that rate for the other properties in the vicinity.
Because, if they actually LET people buy condos at 50% of their stated value, well then, THAT would become their actual value, and that would have the effect of devaluing the entire property as well as drag down rates for adjacent properties, which means the developer wouldn't be able to charge as much for future projects, and the bank in turn wouldn't make as much profit on loaning them the $$ to build them.
you can buy a 4 br 3 story house in some cities in the US for $50,000 ...
Um, that describes pretty much anything there's a market for, you know.
http://www.redfin.com/WA/Chehalis/998-NW…
or if you don't like chehalis or aberdeen, tacoma should work just fine:
http://www.redfin.com/WA/Tacoma/3611-E-P…
it's only worth what we think it's worth.
My brother, who lives in NYC, and makes a lot more than I do, lives in an apartment the size of my KITCHEN. Supposedly, it's worth more than my entire townhouse ...
Chehalis is along I-5 at elevation 270 feet.
Well, considering that my relatives who live around there pretty much fit that description, I'd have to go along with your assessment.
And let us not forget the fact that, in many of these auction situations, that "top bidder" is generally a bank that the developer may owe $$ to, or that has interest in surrounding properties. They buy up the existing stock at more than what most people would be willing to pay in order to keep their "value" at close to market-rate, as well as to maintain that rate for the other properties in the vicinity.
Because, if they actually LET people buy condos at 50% of their stated value, well then, THAT would become their actual value, and that would have the effect of devaluing the entire property as well as drag down rates for adjacent properties, which means the developer wouldn't be able to charge as much for future projects, and the bank in turn wouldn't make as much profit on loaning them the $$ to build them.