Good Morning Charles,
Beg to differ. It isn't that obvious. The former (the Nigerian) is a damn fool (he could have killed himself with that act) and the latter is a hypocrite, taking large sums of money (accepting subsidies from the Fed. Gov.) while bashing such under the guise of the Tea Party (against Big Gov. & subsidies). They have at least one thing in common, opening their mouths got them into trouble, literally and figuratively.
The only way the Nigerian could be worse @6 would be if he'd forced some other poor schmuck to swallow the cocaine on his behalf.
At least he was willing to take the risk all on his lonesome, unlike Didier, who has no problem taking other people's money in order to build a successful business, then claiming he hates the system that gave him all that money in the first place.
Clearly the Nigerian. They're both hypocritical shitheads (I'm assuming the Nigerian wasn't campaigning to legalize cocaine sales. If he was then he's just a shithead but is not a hypocrite) but at least Didier isn't making money by selling people poison. Of course I'm sure you meant Didier is worse because you're an idiot and have no idea whatsoever the kind of damage coke does to the poor inner city communities it's pushed on.
Beg to differ. It isn't that obvious. The former (the Nigerian) is a damn fool (he could have killed himself with that act) and the latter is a hypocrite, taking large sums of money (accepting subsidies from the Fed. Gov.) while bashing such under the guise of the Tea Party (against Big Gov. & subsidies). They have at least one thing in common, opening their mouths got them into trouble, literally and figuratively.
At least he was willing to take the risk all on his lonesome, unlike Didier, who has no problem taking other people's money in order to build a successful business, then claiming he hates the system that gave him all that money in the first place.
This guy should be arrested.
The limit on cocaine contributions in Nigeria is 3.5 pounds.