Comments

1
She asked repeatedly to be taken seriously. Balter (I'm not a fan of Joni Balter, generally) really wanted you guys to try to have a little respect for the way women feel on the street. What is so hard about that? Just give the point of view of other voices a respectful hearing instead of mocking and belittling them.

Oh, no. Can't do that. It's so much easier to be a dick.
2
Go for a walk on the riled side.
3
Oh did that comment piss me off. I wrote a letter to the show, not sure if you saw it Eli, but it basically said, 'I'm a short woman who wears high heels often and walks everywhere and I didn't like this legislation. It was political posturing.'
It feels like Joni will use any kind of strawman argument to make her point and I will not let her use being female as a reason this was good legislation.
4
Eli, if you find the shoes and set the date, you can borrow our baby to complete the outfit.
5
Joni needs to read her own paper:

Attack on mayor unwarranted

This is a response to “Mayor’s veto may scuttle measure” [page one, April 20].

When I read about City Councilmember Tim Burgess’ aggressive-panhandling measure, I immediately sent messages protesting the measure to him and City Council President Richard Conlin.

I pointed out that I am a frequent downtown visitor. I shop, visit the art museum, library and Benaroya Hall; eat, attend meetings, visit friends day and night and have not been aggressively panhandled by anyone. I am a 5-foot-2 senior citizen with no training in the martial arts.

The attack on Mayor Mike McGinn [“Missteps are mounting for Mayor Mike McGinn,” editorial, Opinion, April 21] was unwarranted, as were comments about City Councilmember Bruce Harrell.

— Jan O’Connor, Seattle
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/no…


Most of the speakers for the bill when it passed were men. In fact, all of them were, if I recall correctly -- I did space out for about 3 minutes while fighting with a broken button. Many of the speakers against were women.

And here in the Times again we have two women and one man: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/no…

Check the breakdown of their support. Women against, men for.

Joni is trying to stoke more fear while blasting The Stranger for stoking fear. More than that, she's playing the interminably sexist trope of "women are so weak and passive and frightened and oh god, we need to be protected".
6
Beware the distraction of this tactic, Eli.

The premise of the point, as you began to offer, doesn't hold. The evidence didn't bear out, and I can find nothing of evidence-based support for the measure. So, don't let this little challenge create a perception that it's so.

…oh…and women in Seattle wear high heels?
7
Again, elenchos is an ass.
8
Personally, I'd call BS if Balter insists on stilettos or something. Most every woman I know who wears those kind of heels takes a cab or changes into something more realistic for the street.

It's one thing to wear a medium heel or pump on the street. It's quite another to be in some ridiculous pair of high heels - particularly if you are claiming to be some sort of everywoman.

Besides, how many women in high heels carrying babies do you see?
9
@1 elenchos…again and again…you don't seem to know anything about the actual bill. You have on over-inflated sense of what it would accomplish.

The real danger here is making people feel like something has changed when it hasn't; that erodes public confidence in the streets and in the ability of government to do anything meaningful.

This is a red herring.
10
@6: It is indeed a trap. She's going to get them out there and these men will wobble. "Point" "proven".

@7: Welcome, future member of the BLOCKED BY ELENCHOS club! We have gift baskets.
11
What Catalina said... High heels PLUS a baby? That's just silly. I'm 5'2", and can be found walking downtown with either high heels OR a baby, and in neither case do I feel threatened by panhandlers. At night, by myself, when there's hardly anyone around? Okay, yeah, then I feel uncomfortable at times. But not from fear of "aggressive solicitation."
12
But Eli can still borrow our baby to make his point... ;-)
13
there is a gender divide on this whole emotional panhandling bill mess. and it would benefit some of the more strident commentators to consider that.
14
@5: All the people you mentioned aren't the people who voted on the issue. Or our big, overweight mayor.
15
@13: Yes, a large number of public speakers against this bill and many letter writers indeed happen to be women. Of any group, women seem to be leading the opposition in terms of actual citizens and not heads of any groups. Regardless, the primary defense of the bill now is that women need this bill passed more than anyone else.

It's clearly "Me Tarzan, You Jane" legislation.
16
Does anyone read Balter's publication anymore? Seriously, I do not know a single person with a subscription.

According to her, people who were against the most likely unconstitutional anti-panhandling bill are somehow arrogant and don't care about the safety of women.

Plus, who the fuck walks around Seattle at night in high heels carrying babies? Especially downtown on all the hills, in the rain?

Damn she is so full of shit.

Don't take up her offer. It is stupid posturing and is just an attempt to get away from talking about the real issues.

@1: She should not be taken seriously.
17
@14: Hi, you must be new to this governance thing.
18
Eli plays soccer, so I'm guessing his legs will look good in heels.
19
@13 is right. And Elenchos may be an ass, but he has a point. A small man is not subject to the same street conditions as a woman.
20
Again, this idea is so silly and a waste of time. What does it prove that you, as a guy, walk around in high heels? You won't get pan handlers, you'll get harassed by red necks from Monroe.
21
@ 10: "Welcome, future member of the BLOCKED BY ELENCHOS club! We have gift baskets."

and you'll never guess what we got in them there gift baskets.
22
This is ridiculous. I'm a woman. I live downtown. I'm not afraid of panhandlers. If I'm walking at home at night the homeless are not the people I fear.
23
Some women may indeed feel more intimidated on the streets of Seattle. And that has absolutely zero to do with the merits (or lack thereof) of this bill, as I understand it.

(My bona fides: 5'5", woman, has no baby and hates heels.)
24
I can't wait to see this video. I can already hear 'the Good, the Bad and the Ugly' theme song as the soundtrack! 'Gentlemen, er women, draw your babies.'
25
Excuse me, but is she implying that women do not panhandle? How about providing some housing and services for homeless people instead of vilifying them. She probably imagines that she is superior and more deserving than people who have no homes. Seattle belongs as much to them as it does to her.
26
I'm 5'3" and walk around downtown in heels all the time. I'm not saying I've never felt unsafe or vulnerable while doing so, because I have. But that's not the point. It doesn't matter whether the people who voted against the bill understand what it's like to feel "small in stature," because that has nothing to do with what this bill actually does. Balter's argument is a logical fallacy.

And for the record, panhandlers are the least of a woman's problems while walking on the street at night.
27
I'm glad to see, at the very least, that we can all agree that Elenchos is an ass.
28
all this talk about high heels is very stimulating.
29
If Balter were "serious" she wouldn't leave her self vulnerable by wearing high heels at night on any street. Does she really believe that bill would have protected her from assault? What did she think, that a cop would be posted every thirty feet? She's being a bit histrionic if you ask me.
30
In Toronto, I find panhandling is very much a daytime occupation, because that's when most people are out and about. By the time dark actually falls, most panhandlers are elsewhere -- finding their place to sleep for the night, getting dinner, something.
31
This is just plain silly. Balter's position, if taken to its logical extreme, would seek to outlaw any action that makes a woman of short stature feel "intimidated". For example: do short women feel "intimidated" if they're jostled by an unsavory-looking character on a crowded bus? Do they feel "intimidated" if their blind date seems kind of skeezy and wants to drive them home after dinner? Do they feel "intimidated" if their car breaks down on a lonely country road in the middle of the night and AAA says they're going to take more than an hour to get there?

I mean, seriously, where is a reasonable person expected to draw the line if "what makes a short woman feel nervous" is the only standard? A law like this has to be predicated on something more than one self-described diminutive person's anecdotally-inspired apprehension about walking down the street.

And since when has 5'7" been considered "short" for a woman? I always thought that was about average height.
32
Women who truly feel threatened want laws that work, not political posturing.
33
I completely understand that there's a gender gap in perception of safety. THE POINT IS that this legislation didn't actually do anything to make women safer, and that red herring needs to be exposed.
34
Balter's arguements are ridiculous. She has basically said that anyone smaller than a football palyer is at risk downtown. There have been hundreds of people who have commented on various blogs about not being accosted downtown and have worked or lived there for years. I would bet not all of them are male and all or almost all of them are not former linebackers.
35
Timothy, I didn't post anything in this thread about what the bill would have accomplished. I've said elsewhere I thought there was a chance that it might make a little dent in the behavior of the more aggressive panhandlers.

All I said here was that I think it's offensive to be a dick to women (or anybody) who says it is not safe for them alone on the street because of their small stature or whatever it might be that makes them appear vulnerable.

And it's insulting and condescending to dismiss that as merely a "perception" of safety.

And if you are a woman who has a different opinion, where do you get off attacking and marginalizing other women this way? Why is only your point of view valid and not theirs?

When anybody says they not safe, don't treat them like a child and tell them they merely feel unsafe, and it's only their silly perception.
36
And if you are a woman who has a different opinion, where do you get off attacking and marginalizing other women this way? Why is only your point of view valid and not theirs?


Fuck you.
37
(And I say so @36 with all due and necessary apologies to everyone else)
38
@35 elenchos...

Again, I support any and all measures that would actually improve the safety of women (and men). You continue to misrepresent, if not explicitly then by implication, the notion that this bill is worth the fight.

Attempting to argue that those of us who can see past the posturing here are mean to women is disingenuous. Argue better, please. Otherwise it's pointless.
39
If she's that scared she should move to the Eastside, where she can die in a hail of gunfire from the omnipresent street gangs and drug wars.
40
I am a pretty femme butch dyke and I would not walk around down near Pioneer Square or north toward Pike without a large group with me. Seriously, it is different, the way women have to be more externally vigililent. I dont think walking in high heels will really help men get it. any shoe I cant run easily in makes me feel more vulnerable, slip on shoes or any kind or clogs or sandals.
41
Hey you know what else is kind of bugging me?

This morning Eli Sanders said the Stranger has consistently supported increased police presence in downtown. The foot patrols and all that. And the mayor says he supports more police downtown, though he seems to be unwilling to make hiring cops a budget priority.

But if all this is merely the perception of unsafe streets, isn't it a huge waste of scare resources to send cops to patrol there? Are these cops supposed to arrest somebody's delusional fears?

If it's all just a crazy, paranoid perception, then these people who say they are unsafe should see a psychiatrist, and there's no need for any changes in public safety policy. Maybe that's why McGinn isn't taking any action.
42
Oh, please. I'm female and under 5 feet tall. The only thing to fear in Seattle is Joni Balter's irritating voice and uninformed opinion.
43
I think it would be hilarious if the Stranger, the Times, and other news groups commissioned an actual poll of 1000 women--include cell phone numbers, too--to see what people actually thought about downtown safety. But so no one can argue about the questions, editorial on each side has to sign off on them, Split the cost of the poll, everyone gets to post the results. Full 'tabs' and questions or whatever else is fully published as well.

Because frankly it will take something like that for everyone to just shut the fuck up already.
44
@41 After following your comments in the threads about the bill, its vote and the aftermath, you have finally said something that makes sense. I think it is odd that McGinn hasn't taken steps to put more police on the streets, especially when I remember him saying that was a priority when he was running for mayor. I think we need to distance ourselves from arguing about an issue that has already been put to a vote (unless it passes veto in the revote), and get on to telling the mayor to start taking a little more action on issues other than transit.
45
@44 Kind of hard for McGinn to do anything of the sort without budget, isn't it?
46
Balter also lied about Mayor McGinn giving out Mike O'Brien's phone number on the air. I heard the show and it didn't happen.
47
@45 Yes those kind of jabs get things done as well, huh?
48
Here's how to get the millionaire non-voting "stakeholders" from worrying about being panhandled by aggressive homeless people downtown ...

CHANGE THE CHANNEL FROM FOX NEWS!

There, solved it.

Now, go get a life.
49
@46 - thanks for the catch.
50
@47 yes, it does get things done by pointing out fallacies and silliness when they're uttered, so they don't get to really stand or catch hold by people who may take them at face value. Politicians on the left are actually starting to emulate the Internets in doing that sort of thing now. Today's "Why isn't McGinn doing something?*" *Despite the fact he has no budget, is tomorrow's equivalent of a Death Panel for Team Burgess to use.

See what I did there? ;)

I just wish people would stop shifting responsibility for this to McGinn. If Burgess were serious about cleaning up downtown, and not just getting political points, he'd stand up and say HE will get more budget to get more cops on the street. When will he?
51
I guess you are right. I didn't spend the extra time to say that we should keep pressure on the City Council as well. I was responding to a previous comment and I like to keep it brief. I wasn't trying to shift the responsibility, only keep pressure on the responsibility they all ( the mayor and all members of the city council) asked for when they took public office. But you are employing the same tactics as elenchos and beating up on commenters who you think disagree with you. I think we both might be on the same page, but when you throw out little snide comments in response you come off as a dick.
52
@51 I see your point. I usually try to not toss off little troll comments like that, sorry. But I honestly think I'm not like Elenchos, since I've been arguing the same points, not shifting them around to a new way to justify the law every time Fnarf or Baconcat or me or whoever shoots him down. He finally told me to just fuck off yesterday after I got him again, so I suppose he's "blocked" me now too. Anyway, this is basically why I'm against it, for what it's worth.
53
@52 Thanks. I read your point in the other posting and agree. I think Tim Burgess is playing politics with Mike McGinn, and the rest of the City Council is as well. I would like to see more money for foot patrols in problem areas. I also would like to see more action by the mayor. I was very supportive of him in the election, more than I have been ever before in any election. I went to see him speak several times and spent much time trying to get people out to vote. I haven't written him off, but I think he needs some more action and less talk.
54
I'm 5'4, and a woman. In fact, I live on 2nd. This chick is bogus. Maybe I'll come out and join you!
55
As a 5'2, 100 lb. woman, who spends her workday outside in downtown Seattle, I can assuredly vouch that "aggressive panhandlers" are of much less concern than, say, clumsy lawyers walking out of Starbucks with hot coffee.
56
I am a smallish woman who regularly passes through downtown at all hours and aggressive panhandlers have never been a problem. Street harassment is a big issue for me sometimes, but those men aren't asking me for *money*...Joni Balter's op-eds reek of someone who is so goddamn terrified of poor people she instantly sees them as a threat. It's really not hard to say "sorry, no" when someone spanges you. The worst reaction I've ever had to deal with was a little passive-aggressive cursing muttered under someone's breath. Boo-hoo, I'm so scared. Someone is whisper-swearing at me!
I *could* get behind a bill that uses cover charges at the clubs to fund a mandatory "I'm not a sexist asshole" license, complete with training on how to not harass women on the street. It would be an equivalent violation of our first amendment rights but I personally would find it a lot more useful than the ordinance the mayor rightfully vetoed. Enforcing the distracted driving laws would be great too.
57
Years ago, a friend of mine and I were walking from the Doghouse, trying to get to The Cloud Room before last call. We had stopped in an empty parking lot to smoke a joint, when all of the sudden we heard this voice screaming "I KNOW YOU'RE SMOKING DOPE! I NEED BUS FARE TO BELLEVUE!"

It was this insane woman in an American flag sweatshirt, extremely tight pants and a crooked wig. She came up to us and again demanded bus fare. She thoughtfully offered to perform oral sex on us in exchange for the fare, but we declined. She pulled up her sweatshirt and showed us her boobs. The gal was a real mess.

We gave her a few bucks and a hit, and sent her on her way. I wonder if she ever made it to Bellevue.

And yes, we made it to last call. I miss the Cloud Room.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.