I am clearly missing something here. Checked out the blog and it's just typical batshit crazy conservatism. Is there something in the picture that I'm not seeing? Am I going to feel really stupid for asking this?
I saw the Elizabeth Warren thing, and read it, and started trying to untangle that mess of a comparison before stopping after I realized the only thing I'd find at the heart of it was a lump of shit.
Dude has supplanted intelligibility with angry political bile. But, hey, at least his advertising works.
He sounds snarky. He might even be one of those smart, non-hypocritical conservatives who actually believes what he says all the way through. Should be entertaining, at least.
It breaks down in the middle. People paid *money* for things that helped her be hot (though of course there are those to whom it comes naturally), so why should she have to repay them with *sex*? (Conservatives advocating prostitution now?)
If she makes any extra money because she's hot--say she works as a model, or her boss just pays her more because he likes her looks--then she will pay taxes on that. If a guy buys her a dozen roses to get her to bed him, he'll pay sales tax. So she *does* give back to society in exactly the same way the factory owner in the original argument does. If thought through logically, it's a case in point.
I almost posted that over there, but I don't want that lunatic to have my e-mail address.
He is a lunatic. I made a HUGE mistake, and posted a comment along the lines of "you're a lowlife dipshit, and for you to make that analogy is appalling." Unfortunately, it had my name associated with my email address, and he was able through the powers of google find my school email address, where he emailed me and is threatening to contact people at my school for my "vulgar" comments. Pretty comical really...
Only if he has Euthanasia insurance, because I sure as fuck am not paying for someone else's procedure. That would be SOCIALISM
http://rabidrepublicanblog.com/2011/09/2…
But don't read it just after you've eaten. In fact, it might be best to be drunk when you do. And keep a bucket ready.
http://rabidrepublicanblog.com/2011/09/2…
Dude has supplanted intelligibility with angry political bile. But, hey, at least his advertising works.
Referrals
Bodies of people killed by Mexican drug cartels β Bing Images [4506]
Yahoo [4217]
Google [790]
Slog | Seattle News ... [648]
Leaving Facebook... ... [628]
Seattle Columns - Savage Love [398]
AOL Search [314]
AOL Mail [176]
Model from Ukraine has been stoned to death [168]
Comcast Search [94]
It breaks down in the middle. People paid *money* for things that helped her be hot (though of course there are those to whom it comes naturally), so why should she have to repay them with *sex*? (Conservatives advocating prostitution now?)
If she makes any extra money because she's hot--say she works as a model, or her boss just pays her more because he likes her looks--then she will pay taxes on that. If a guy buys her a dozen roses to get her to bed him, he'll pay sales tax. So she *does* give back to society in exactly the same way the factory owner in the original argument does. If thought through logically, it's a case in point.
I almost posted that over there, but I don't want that lunatic to have my e-mail address.