This ads an interesting legal element should the dealer choose to sell the product, knowing the added potential for harm. Or maybe it doesn't, I'm not a lawyer.
"This ads an interesting legal element should the dealer get caught selling the product, knowing the added potential for harm. Or maybe it doesn't, I'm not a lawyer."
fixed that for you. I can't assume there's refunds in this game, and I can't imagine some street-level dealer is going to toss a grand or so.
Call me crazy, but I still can't shake the idea that this could be a radical new drug policy enacted by a US agency abroad- think about it: convince South American drug cartels to start cutting product with Levamisole under the guise of increasing profits, which eventually will scare US customers away from the drug supply. Eventually all the cocaine users are either scared off the stuff or dead, and demand dries up- which is a win/win/win when all you care about is enforcing drug policy.
@4 - I didn't mean consumer protection-wise, I meant "we busted you selling coke, and now we're gonna try and prove you knew it was coke that had way more of a chance of killing (or did kill) your buyers than they bargained for."
I'm sure the "busted selling coke" part is enough for some prosecutors, but I wonder if one would explore this angle as well.
So is there here say of anyone marketin coke (at a increased price point, naturally) as tested and clean? Pay more for the piece of mind and to cover costs of what had to be flushed?)
I don't use coke or even live in WA anymore but the adaptations of the free est market is interesting.
@4: of course. the government poisoned bootleg liquor during prohibition. it's how my great uncle george died. it's a very believable theory, don't you think, brendan?
"And to preempt the people-should-just-stop-using-drugs argument—go ask Nancy Reagan how much the US spent on its D.A.R.E. and "Just Say No" campaigns. Then ask her why we still have so many drug users...."
Or how about we just ask the prohibitionist puritans what the fuck is so wrong with using drugs now and then? (Booze included.)
fixed that for you. I can't assume there's refunds in this game, and I can't imagine some street-level dealer is going to toss a grand or so.
I'm sure the "busted selling coke" part is enough for some prosecutors, but I wonder if one would explore this angle as well.
I don't use coke or even live in WA anymore but the adaptations of the free est market is interesting.
(Not really. Drugs are bad, m'kay?)
Or how about we just ask the prohibitionist puritans what the fuck is so wrong with using drugs now and then? (Booze included.)
I think the hipsters Billy Mays and Andrew Breitbart would take issue with your assumption.