Comments

1
"From 1951 to 1960, there was an average of one filibuster and only four cloture votes during each two-year Congress. In 2009 alone, there were 25 filibusters and 39 cloture votes."
2
Don't take anything Bennet does seriously - he's going to be out of a job at the end of the year.
3
This is stupid. Get rid of the Filibuster moments before you're likely to become the minority? No, if you're going to take a chance at this do it FIRST! Do it when you first get into power so you can push through a pile of things before you lose power. At least then you get something done.
4
I just think they should be required to filibuster the old fashioned way. Reading from a phone book over night is a good deterrent.
5
@3 root; yeah, we sorta wasted the last two years.

oh, not "we." for the last 15 years or more, i've only voted the anti-incumbent ticket. for city council, my vote is a toss-up between "anybody else" and "somebody different."
6
When Democrats fall into this "you did it too" argument, they are cutting themselves off at the knees. This is a FIGHT, not a delicate negotiation, and the Republicans are UNPRINCIPLED. That's why they always win, and why they always laugh at us afterwards.

Kill the filibuster already.
7
No more phoned-in filibusters!
8
Vote to end the filibuster to come into effect in 6 years when everyone has had a chance to get fired from the Senate and it's up for grabs. That way the Republicans save some face and we end one of the most asshole rules in Congress.
9
Root @3: This is stupid. Get rid of the Filibuster moments before you're likely to become the minority?

The argument that we shouldn't remove or neuter the filibuster because it might be bad for the Democrats is not valid. The filibuster is bad for this nation, period, and that's the only criterion we should be concerned with.

That's also what Democrats should be concerned with. The Democrats are the only semblance of a "country first" party we have left. The Republicans are a "party first" party, with corporate donors a close second. (The Dems are hardly better, but they are.)

The Senate is a body where a state like Wyoming with scarcely 540,000 citizens has just as much representation as a state like California with almost 37 million citizens. This is the kind of arrangement that is more appropriate for a union of sovereign nations like the EU, an anachronism of the pre-Civil War days where people would say "the United States are". The filibuster only compounds the travesty of democracy that already is the U.S. Senate.
10
yup kill the fucking filibuster a/k/a "minority rule."

Didja know....

states with only ten percent of our population can have one third the senators? IOW we could have 90% of population represented in the senate in favor of ...oh, say DISCLOSE or national health care.... and the minority ten percent can block it?

This NON DEMOCRATIC feature of our 18th century constitution is the biggest diff. between us and every nation with national health care. we are a joke, constitutionally speaking, we do not even have majority rule with this unconstitutional practice in place and the democrats are the biggest fucking babies in the world of politics because they don't just vote to kill it TODAY. Which they could, ANY DAY.

GOP: not afraid to use power.
Dems: "oh, we don't like to use our power, that's what the GOP does. We prefer to be victims of the GOP, thank you, so it's okay with us if the progressive platfrom fails for decades as long as we keep getting reelected and then we come out to seattle and all you idiots cheer us on like sheep! We've convinced our own base to settle for failure, and it's a good gig!"
11
KILL THE FILIBUSTER.
KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!
12
The filibuster stops things from happening, and therefore has a conservative bias. At times it has helped us, but in the long run it is in their favor. Also, they've broken the minority's side of the old unspoken bargain: the majority allows it, the minority uses it sparingly. KILL IT, or at the very least make it much, much harder to use. And getting rid of secret holds should be a no-brainer.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.