The Importance of Having a Gay Columnist on the Opinion Pages of the New York Times

Comments

excellent.

because it is all about the buttfucking.

but a gay columnist barely scratches the surface.

we need a lesbian. WE DEMAND A LESBIAN.

add Trans. and whatever letters there are in GLTBxyzzzz.....

on December 11, 2012 at 9:28 AM

The nativity is a myth. Shot fired!

Pope Peabrain on December 11, 2012 at 9:29 AM

Hear, hear. Without Bruni we gays of a certain age would be bereft of nationally-credible punditry studded with Judy and Barbra references. Thank gawd for Frank. (Srsly, that DOMA column was just beautifully done - thanks for linking to it.)

gloomy gus on December 11, 2012 at 9:36 AM

I just read both columns, and they were both beautifully written.

The difference between someone like Bruni and someone like Michelle Malkin: both will have their detractors, but it would be hard to deny the intelligence and substance of Bruni's remarks.

Clayton on December 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM

I'm a regular old straight guy and the fact that Scalia and Thomas get to decide rights for other human beings frightens and offends me.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/i-get-t…

DrSlipnSlide on December 11, 2012 at 10:38 AM

What was hugely important was Bruni's horrendous reporting on W for the New York Times in 2000.

cgd on December 11, 2012 at 10:57 AM

Hey, here's a thought. How about a lesbian columnist?

Jane Eaton Hamilton on December 11, 2012 at 5:49 PM