Thats very odd. She has little or no acting abilities, so her only box office draw is being naked or semi naked in movies. If shes not going to be naked, whats the point of saying "Sure, lets see this movie, its got Jessica Alba in it".
wow. that's the most pointless thing anyone's ever done. plus, jamie is right. did they REALLY have to give the woman an even SMALLER, flatter stomach? for fuck's sake. shit like this is pretty, well, shitty.
They made her torso thinner and her boobs bigger. Check out the shadow under her breast. It gets bigger and darker in the nude pic, making her boob look much bigger.
I think she got a little butt-cheek lift in the process as well.
@22:
I was thinking that as well, but I'm wondering if the reason is simply that it's easier to erase the bra-and-granny panties if the contrast is a bit higher; something closer to natural skin-tone might have made the job a little more difficult?
Whoever did this CGI has never seen a real tit before, either. It looks bolted on. Look at that crease. While Alba has no doubt had dozens of plastic surgeries, her tits do not look like that.
Clearly Fnarf, the CGI-nerd who rendered out the clothing didn't realize that unsupported boobs aren't weightless; even the perkiest ones sag a little.
But then, it's entirely likely said nerd has never actually seen a boob in meat-space, so...
But even he wouldn't do that to Jessica.
when you're strapless, form follows function. anything that's going to do the job is going to look like that :-)
@22:
I was thinking that as well, but I'm wondering if the reason is simply that it's easier to erase the bra-and-granny panties if the contrast is a bit higher; something closer to natural skin-tone might have made the job a little more difficult?
But then, it's entirely likely said nerd has never actually seen a boob in meat-space, so...
You know you're getting old when those are considered "granny panties"