The government uses secret zeppelins - they call them Invisible Dirigibles - which are radar-transparent and filled with lots and lots of explosive Helium.
Compared to the conspiracy theories that Glenn Beck pushes on a nightly basis, the truthers sound positively rational. Beck claimed Obama intentionally caused the Deepwater Horizon spill, for crying out loud.
My two year old says no real firemen would ever say the f word. Especially on TV. Firemen are pretty much his whole world and I'm inclined to respect his judgment in this area.
Up here in Vancouver the Georgia Straight gives a lot of sympathetic coverage to the 9/11 Truthers, sadly. They posted this video last week as if it were the smoking gun. I wish the movement were a lot more marginal, but journo hacks like Travis Lupick keep trying to give credibility to the truthers. Lame.
Not to fuss, but there were precisely zero 747s involved in the attacks, black or otherwise (2 767s hit WTC and the other two hijacks were 757s). I mean, when in Boeing-land...
Okay check out the janitor who heard explosions below a lower level before the planes hit. That and the fact that the security system @ the WTC went down in the weeks preceding 09/11/01
Really - idiots!!(When you point a finger; 3 are pointing back at you) And Building 7 which was not hit and the emergency command center for NY city went down all by itself like a demolition of a building just like the 2 WTC towers...I am just saying I do not buy the official story.
I do believe that the Bush administration was complicit in 9/11. I think it's ridiculous to speculate on rigged explosives, etc, when all they had to do was *absolutely nothing.* Al Qaeda was putting all their resources in attacking America, and all they needed to succeed was for the pressure from America to let up for a few months. That's what Bush did, and voila: 9/11.
You may call me a fool, but I'm just going on the public record, and what is known. The WH de-funded the FBI's anti-terrorism wing, forced the CIA to put Al Qaeda on the back-burner, and ignored any information coming in that there was an imminent threat. The only other option would be that everyone in the Bush administration was a total incompetent. There's certainly good arguments for that, but I don't buy it. Sure, W has nothing but cheez-whiz between the ears, but Cheney is a malevolent monster of another sort. Whatever else he is, he's not an idiot.
But even if I *did* accept the argument that everyone in the WH in 2000/01 were complete idiots, it still makes them complicit in the attack, for they were empowered to prevent it & they didn't. The only argument to make against that is that they couldn't have prevented it, and that's where the TRUE "fucking idiots" come forth.
#13: You want to know what happened to Building 7? A fucking skyscraper fell on it, damaging the superstructure and starting fires that weaked the building to the point of failure. Christ, learn how to google. It's ok to look at non-Loose Change approved websites, ya know.
These people act as if 9/11 wasn't being watched in real time by tens of thousands of live witnesses spread across two states, and millions of TV viewers spread across god-knows-how-many networks. But I'm sure all those people are in on the conspiracy, right?
@ 19: Never chalk up to conspiracy what is perfectly well-explained by incompetence.
The best thing for the ex-Hippie Tea Bagger to wear when he's off his meds and into 9-11 Truther mode is a Tie Dye Tin Foil Helmet.
I'm selling them for only $99.99 each. Cash, of course, but I'd prefer Kruggerands. Dollars have microchips embedded in the strip nowadays, so pre-21st Century bills are best.
The only thing I learned today is that Paul Constant is in an idiot battle with idiots -- for the title of supreme idiot. Both are arguing an absolute certainty about something that is utterly uncertain.
Those of us in the rational realm can sit here and eat popcorn and wait for actual evidence from either side. ...Little of which has been offered.
But way to make yourself look like a tool, Paul. FUCKING IDIOT.
@31: I don't know how far you want to take this being certain about uncertain things, TortoiseTurtle, but as long as we're not talking solipsism, the NIST has done exhaustive work on the collapse of the towers. Gigs of publicly available evidence and analysis at http://wtc.nist.gov/
Since the WTC was bombed...in 1993...during the Clinton Administration (and on the day that "25 years of foreign policy experience" Hillary Clinton participated by going to a revival of Godspell ) and for 7 long years, we dismantled, rather than increased our intelligence gathering you'd have to start there, wouldn't you?
Bush was only in office a few months before having to deal with Clinton's FP mess...
you all may want to put a tinfoil hat on me, but one thing to consider is why the 3rd firefighter, who was quiet the entire time, suddenly chimed in with: "any of these buildings could blow up at any second". That's something you'd only say if you were under the impression that source of all those subsequent explosions were actually from explosives, not the loud sounds of a building collapsing.
@22 I had the same bullshit line about building 7, but I look at the wikipedia now, and I guess time is what it needed, because now I see there was a piece of building that knocked into 10 different floors? I totally get that fire alone doesn't cause a steel structure to fall, but that plus derbies larger than my home puts it well into the probability range.
...cause what would firefighters know about the sounds of explosions vs the sounds of a building just falling down, right? not like that's something they deal with all the time. they must be imagining things. WE, who never deal with that kind of stuff, OBVIOUSLY know better and understand that they are probably just "traumatized" and can't think straight. funny, though, how so MANY of them have the same traumatized stories that they tell quite lucidly.
people who are still railing about how stupid Truther's are REALLY need to get a life. is THIS who you need to berate to make yourselves feel better now? really? isn't there some hipster show on tv you're missing while you rant about this?
in partially related news i picked up don delillo's "falling man" at value village and allllmost put it down 6 pages in because of how "about 9/11" it is. can i call 9/11 cliche without sound like an asshole? anyway, i'm glad i didn't, because there's some perfect writing in it.
Thank you, Paul. It's good of you to call these idiots out even though you bring a lot of unwarranted abuse upon yourself for doing so. Truthers are, I believe, the absolute worst people in the world.
Furthermore, it's pretty clear that the official investigation was incomplete and intentionally neutered, and failed to probe a lot of places there should have been probing.
Of course a lot of truthers are idiots, but I blame the Bush administration for the fact that they exist. Everything about their role stinks to high heaven, but it has nothing to do with black 767s or death rays.
@33: Actually, the Clinton administration had collected a great deal of intelligence suggesting that Al Qaeda was planning a major attack, and specifically suggested that airliner hijackings were likely to be involved. When Bush took office, his people were given the intel and told it was urgent. They promptly proceeded to ignore the threat.
This is all well-documented.
This is a dumb, sarcastic article that lacks any substance. Debunkers can't debunk the science behind the controlled demolition theory, and the pile of evidence that backs it up, so they resort to tired tin foil hat cliches and invective. If anything, it's the anti-truther movement that is stagnating. The Facebook page, People United Against Crazy 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists, has 300 members which means it has added one new member since 3 days ago. The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Facebook page has 21,511 members today and that represents a gain of about 250 since yesterday. Also, those of you who agree with 19 are believers in the LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) conspiracy theory which is also counter to the official 9/11 Omission Report conspiracy theory. Loose Change isn't the only documentary to challenge the official version. Those of you who can get past your smug cynicism should watch 9/11 Blueprint for Truth http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=…
Also, those of you who agree with 19 are believers in the LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) conspiracy theory which is also counter to the official 9/11 Omission Report conspiracy theory
I (and I suspect overwhelmingly, we) know that.
And I don't "believe in" anything. I think there is evidence for a number of things counter to the official version, including what 19 brought up.
The main problem is that so many people- from "hologram planes" truthers to "la la I can't hear you" folks who lap up the official findings even though they're so flawed- decide what they believe, then hold sacred any evidence that might support it, while disregarding any that might contradict it.
Unbroken link for 9/11 Blueprint for Truth http://tinyurl.com/682ayk
44, Hologram planes is a ridiculous idea and there is also a disturbing amount of anti-Semitic blame Israel bullshit that is being put forward by some 'truthers'.
@44 Yes, I know. As is unquestioning acceptance of the official findings. That was kind of my point.
Another part of my point is that looking at this as if you've got to either buy the official version OR you side with those making a bunch of really far fetched arguments is simplistic and hurtful to the discussion.
#42 Add to that the well documented FACT that German, Israeli, French... inteligence warned of this plot in the DAYS, that's FUCKING DAYS people, before the attack, pathetic. It's worse than the Kennedy assination really, all the COINCIDENCES that happened to make it, and the subsequest force feeding of a mountian of lies right down our collective throat possible. Really, we are a nation of spoon fed idiots!
The government uses secret zeppelins - they call them Invisible Dirigibles - which are radar-transparent and filled with lots and lots of explosive Helium.
Argon, it's a noble gas, not a planet.
(ducks)
(talks in squeaky voice after Helium)
http://www.straight.com/article-352050/v…
http://www.william911.com/
Really - idiots!!(When you point a finger; 3 are pointing back at you) And Building 7 which was not hit and the emergency command center for NY city went down all by itself like a demolition of a building just like the 2 WTC towers...I am just saying I do not buy the official story.
http://www.earthcam.com/usa/texas/dallas…
You may call me a fool, but I'm just going on the public record, and what is known. The WH de-funded the FBI's anti-terrorism wing, forced the CIA to put Al Qaeda on the back-burner, and ignored any information coming in that there was an imminent threat. The only other option would be that everyone in the Bush administration was a total incompetent. There's certainly good arguments for that, but I don't buy it. Sure, W has nothing but cheez-whiz between the ears, but Cheney is a malevolent monster of another sort. Whatever else he is, he's not an idiot.
But even if I *did* accept the argument that everyone in the WH in 2000/01 were complete idiots, it still makes them complicit in the attack, for they were empowered to prevent it & they didn't. The only argument to make against that is that they couldn't have prevented it, and that's where the TRUE "fucking idiots" come forth.
Right, because eyewitness testimony is always reliable, especially when an incredibly traumatic event has just happened.
Christ.
@ 19: Never chalk up to conspiracy what is perfectly well-explained by incompetence.
I'm selling them for only $99.99 each. Cash, of course, but I'd prefer Kruggerands. Dollars have microchips embedded in the strip nowadays, so pre-21st Century bills are best.
Is that related to the defacto "oil standard" economy?
The only thing I learned today is that Paul Constant is in an idiot battle with idiots -- for the title of supreme idiot. Both are arguing an absolute certainty about something that is utterly uncertain.
Those of us in the rational realm can sit here and eat popcorn and wait for actual evidence from either side. ...Little of which has been offered.
But way to make yourself look like a tool, Paul. FUCKING IDIOT.
Since the WTC was bombed...in 1993...during the Clinton Administration (and on the day that "25 years of foreign policy experience" Hillary Clinton participated by going to a revival of Godspell ) and for 7 long years, we dismantled, rather than increased our intelligence gathering you'd have to start there, wouldn't you?
Bush was only in office a few months before having to deal with Clinton's FP mess...
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/
people who are still railing about how stupid Truther's are REALLY need to get a life. is THIS who you need to berate to make yourselves feel better now? really? isn't there some hipster show on tv you're missing while you rant about this?
Furthermore, it's pretty clear that the official investigation was incomplete and intentionally neutered, and failed to probe a lot of places there should have been probing.
Of course a lot of truthers are idiots, but I blame the Bush administration for the fact that they exist. Everything about their role stinks to high heaven, but it has nothing to do with black 767s or death rays.
This is all well-documented.
I (and I suspect overwhelmingly, we) know that.
And I don't "believe in" anything. I think there is evidence for a number of things counter to the official version, including what 19 brought up.
The main problem is that so many people- from "hologram planes" truthers to "la la I can't hear you" folks who lap up the official findings even though they're so flawed- decide what they believe, then hold sacred any evidence that might support it, while disregarding any that might contradict it.
There are things in a building that explode when compressed.
44, Hologram planes is a ridiculous idea and there is also a disturbing amount of anti-Semitic blame Israel bullshit that is being put forward by some 'truthers'.
Another part of my point is that looking at this as if you've got to either buy the official version OR you side with those making a bunch of really far fetched arguments is simplistic and hurtful to the discussion.
I've linked to this before. Try watching the doc and then tell yourself that the government did everything they could to prevent 9/11.