Are they taking their prayer breaks in addition to other breaks? If so then yeah, I can see the point. But then I've been one to equate religion on the job as being the same as religion in schools. Great if you want to practice it but keep it out of the work place and public arena.
I would need more information about this before making to big of a deal out of it.
Hertz workers are not required to clock out for activities such as cigarette breaks, prompting the union to charge that the new policy amounts to religious discrimination.
From the Seattle Times article linked in the Morning News (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/lo…), it looks like everyone is allowed 2 paid 10-minute breaks per day. According to my very limited understanding of Muslim prayer requirements, only two (possibly 3? depending on sunset time?) of their prayer times would have to fall within a normal work day. Still couldn't figure out from either side's statements if the employees in question were trying to take two 12-minute breaks, or five 30-min. breaks. (Never mind that, at <$10/hour, it's probably not costing Hertz a whole lot of money)
@16 God goes up in smoke. How a cab company in liberal Seattle decided that you could smoke on the job, but not pray to god. Then get some god botherer to go about how we are pushing god out of our lives.
Seems like there should be a way to work this out so they can pray. It doesn't take that long.
Ziggity @ 19 -- And the essential difference is . . . ?
There is a labor issue here - but it's not religious discrimination. It seems that the employer (or at least its immediate supervisors) first failed to enforce standard legislated and negotiated breaks policy, and then unilaterally enforced the same policies.
The employees' complaint might succeed, in which case Hertz and all other similarly situated employers will stand advised to never ever cut similarly situated employees any slack in the first place.
Sooo the Times article doesn't say anything about workers not having to clock out for other types of breaks. Do we have proof of that? I think that's the most relevant issue here.
I don't see this as religious discrimination; the company is insisting they clock out for their breaks and the employees are refusing to do so. What they do on their breaks - smoke, pray, beat off - is irrelevant. If it's enforced unfairly (if smokers aren't required to clock out, for instance), that's a whole different issue, but if employees are required to clock out for breaks and are not doing so, I think Hertz is within their legal rights.
That being said - hey, I hear Hertz has job openings!
It's two short prayers during the work day. The cost to the company is damn near zero. And you can bet that smokers are having cigarettes more than twice a day and not clocking out for it. And that's fine! But any job where you have to account for every minute so closely that you can't step out for a cigarette or pray to Mecca is a crappy job, and more power to the union for standing up against their parsimony.
@30: Explain exactly how religion is detrimental to one's health. My religion often helps keep me in a good state of mind even when I'm under a lot of stress, improving my overall health.
First of all, ALL workers should have to clock out whenever they take additional breaks whether it's for smoking, or whatever. BUT, smoking and praying is NOT the same. Smoking is done when convenient. Praying is done at specific times. Still, for the sake of "fairness", a company should just clock everyone out for "personal time" whenever an employee does something like smoke, pray, etc. And it should be understood that the timing of the activity should be at the discretion of management.
I lived in a Muslim country for many years. Muslims have a sense of entitlement when it comes to their religion. They expect that every one has to make allowances for their behavior when it comes to religion (whether it's prayer, or Ramadan, or not eating pork in their presence, etc.) but they have very little tolerance for anyone else.
I would need more information about this before making to big of a deal out of it.
That there is what you call a slam-dunk.
What's Local 117's angle? Do they anticipate a settlement where everybody - Muslim or not - gets paid breaks at Muslim prayer times?
The usual Slog. There's no gray area in this world. Every story has only one side.
Seems like there should be a way to work this out so they can pray. It doesn't take that long.
There is a labor issue here - but it's not religious discrimination. It seems that the employer (or at least its immediate supervisors) first failed to enforce standard legislated and negotiated breaks policy, and then unilaterally enforced the same policies.
The employees' complaint might succeed, in which case Hertz and all other similarly situated employers will stand advised to never ever cut similarly situated employees any slack in the first place.
That being said - hey, I hear Hertz has job openings!
And yes, I have. I didn't like it.
@35 use the bracket punctuation for irony. [!] or [?]
I lived in a Muslim country for many years. Muslims have a sense of entitlement when it comes to their religion. They expect that every one has to make allowances for their behavior when it comes to religion (whether it's prayer, or Ramadan, or not eating pork in their presence, etc.) but they have very little tolerance for anyone else.