I think the statement would work better as "a subset of white males against everyone else", so that's it's clear there are plenty of white males on both sides. I still don't agree, insofar as a sizable proportion of Republican voters are female, even if the leadership is male, though the past against the future is apt.
Way to marginalize everybody white and male, most of whom AREN'T sociopathic dickbags. If only there was some historical precedent that could inform us all about the dangers of stereotyping people based on gender and skin color...
@1: Agreed. The GOP as it is today is a party of a particular group of white males - and white females - that share little with people like me apart from skin color and, possibly, some life experiences associated with that skin color. In fact, at least here in the Northeast, I'd say I know slightly more conservative women than men, although the count of either is pretty negligible.
While we all know what the troll's ugly agenda is, and it is not one worth paying attention to, it does seem just a tad hypocritical for you, Charles, to call somebody else out for a non-sequitur, Mister King of the Non-sequiturs.
Must be tough being a liberal, everywhere you go, constantly checking out everyones race, assessing their gender and being sure everyone is happy with their testicles/vaginas.
It's like having a stick permanently rooted up your ass.
it's illogical gibberish.
Except the Adam Lanza's in America are outliers, less than 0.1% of all gun deaths in the US, whereas the Ja'Mari's are 50% of all gun deaths.
It's like having a stick permanently rooted up your ass.