@1: Hahaha. But Joe, you have to give the RNC credit for so brilliantly making themselves so easy to mock. I mean, rarely do you see someone do as well at that as they do.
@1, so if we conclude that Fox is a defacto arm of the RNC, shouldn't the RNC at least be required to report the in-kind contributions they receive in their filings to the FEC? And, is the entirety of Fox's advertising revenue countable as political contributions, or should some of it be booked as lobbying expenses?
That was pretty good. I thought he was going to talk about the end table thing though. Stewart would have a much harder time doing the show without fox news.
Please, for the benefit of Canadian readers (there are quite a few out here), would you post a short description? The embed doesn't work for us, and it's annoying trying to guess what you posted.
Obviously, those FOX N00bs had never heard of the Bohr Model. http://physics.gmu.edu/~rms/astro113/ima…
Though that did bug me a bit, seeing as the "shapes" of atoms are truly closer to these. http://www.iun.edu/~cpanhd/C101webnotes/…
Drew