Comments

1
I think Davis should just open up a strip club right inside of an elementary school.

But if the strip club has to go then so does the catholic church. If we are going to protect our children then let's be consistant.
2
Leave Jiggles alone!
I personally would never bother going to a strip club, what with free naked chicks on the internet and all, but this whole "across the street from a school" excuse is misguided. School gets out at 3 or something and Jiggles doesn't open until 6pm. There are no racy posters outside of Jiggles, the windows are mirrors, there's no way any kid is going to get a peak inside. Let him have his business, it's better than Seattle getting sued and having to pay out, which just means more taxes for you and me. Let him be taxed instead, and provide jobs for his staff and security. I live right down the street and have no problem with Jiggles at all.
3
But if children see women who are at other times and places naked they will be destroyed. Damaged beyond recognition. Without the constant vigilance of airlock parents children will become aware of human sexuality before the naturally ordained age of thirty, and that can't be allowed to happen.

But really, I blame the parents, who should be escorting their students directly from the classroom to the SUV and whisking them straight home to their basement practice rooms, not letting them hang around outside, bumming cigars off of these porn performers.
4
Being a horrible parent will scar those kids far more than seeing a naked woman or hearing a naughty joke.
5
Overturning outdated puritanical ordnances while making a healthy profit at the same time? Sounds like he’s doing god’s work, to me.
6
Kids who go to Whittier Elementary in Ballard get to walk home past the Sands on the corner of 15th and 75th. The most I ever thought when I was a kid was "show girls what?"
7
Yes, because other than Jiggles, the U-District is a pristine environment, 100% free of any vice that might damage the psyche of impressionable children.

* eyeroll *
8
I have zero problem with all of these things:

1) cute girls in skimpy clothing

2) trolling the city government

3) wasting as money tax payer money as possible via aforementioned trolling

If I lived or worked in the U-district I'd be more worried about the UW crime alerts that steadily flow into my washington.edu email box. All those homeless kids give much less of a fuck than your average stripper.

And I'd rather live next to a strip club and a boarding house for teenage methheads than within a mile of a single fraternity. Fraternities are infinitely more disgusting to me than any strip club.

Grow up U-district. Grow up Seattle. Good work Mr. Davis.

Keep on Jigglin'
11
If you put this to a popular vote, my sense is that Jiggles would win in a landslide.
12
@11 good thing we live in a Republic and not a Democracy then, @11.
13
I would realllllly like to know who the fuck the business owner who said: “It’s a crock of shit the city hasn’t shut it down yet.”
because I want to make sure I'm not supporting their business.

Any guesses? only thing I can think of is either the Foam Shop, The typing school or perhaps the chiropractor?

I highly doubt it is the cat adoption place though, but I would be devastated if it was....(insert pussy joke here)
14
Jiggles should be shut down for its horrible name.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.