Comments

1
Darn. Kinda thought we got rid of this guy already...
2
That's a lot of cases still left to be decided. And some of them were argued after it was clear that Sanders wasn't going to be on the bench. Although I know they couldn't have had Wiggins sit and hear them on 11/16 or 18, it's a little frustrating.
3
At the rate he's blazing through these cases, he's still going to be on the bench ten years from now. Can't they change the locks or something?
4
Also, what's the source of this "working for free" information? Not that I don't believe you, Eli, but I'm just curious.
5
@5: Source is the spokesperson for the Washington State Supreme Court. Sorry, should have made that clear in the post.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.