Comments

1
The State Constitution clearly says (sorry, cite not at my fingertips) that it takes mere majority votes in each house of the legislature to pass a bill, any bill, including bills to raise taxes. There is no proviso in the constitution that would allow that requirement to be amended by initiative.

When I worked in Olympia some years ago, after a successful floor vote on a bill, the speaker would intone: "The bill having received a constitutional majority is declared passed." With this Eyman bill in place, the speaker is supposed to say: "The bill having received a constitutional majority is declared NOT passed"?????

This initiative (and its similar predecessors) is clearly unconstitutional, but timid legislators have chosen to not present a good case to the state supreme court. Perhaps they suspect that the justices, all politicians themselves, would find it hard to rule correctly on what in the past has been a popular initiative.
2
Done and Done. Shocking I know, as I am allegedly a tax hating conservative monster.

How is this one polling?
3
decipimur specie recti.
4
Eyman.

Need we say more?

If Evil has a Name, it is Tim Eyman.

Please wait...

and remember to be decent to everyone
all of the time.

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.