Comments

1
What's with politicians who only want to run for president of their own fan club?
2
looks like Scott Brown is more of a coward than we thought
3
Really 56 votes for not a tool of the left? Have you seen their primetime? Sharpton, Shultz, Maddow, O'Donnell
4
If objective truth is an impossible goal, then it's probably best to have MSNBC and Fox News battling it out. I'm not a media expert, and I considered myself a conservative before GWB got elected, but even I can see what a debauched and propagandistic entity Fox News is. In my view, MSNBC is a polemic, but doesn't go to the extreme that Fox News does. I would prefer Fox News didn't exist, but at least they aren't allowed to operate unchecked.
5
I thought it was a snake, not a scorpion.
6
Talk about a "weak-kneed, pansy-assed, hand-wringer" I think Brown qualifies.
7
Um, if you don't feel comfortable arguing your case in front of people who are probably going to disagree with you, you shouldn't seek a position of public power. Maybe try to lead a self-selected group, so you can be sure everyone's there because they like you? A book club maybe.

tl;dr 1 and 2 have got it. @5, I've always heard the scorpion version.
8
So Maddow, Schultz, Sharpton, are not left enough? It appears that at least 1/2 of you feel that way.
9
@7 All Brown is asking for is a neutral referee. He ruled out the far left MSNBC, but didn't insist on Fox News.

It's not like _any_ of the news media is going to bring up Warren's fake Indian scandal or the plagiarism scandal.

Typical Warren question: what's cuter, puppies or kittens?
Typical Brown question: have you stopped beating your wife yet?
10
@4: I'm sure it's quite sad, from your viewpoint, that you feel the need to protect your convictions and political dispositions by preferring that Fox news did not exist – and so, as I would suspect, prevent them further than poisoning the ear of the masses? I suppose that's the result of your stances being on shaky ground, for they must be, but for what other reason would you want a media outlet removed from the marketplace of ideas?
11
@10 - Because that entire purpose of that "marketplace" is not to promote good ideas, but to serve up slop like: "Obama deserves great credit for repealing DADT, but he (like [Rmoney]) will never sanction same sex marriage."
12
@10, as I tried to indicate at the beginning of my post, if objective truth were possible, IMHO there would be no need for a 'marketplace of ideas'. There would only be true and false. I was, in fact, arguing for a plurality of ideas in the 'market' as the second best option. I am gratified that we seem to agree on this point. Fox News has had a monopoly on (radical) ideas for far too long.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.