Fuck amazon. That's all I have to say.

The bill got postponed, but has Amazon spoke regarding California yet? Looking to the future, what will retailers in South Dakota offer?

They're going to lose. Every state is basically fucked for budget and is going after any shred of revenue they can get their hands on. How long can Amazon hold out? 10 states? 30 states? Can they lose California? Texas? Florida?

None of these legislatures give two shits whether their constituents can buy from Amazon or not--as long as they get their cut.

Too late, Amazon. It looks like the tax-internet-sales-monster has been set in motion. Given that every state in the country is bleeding red ink, you will never be able to stop the momentum of this now.

Good for them, fuck the government.

Despite being unregistered, dept. of corections (#7) is correct. There are no "listings" on the site. These are the affiliate links that stay-at-home bloggers put on their pages. When someone clicks through and buys something, the blogger gets a referral cut. They'll stop getting these cuts now.

I know we can always hate on the Seattle hipster to hate on any business, no matter if it is local, successful enough to spread its influence beyond this tiny city. But can you at least be correct/rational about it next time?

What rationale does a STATE have to tax a business with no physical presence in said state? This is interstate commerce, which is a federal matter.

This doesn't even make sense. But for it to, Paul would have to understand something other than comic books.

Err. "count on the seattle hipster"

@8: I think you're confusing this with earlier Amazon practices. It sounds like Colorado was trying to pass a law which would consider affiliate websites based in Colorado as a physical presence for Amazon itself (which is really pretty reasonable).

The conclusion (no more affiliate sites getting their cuts) is accurate. I don't buy your other statement, though: A person purchasing a listing from a Colorado company should be taxed on that sale, even if the item ends up being delivered from Amazon.

@10: I don't think @8 is confusing anything.
Paul apparently does not understand the situation at all.

Amazon could stop paying all affiliates in every state and the experience of shopping on the site would be the same. You just might see fewer tagged links in blogs, etc., and people wouldn't spam comments and forums with tagged links in hopes of receiving referral fees.

@11 has it right. @10 (and Constant, of course) has no clue.

This is the closest similar scenario:

A dude in Connecticut uses Google AdWords. This establishes a physical presence for Google in CT. Some chick there buys a Nexus One from them online and the state taxes her.

Fair?