It's funny, because by the title and cover you would think it was hilarious and clever. Oh wait, no, you wouldn't. But thanks for confirming my book-by-its-cover judging.
It's hard to decide which is the most off-putting factor: the pathetically "zany" cover, the title, or someone from a magazine no self-respecting person (read: man) reads acting as if he's some sort of expert or celebrity whose exploits people would want to read about.
Douche bag writes a douchey book. So what? I can think of 100 authors who are more insufferable than this. You could have reviewed Rachel Maddow's new book, but no, had to make a beeline for the lowest common denominator. Hey Paul, maybe next week you can review Snookie's new book!
Wow, as someone who enjoys irreverent jokes, I find this shit painfully unfunny. I have such ambivalence toward Vice, I really like the stuff Shane Smith does with VBS, but it seems like the majority of the articles I read now try way too hard to crack lame jokes.
Only ironically.
Right, this guy represents conservatism the way the Trailer Park Boys represent the Clinton Democrat.
Is this really what american men thrive to be?
Never heard of Tucker Max either.