Books Aug 2, 2012 at 4:47 pm

Comments

1
Then what will Chris Traeger say?
2
I am literally confused to death by this.
3
I am figuratively over the moon with this post!
4

Rilly !

5
Please also add 'basically' to the list.
6
I *really* agree. Adjectives are very easily overused. Usually, the -ly words basically clutter up the writing.
7
@1 beat me to it. I love the way Chris Traeger says it: "Litch-ra-lly"
8
So, you put your foot down on using the word 'literally,' but you'll still post every gossipy, inane flotsam uttered about Sarah Palin?
9
Basically, I'm actually literally loverly with adverbs.
10
awesome
11
I am literally enthralled by the Blue Angles.

Oh, and those jet guys too.
12
You also use "disingenuous" and "hopefully" as flabby placeholders way more than you used to. Some commenter gave me shit for pointing and laughing at it the other day, which pleased me.
13
This post is literally Hitler.

And no, I won't stop making 'literally' jokes. I prefer the humor to actual progress.
14
@8, it's flotsam and jetsam. Flotsam used alone is actually wrong.
15
This literally made me want to jump the shark.
16
@14: I heard 'flotsam' used by itself on Star Trek: The Next Generation. Given that, it must be a perfectly cromulent word.
17
No comment until Brian Boitano makes his opinion known.
18
@14 Also: my 1944 Websters New Int'l Dictionary says you're wrong.
19
The comments on this post were literally predictable
20
This is literally the dumbest Slog post all week.
21
18: I think you need to stay away from the thesaurus. You sound like one of those Glen Beck fans who bust out the dictionary anytime they need an archaic or rarely used word to underline their purported intelligence.
22
Disagree. "Literally" can be hilarious when used correctly. Misuse should be punishable by stockade.
23
@2, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, 19, & 20 Up against the wall, all of you!
24
rootwinterguard, way to stand up for those fantastic words. Bravo.
25
But I miss "literally" already! Could I use litter-ily? As in: I litter-ily threw my phone out the car window after reading the post? Or maybe: The driver behind me had to be litter-ily carried away on a stretcher? How about liter-ily: The paramedics liter-ily saved the driver using blood transfusion? Or: The tallest paramedic was leader-ily a foot taller than the rest of us and liter-airily exhaled orders as the victim rolled latterally into the maw of a medical system that would looter-ily and littler-ily resize his bank accounts? I picture you with flames shooting from your ears, lit-ear-ily and lit-eerily longing leeringly that "literally" has been laid direly in its literary grave. But it's, you know, a little early.
26
I'm going to start saying "laterally" instead.
27
@16, OMG like I read your comment and I'm seriously sorry about my claim.
28
I have no problem with the use of the word "literally" as long as it's literally used correctly...
29
I'm with you, Paul.
30
Once I wrote a column (back when I wrote a column) with "literally" in every sentence. Literally!

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/night…

31
Language peeving is literally the least attractive trait that educated people can have.
32
@30: Thank you for making it evident in the first two sentences that reading any further would be a complete waste of time.

@31: Yes! Thank you!

33
@26 I just laterally shat myself laughing.
34
Can we also get rid of the language hic "like.."
[Like] Seriously, we need to make that go away.
35
Mr. Constant, why stop there? Let's struggle to walk with care around adverbs in general...
36
"Literally" is the new "totally."
37
Eh...it's six in one.
It is what it is.
38
Sarah70 @ 14 Flotsam is the wreckage of a ship, Jetsam is stuff purposefully thrown overboard. The words may be used together most of the time but that doesn't mean they don't exist as separate useable words. You're wrong. What intrigues me is how you thought you could be so correct.

While we're on the topic of certainty and banishment, I submit for your consideration the phrase "I know! Right?" This appears to mean "I corroborate your assertion with certainty, but I just want to confirm your approval because my certainty is contingent upon you liking me."

weak-dick bullshit.
39
Boring topic.
40
@38 lighten up. She was corrected and she responded gracefully. You, however, come across as a jerk.

Your post was literally informative up until the third sentence. Then, instead of leaving readers thinking, ‘huh, now I know something I didn't before,’ readers are left thinking, ‘huh, he's such a jackass.’

Lighten up and quit being so aggressive. This is SLOG for [god's] sake, not redit.
41
@40 Sorry everyone. I missed the graceful response and my jackass just overflowed.

I'll crawl back into my lair of bitterness now.
42
@41 all's well. Keep us informed, we like to learn new things.
43
@41: I too have the problem with Jackass-overflow. Some day, someone will make a support group for people like us.
44
Hi, my name is clashfan and I'm a jackass. I've been jackassery-free for three days now.
45
Who the fuck cares about this? It's an invented outrage that serves to differentiate the elite from the not elite on linguistic terms.
46
@12 I was literally only giving you friendly shit about it - a tease, if you will. (I am totally not being disingenuous when I say that, either.) Hopefully you'll pick up on that next time.
47
@38, I once met a girl who claimed to have coined the term 'I know, right?"

...

...I know, right?
48
@45, I distinguish people who at least attempt to use proper grammar (spelling, punctuation, etc.) from those who do not. I do make judgments about their education level, and sometimes their intelligence, from these markers. I'm not going to apologize for that.
49
@48

Overused words, who's colloquial meaning is somewhat different than their dictionary meaning, aren't grammar, and aren't spelling. Most of these words are completely benign, and using "literally" in casual speech doesn't say anything about educational level or intelligence. It's a ham handed and completely invent shibboleth wielded by people who need to feel some artificial sense of linguistic superiority.

If we're strictly speaking about widespread grammatical errors, then I agree, something needs to be done, but I don't think a war on malaprop and colloquialism is the best use of time in that regard.
50
I'm Back!
@45,48 apparently the Books editor of the Stranger disagrees to some extent. Shibboleth - fantastic word, but (in the modern sense at least) the same could be said of your "elite"-dropping.

Either language has meaning (and we're judged by it) or it is just space-consuming self-important spew without meaning. I've been judged to be a jack ass; I'll cop to that. But if anyone thought I was literally a jack ass then they were actually doofuses.
51
oops - 45 & 49, that is.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.