Comments

1
Ed Murray can do no right in your eyes, can he?
2
It may be somewhat symbolic since the city is already quite a good employer, but it does set the bar for city jobs. People will now know they can get $15/hour at the city so they are going to wonder why other employers are shortchanging them.
3
I wonder how those already making $15 an hour will react when people in lower-level jobs start getting the same salary. My guess is there will have to be some adjustments to be fair to those people.

Not saying that's a bad thing, just pointing out that eventually this will likely cost more than you're projecting.
4
Jesus, Goldy. I love you, but let's be appropriately happy about this.

It's a message, and a great one. It says the city stands behind this idea. This "small step" bullshit is ridiculous - it's clearly not meant to be anything BUT a message and is literally all he can do via executive order.

HAPPY TIMES, GOLDY. HAPPY.
5
Do the Stranger's unpaid interns not deserve a living wage?

Will the Stranger adopt the $15 minimum wage and only use suppliers & printers who do the same?

Change starts at home kids.
6
This sucks. I was about to start my own city government in Seattle and employ a bunch of civil servants, but now this new minimum wage will prevent me from expanding the government and probably cause it to go into receivership.
7
@5 - You need to update your screed. They haven't had unpaid interns for a long time now. The rest of your copypasta has a legitimate point, but it really doesn't need to be made in every single thread about minimum wage.
8
Kshama Sawant's new minimum wage campaign website—15now.org
pure nickpickery (or...is...it?) but that website belongs to one "Calvin Priest" of/or-about: "232 Belmont Ave E" and not Ms Sawant per-se (if you will)

in anycase, well done Mayor Murray!
9
This is fantastic. Way to go, Mayor Murray!
10
@1 What would you prefer? A blow job? I reported it for what it is: a fulfilled campaign promise and a welcome but small first step. Did I mischaracterize this?
11
Hey, if Murray wanted quick, evenhanded Slog coverage he'd have had Sawant at the presser. He knows the rules.
12
At least it's an action, albeit small. Actions are preferable to words here.
13
@11 This was evenhanded coverage. That's clearly not what some in the comment thread are demanding.
14
Come on. This barely counts for anything. Get back to me with flowers and balloons when Murray proposes to raise the minimum wage in the entire city to $15 in one year, not five.
15
By my reckoning, this makes Kshama Sawant the most effective council member in Seattle's history. Has she even been sworn in yet?
16
@13, dammit, I meant to change "evenhanded" to "effusive" but my mouse, she clicks so fast!
17
It's funny because those Seattle Center employees are not guaranteed $15/hr by contract when/if they work for Hansen's new arena.
18
Does this proposal include on-call workers? Or just permanent part time and full time?
19
When is the Port of Seattle raising the minimum wage in Seattle and Sea-Tac airport to $15/hour?
20
@15 it's Monday at 3:30
21
@7 Where did you get this news that the Stranger no longer uses unpaid interns. They were still laughingly using the moniker "Unpaid Intern" right up until the recent court ruling that said unpaid internship were exploitive and illegal, and an increasing number of readers started giving the Stranger shit about this practice. But as far as I know, all the Stranger did was stop using "Unpaid Intern" for slog posts. How do you know they are indeed paying their interns now?
22
@21 - The last dozen or so times this was brought up, it has been answered. Afraid I don't have a link, but if the staffers aren't tired of answering the question, maybe they can shed more light on the issue.
23
I hope Ms. Sawant runs for mayor in four years. Clearly, she is the one setting the agenda while the already hapless Murray follows along.
24
@21 We have paid apprentices.
26
I recently wrote an article about how an increase in the minimum wage rate increases unemployment. You can read it here: http://wp.me/p3N9zD-4e
27
@26- why would anyone want to read your fascist, anti-worker, let-them-eat-cake-trickle-down-objectivist-Randian bullshit musings?
If any one wants that, they can watch FAUX news.
28
@26 i skimmed your blog post and didn't see a single citation, fact, or shred of evidence. So why the hell should we take your word for it?
29
...This just in...Murray cures cancer...Goldy reports, sure but Murray does nothing for all of those who are cancer-free...in more important news, Sawant has a website!...
30
So, we'll hyperventilate to praise the SeaTac $15 min wage law that would cover a worker population of about 6,300 workers but if Ed Murray enacts a min wage of $15 for city workers (10,000 of them) it's a big yawn at the Stranger HQ.
31
I don't like the tendency for the public sector to pay a large premium vs. private sector employers. Public sector services are often labor intensive and often some of the most important services. Their potential amplitude is circumscribed (if only modestly, in this case) by the upward secular trend in their unit costs.
32
@7,

You're expecting a troll to drop its chew toy?
33
@8 since the website promotes Kshwama almost as much as the $15 min wage, it would look too self serving if it were registered in her name.
34
Alright Goldy, so the mayor makes a huge statement saying all gov't workers get 15 bucks, which you say is nothing, and the councilermember makes website which you think is a big deal....yeah you're not biased at all...
35
Let me restate this in Goldy logic. The Mayor got 600 people $15 dollars an hour, which is small and OMG we hate the mayor. Sawant got no one $15 dollars an hour, but yay we love Sawant!
36
Fuck off, Goldy. And I am going to be so, so happy to see you defeated in the primaries.
37
@34 - Where did Goldy say it was "nothing"? It seems like he was giving praise to Murray for following through on a campaign promise while recognizing that said promise only impacts 6% of the city's workforce. In that context, 6% is a small step forward. Unless you want to argue that 6% is nothing or it's a huge number, you're full of shit.
38
@34 - Actually, let's just go with you're full of shit.
39
@38 glad you can focus on one word and miss the whole intent of my comment, you and goldy make a good pair
40
For example am argument could be made that a website is a very small step, but no Goldy didn't chose to make that argument.
.so yeah if goldy going to constantly rim sawant the least he can do is give Murry a rough tug job.
41
@39,40 - Why is your comment history hidden?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.