Dear Stranger readers,
2020 is finally behind us, but our recovery is just beginning. Reader support has ensured that our dedicated and tenacious team of journalists can continue to bring you important updates as only The Stranger can. Now we're imploring you to help us survive another year. Ensure that we're here to ring in our upcoming 30th anniversary by making a one-time or recurring contribution today.
We're so grateful for your support. Thank you.
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Sign up for the latest news and to win free tickets to events
Buy tickets to events around Seattle
Comprehensive calendar of Seattle events
The easiest way to find Seattle's best events
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Comments
What's the point of taxing a guy with two pennies to give another guy a penny when the cost of living is a dollar, and 3 percent of the people have a hundred dollars?
Right now, Washington State has something like a 19% participation rate in higher education, meaning 80% of our kids don't go into any kind of higher education. Now, we're going to make it even more expensive, driving that number into even worse territory.
The other thing is Governor Gregoire called for this same thing last year in her State of the State address. Then, she called it Tuition Flexibility.
The Legislature can't fund the Financial Aid our state currently offers. They cut almost half of the Financial Aid programs we offer last year, and most are on the chopping block for this year. Why on earth would anyone think we could increase financial aid to meet this coming increase in tuition?
The costs are too high if a summer job and part-time employment during the school year can't cover tuition, fees, books and reasonable room-and-board at a state school. Bring back the huge subsidies for higher ed. The poor and middle-class students deserve them, and the wealthier parents should get a chance to recoup a little of what they pay in taxes.
http://dailyuw.com/2010/3/12/undergradua…
That is, do students who enter school debt-free and at the same socioeconomic level graduate with the same amount of student loan debt, whether they go to Yale or Michigan State?
My guess is no, the former carry much higher debt burdens than the latter. But why actually, you know, look at results in the form of data when neat models are available, allowing you to wind into a post some really absurd point about socialism?
Um, when did they end?
You can presume all you want, but as of 2009, Penn (and I believe the other Ivy League schools) has eliminated student loans from its aid portfolio. Thus, regardless of income, students will not graduate with debt. The facts are the facts.
But, all this comes with a huge caveat. This model can only work if it comes with an adequate commitment to funding financial aid.
it is the securitization of college loans, and student aid which, like those CDOs and zillions of other types of credit derivatives in residential loans, commercial loans, auto loans, credit card charges, etc., etc., etc., profit the banksters by the continuation of their peddling securitized debt (debt-based financial instruments), hence all those debt-financed billionaires, while shoveling their debt onto the rest of us (while they convenient, unethically and amorally hold onto their ill-gotten "profits").
That's all it is; has nothing to do with education or anything else, for that matter.
Good post, Goldy.
Few among us have the fiscal discipline needed to do what you have to so that your kids and yourself stay in the middle class - live in a cheaper neighborhood than you can afford, save and invest (not bonds or money market, but stocks at the cheapest expense ratio like 0.2 pct) 10 to 20 pct of your income, and put your kid(s) thru college without burdening them with debt for the first four years (grad students can get jobs to pay for their education).
When I will look back on this failed century of the American Fall, from my retirement homes in Vancouver BC and Paris, it will be with sadness that Americans are such sheep.
(1) healthcare hedge funds which speculate on ALL areas of the healthcare sector (utilizing ultra-leveraged speculation via securitized financial instruments (i.e., securitized debt);
(2) private equity firm leveraged buyouts on all areas of the healthcare sector (utilizing structured loans, i.e., securitized debt); and,
(3) criminal behaviors by criminal corporations such as Pfizer, Eli Lilly, HCA, Cigna, Merck, etc.
Of course, Wall Street is the frigging problem: the peddling of modern day snake oil, that is, securitized debt, creates all those criminal debt-financed billionaires who own the flipping US Congress.
Try to catch a clue.....