Comments

1
Well, that's certainly a pretty strong condemnation of the Sarah Palin Defense.
2
I agree!!!
3
The shrill complaining is underway as the shift in political control continues from old to new, and the old keeps crapping their pants over it.
4
What's wrong from hearing from those who might be panhandled? We sure have heard enough about those doing the panhandling.
5
The Times is just upset they no longer rule Seattle through their "stakeholders" and that this means change.
6
Let's play "I'm more oppressed than you!"
7
Wow. Bruce might actually be getting some notice now.
8
Bruce Harrell just needs to walk around "looking vulnerable and docile." It's called acting! Then you learn all about the silly stupid fears and crazy paranoid perceptions of all these nutty SUV driving University Village yuppies who should move to Bellevue.

And then you never need to talk to them, listen to them, or mention what they say in your news reports. Acting!
9
Harrell is the "no" vote who took the biggest political risk and truly demonstrated independent thinking on this one. He forcefully spoke out against the panhandling bill due to its inefficiencies/ineffectiveness and also took note of the concerns the rights commision had with the bill as well
11
Harrell also kept his mouth shut and his ears and eyes open until the actual vote, which was quite admirable. He actually listens and thinks, not common in electeds.
12
@8: "crazy paranoid perceptions of all these nutty SUV driving University Village yuppies who should move to Bellevue."

still going on with all that?
for fucks sake dude, move on, you know just
let. it. go.

instead of going down that path.

Please wait...

and remember to be decent to everyone
all of the time.

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.