Comments

101
If this was a Husky Game at Husky Stadium, this wouldn't be news.

And you all know it.

Whiners.
102
Wow, there's a ton of overheated pearl clutching all over this thread.

Personally, I wasn't impacted, but I don't think I would've cared all that much. But I also don't hemmorage over Critical Mass, plus I live in West Seattle and deal with bridge issues all the time especially while the Spokane Street viaduct project is ongoing. It was a worthy cause, and definitely more worthy than pleasure boats.

With that said, while I agree with the cause, I think it's stupid to get in the way of people who are commuting. As others have pointed out, it's the 99% that you're impacting here (and at rush hour no less) and it's not in a positive way. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
103
It's amazing how people who believe they are Right and True can ignore the obvious. The simple question is did last night's action increase or decrease support for the Occupy movement and its larger goals? According to every single person I have spoken to about it and most everything I've read, the answer is "absolutely not." How is that anything but disastrously bad strategy? They spent several hours pissing off a large section of would-be supporters, the kind of working class, real world people the Occupy movement MUST have on their side in order to ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING (and it doesn't matter if this was a joint protest--it was widely perceived as an Occupy-driven phenomenon).

Also, a point about this stupid "but rich people float by in their yachts and nobody complains about it!" thing...First off, I'm guessing that a lot of the time, the boats coming through the cut are related to businesses of one kind or another, and are not populated with evil millionaires. I see commercial ships of various kinds moving through all the time. And of course, they never raise the bridge during rush hour.

And finally, one can be incensed about a yacht making everyone wait AND incensed about a bunch of well-meaning but profoundly misguided protesters causing unnecessary delays. It's not an either/or proposition.

So please, just stop. Admit that last night was a problematic--and possibly disastrous--display of idealism over pragmatism, otherwise known as The Curse of Liberalism (and I'm a liberal, by the way).
104
@99: "The police assisted because they knew they couldn't stop the protesters from assembling and corking the bridge."

Huh? The SPD are unable to stop a group from taking over a bridge? If that's the case, then the SPD needs serious training. Guess what, the SPD can stop all sorts of things. The allowed and assisted the occupying of the bridge.

"half-hearted effort"? Whatever. here's an example of a UW alert sent to employees:

"The University of Washington Police Department is expecting a large Occupy Seattle protest tomorrow afternoon beginning at about 3:30pm at Montlake Blvd NE and NE Pacific Street.The protesters will have speakers at this rally presenting on how the economy has impacted them.They are then planning to move from the sidewalks to the street and march onto Montlake Bridge at 4:30pm, blocking bridge access until forced off by police.

This could potentially have severe impacts on patient/visitor access, ambulance, Metro and commuter traffic.Law enforcement are actively planning to mitigate the impact of this event and maintain traffic access. Alternative commuter routes to the North and West are not expected to be affected, including access to I-5 via 45th Street.Metro and DOT have been notified, as well as Seattle Children’s other potentially affected entities.Please notify your staff, clinic patients and other interested parties as needed."

(As previously mentioned organizers worked with police and it was decided to go to the Univ bridge instead of the Montlake bridge.)
105
Let me summarize all the negative comments on here: WAH WAH I ONLY BELIEVE IN CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE WHEN IT'S CONVENIENT TO ME!! IT TOOK ME AN HOUR LONGER TO COMMUTE FROM WORK ONE DAY OF THE FUCKING YEAR! WAH WAH! WHY DO THE PROTESTERS HATE ME! THIS IS WHY PEOPLE HATE THE LEFT WHICH UNTIL TWO MONTHS AGO WAS COMPLETELY INVISIBLE! WAH WAH!

You people are fucking pathetic.
106
REAL democracy is messy and slow people! Keep it up Seattle!!!
107
Phoebe, @ 41 and elsewhere, you can un-knot your panties over your imagined "life-threatening situation."

Rest assured, EMTs and ambulances and all ER vehicles were WELL AWARE of the need to find another route last night. They were, what do you call it... informed!! You might try it sometime, it's really fun!!

Baconcat @56 FTW, big-time.
108
89: You're an entitled pussy.
109
60 percent of Americans don't identify with OWS? Big fucking deal, few causes enjoy support from more than 40 percent of Americans. Do you think 40 percent of the population supports the Democrats or the Republicans? Really?
110
@103

"Last night was a problematic--and possibly disastrous--display of idealism over pragmatism, otherwise known as The Curse of Liberalism."

Well said.
111
110: Oh yes, we'll make sure stage protests in out-of-the-way, low-visibility and convenient locations next time (where there won't be any imagined/hypothetical ambulances). You geniuses keep talking about how OWS needs to be more creative and smarter. Well, why not give us some suggestions other than "call your local elected official, send out mailings, go door to door and vote" and all those other wondrous activities that have utterly failed to slow down or fix any of the problems this country faces? All i hear from you is what's wrong with the OWS and activism in general; I hear no actual suggestions. And let's fact it, if a OWS platform was actually presented to you, you probably wouldn't even read or you'd dismiss at as untenable. You know that's true, but instead you all disingenuously play this "pro-message, anti-tactics" charade. The fact is you don't really want real action to be taken because it might cause you problems or challenge your assumptions about things. I imagine most of you are employed and have insurance, and the status quo is fine. Because if you didn't think that you'd be mad as hell and probably out in the streets with the protesters. It's not tactics you're afraid of; it's the prospect of change, of citizens taking charge of the process instead of outsourcing it to millionaire politicians. You're still worried about polls and spin, and not about the substance of the issues.

The "curse of Liberalism" is what liberalism, both classical and contemporary, is all about. The curse includes a plurality of opinion, a free and open society, a right and responsibility for civic-minded citizens to assemble and advocate on their own behalf, and a robust defense of the democratic/republican system of government from corruption and cronyism. You call it a curse because it doesn't appeal to a bunch of right-wing douchebags and "angry white men," but instead asks that we demand more from our government.

(eagerly awaits glib remark or restatement of the obvious)
112
104. My UW colleagues and I never got such an alert. In fact, I notice the spacing and punctuation's rather sloppy for an allegedly official UW e-mail release. I'm willing to argue that you fabricated that for your comment and assumed no one would/could call you on it.
113
"They are then planning to move from the sidewalks to the street and march onto Montlake Bridge at 4:30pm". The only news I saw of this was re: Montlake Bridge on Slog. At some point during the day it changed. So most people who would have been aware, and made contingency plans, were then caught off guard. It is also not clear from the union web sites that the intent was to actually block the bridge. But, whatever, if we were inconvenienced, it doesn't matter, we should just be grateful that our consciousness was raised while sitting stuck in the street, trying to get home. Right?
114
113: Oh, cry me a fucking river. Did you miss you favorite sitcom?
115
@114: Have you ever worked a long hard day? Been completely exhausted after a twelve hour shift and close to falling asleep at the wheel? I don't think so, but you're right: I would have been pissed to miss The New Girl. Actually though, if everyone here is a bougie as you're accusing them of being, they probably A.) Have a DVR or B.) Don't have cable and just listen to NPR.

A fundamental lack of empathy really makes consensus building difficult.

116
@114, yeah, there are only two choices here: support a bridge occupation, or watch sitcoms. Herein lies a fundamental problem with many supporters of OS. We are either required to unquestioningly support occupation, encampment, and blocking streets, or we are uneducated or ignorant tools of the 1%. No nuance and nothing in between. It is completely possible to be aware of the issues, involved in making change, and also disagree with OS and/or its tactics - or even agree with them, but disagree with *this particular action*.

And for all you know, maybe I was made late to relieve the home healthcare worker to care for my ailing father with stage 4 Alzheimers (she gets paid a bundle + overtime, that I can barely afford). Or late for my second job, which is hourly pay, and I got docked and yelled at by my boss, because I thought this was all going to happen on Montlake, so I took the University Bridge instead to get to work (oops). Or perhaps it was my turn to host my bi-weekly Marxist-Leninist reading group (we're currently working through a series of white papers and articles by Stathis Kouvelakis on Marxist interpretation of events in the EU and the response of contemporary leftist trends). My group was left waiting outside in the cold and I couldn't get my vegan lentil bake in the oven on time. Having a bunch of cold, hungry communists in my living room did not make for a productive discussion or planning session for our participation in next week's actions (we debated joining the bridge action but consensed that it was misguided, and we'd rather focus our efforts on leaflets and strategizing for the Olympia actions). Or, sitcoms. Maybe it's all just about sitcoms.
117
103/schmacky: It's amazing how people who believe they are Right and True can ignore the obvious. The simple question is did last night's action increase or decrease support for the Occupy movement and its larger goals? According to every single person I have spoken to about it and most everything I've read, the answer is "absolutely not." How is that anything but disastrously bad strategy?

Assuming that this action did decrease support for the Occupy movement, I'm not sure that matters to the people who took part in, or were in favor of, this action. I suspect they feel that people shouldn't have been pissed off at being inconvenienced, so they don't care if people were pissed off.

As far as the bridges being closed to traffic when boats go through, I find that as annoying as I'm sure most people do, but as the Seattle DOT website points out: "Federal law gives marine traffic the right-of-way over vehicular traffic." and the website also notes that "to keep roadway traffic moving during peak driving times [7:00 to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 to 6:00 p.m], bridge openings are restricted" so at least the yachties don't get to inconvenience others during rush hours.
118
@15 what the fuck makes you think i am happy about thurston howell and his yacht?
119
@75: There is a group of students and faculty currently working to resolve this issue. The University of Washington is affiliated with five different banks with Bank of America being the main one. Only one of these five banks is local. Thank you for concern and rest assured that there is a group of well-educated and equally concerned people working towards change on campus.
120
I don't know why this isn't spoken of as a potential solution more often... but why don't we look at the success of the 1950's and do what FDR did in 1942 that was directly responsible for it... Its time to bring back "maximum wage" that was rescinded under Regan. The solution is so simple and elegant that it's almost disturbing. Only allow these CEOs and business owners to make a certain amount more than their lowest paid employee.. do you think they want to stop making money? No. So what would happen? Raises for everyone in America... wake up siblings...

    Please wait...

    Comments are closed.

    Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


    Add a comment
    Preview

    By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.