You also use "disingenuous" and "hopefully" as flabby placeholders way more than you used to. Some commenter gave me shit for pointing and laughing at it the other day, which pleased me.
18: I think you need to stay away from the thesaurus. You sound like one of those Glen Beck fans who bust out the dictionary anytime they need an archaic or rarely used word to underline their purported intelligence.
But I miss "literally" already! Could I use litter-ily? As in: I litter-ily threw my phone out the car window after reading the post? Or maybe: The driver behind me had to be litter-ily carried away on a stretcher? How about liter-ily: The paramedics liter-ily saved the driver using blood transfusion? Or: The tallest paramedic was leader-ily a foot taller than the rest of us and liter-airily exhaled orders as the victim rolled latterally into the maw of a medical system that would looter-ily and littler-ily resize his bank accounts? I picture you with flames shooting from your ears, lit-ear-ily and lit-eerily longing leeringly that "literally" has been laid direly in its literary grave. But it's, you know, a little early.
Sarah70 @ 14 Flotsam is the wreckage of a ship, Jetsam is stuff purposefully thrown overboard. The words may be used together most of the time but that doesn't mean they don't exist as separate useable words. You're wrong. What intrigues me is how you thought you could be so correct.
While we're on the topic of certainty and banishment, I submit for your consideration the phrase "I know! Right?" This appears to mean "I corroborate your assertion with certainty, but I just want to confirm your approval because my certainty is contingent upon you liking me."
@38 lighten up. She was corrected and she responded gracefully. You, however, come across as a jerk.
Your post was literally informative up until the third sentence. Then, instead of leaving readers thinking, ‘huh, now I know something I didn't before,’ readers are left thinking, ‘huh, he's such a jackass.’
Lighten up and quit being so aggressive. This is SLOG for [god's] sake, not redit.
@12 I was literally only giving you friendly shit about it - a tease, if you will. (I am totally not being disingenuous when I say that, either.) Hopefully you'll pick up on that next time.
@45, I distinguish people who at least attempt to use proper grammar (spelling, punctuation, etc.) from those who do not. I do make judgments about their education level, and sometimes their intelligence, from these markers. I'm not going to apologize for that.
Overused words, who's colloquial meaning is somewhat different than their dictionary meaning, aren't grammar, and aren't spelling. Most of these words are completely benign, and using "literally" in casual speech doesn't say anything about educational level or intelligence. It's a ham handed and completely invent shibboleth wielded by people who need to feel some artificial sense of linguistic superiority.
If we're strictly speaking about widespread grammatical errors, then I agree, something needs to be done, but I don't think a war on malaprop and colloquialism is the best use of time in that regard.
I'm Back!
@45,48 apparently the Books editor of the Stranger disagrees to some extent. Shibboleth - fantastic word, but (in the modern sense at least) the same could be said of your "elite"-dropping.
Either language has meaning (and we're judged by it) or it is just space-consuming self-important spew without meaning. I've been judged to be a jack ass; I'll cop to that. But if anyone thought I was literally a jack ass then they were actually doofuses.
Rilly !
Oh, and those jet guys too.
And no, I won't stop making 'literally' jokes. I prefer the humor to actual progress.
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/night…
@31: Yes! Thank you!
[Like] Seriously, we need to make that go away.
It is what it is.
While we're on the topic of certainty and banishment, I submit for your consideration the phrase "I know! Right?" This appears to mean "I corroborate your assertion with certainty, but I just want to confirm your approval because my certainty is contingent upon you liking me."
weak-dick bullshit.
Your post was literally informative up until the third sentence. Then, instead of leaving readers thinking, ‘huh, now I know something I didn't before,’ readers are left thinking, ‘huh, he's such a jackass.’
Lighten up and quit being so aggressive. This is SLOG for [god's] sake, not redit.
I'll crawl back into my lair of bitterness now.
...
...I know, right?
Overused words, who's colloquial meaning is somewhat different than their dictionary meaning, aren't grammar, and aren't spelling. Most of these words are completely benign, and using "literally" in casual speech doesn't say anything about educational level or intelligence. It's a ham handed and completely invent shibboleth wielded by people who need to feel some artificial sense of linguistic superiority.
If we're strictly speaking about widespread grammatical errors, then I agree, something needs to be done, but I don't think a war on malaprop and colloquialism is the best use of time in that regard.
@45,48 apparently the Books editor of the Stranger disagrees to some extent. Shibboleth - fantastic word, but (in the modern sense at least) the same could be said of your "elite"-dropping.
Either language has meaning (and we're judged by it) or it is just space-consuming self-important spew without meaning. I've been judged to be a jack ass; I'll cop to that. But if anyone thought I was literally a jack ass then they were actually doofuses.