@6: Cuz' the guy is a cash cow for them, once his "public image" is properly reformed, he'll likely produce a nice profit margin for them again in the future. I believe they thought backing Tiger was the fiscally responsible thing to do.
Also, very smart marketing move leaving the questions unanswered, since apparently no one wants to hear him answer "Hot girls throwing themselves at me is awesome!", "Wow, this sure sucks." and "Don't get caught again!"
I think it's a great ad. If it makes us squirm, imagine what it does to Tiger. I think instead of taking the easy route of dumping Tiger like his other sponsors, Nike decided "we're going to keep you, but first you have to make this haunting ad with your dead father." It's Nike's way of making him pay, while preserving their codependent relationship.
And Dominic, honestly, the greatest tragedy of modern history? That must come as a relief to millions of Jews, Cambodians, Bosnians and Rwandans.
@7, not just Nike. Tiger is, for better or worse, a pillar of the economy. He's put hundreds of millions of dollars, maybe more, in the pockets of thousands of Nike employees, television executives, other golfers (PGA income would be down by HALF or more without him on the tour), and who knows who else. When he held his big press conference, trading on Wall Street ground to a halt. He's the most important American of the last fifty years. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing is, uh, up for debate.
It's a pretty smart move by Tiger. He is in public mea culpa mode right now, and he has a ready vehicle for public statements via his Nike endorsement contract. Given his well documented economic power, he could have dictated the theme of any of his Nike ads in the past decade. (Other than the "I am Tiger Woods" campaign, can anyone remember a Tiger Nike ad?) His team may very well have come up with this ghost chastisement concept and presented it to Nike, who would have jumped at Tiger doing any ad right now. I seriously doubt Nike pushed this on him.
really - with all that's happened in the last 50 years - Tiger Woods stand atop it all?! I can't imagine that, despite any economic impact he may have had (and how many shoes would Nike have sold with a different shill?). It may be debatable as to whether or not it's a good or bad thing that he is a large influence on the culture/economy, (I"ll go with bad) but it's absurd to me that he could even remotely be considered "the most important American" by any metric.
@23, no other American could stop the NYSE trading floor. Not Reagan, not Muhammad Ali, not Michael Jackson, not Anna Nicole Smith (the previous "most important American" leader).
The only thing interesting about this whole entire deal is that apparently there are poeple who are shocked to discover that powerful and/or successful men like pussy.
@25, it's got little to do with corporate shilling and everything to do with White America's state religion: golf. Tiger (ironically mostly non-white) is single-handedly keeping golf alive.
if you want to see something that might qualify as the genius of ad creators squandering their talent on something at least uplifting in the shilling of product see BA's ad combining Lakme's Flower Duet with some wonderful visuals:
Also, very smart marketing move leaving the questions unanswered, since apparently no one wants to hear him answer "Hot girls throwing themselves at me is awesome!", "Wow, this sure sucks." and "Don't get caught again!"
And Dominic, honestly, the greatest tragedy of modern history? That must come as a relief to millions of Jews, Cambodians, Bosnians and Rwandans.
no.
And now he's more famous than ever before.
Is there anybody working at the Stranger who understands how you make your living?
But yeah, it is kinda creepy.
@13 - most important american of the past 50 years
is it national hyperbole day - or missed sarcasm
He's just rich and good looking, and can get all the tail he wants. What is sociopathic about that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVi6GgQBk…