Comments

1
Some people (especially people REALLY good at math) have too much time on their hands.
2
And now my head hurts. So many more people, so much more stuff.

Damn those math people!
3
Math nerd here. It's not n!. (Try it with 4 people.) It's n*(n-1) not including self relationships.
4
Fortunately it only works out this way (I hope) if two hysterical drama queens (of whatever sex) get mixed up with a third hysterical drama queen (of whatever sex). In real life, I would think you're more likely to end up with:
-- one partner (the one whose idea it was) being happier than before;
-- one partner (the one they talked into it) with conflicting feelings that may eventually resolve in one direction or another (i.e. they'll decide they like it or they'll decide they don't), and
-- the third, who is a wild card. (Did they get into this relationship because they have a crush on Partner A and are putting up with Partner B as the price of admission? Or because they like 3somes? Or, or, or.)
5
Hold on. There's a HUGE assumption behind these maths:

We're only counting relationships "inside" the bubble and ignoring everything outside: friends, family, work. If you assign any value at all to these other relationships, then those equations fall apart.

It's not about how *many* populate your bed, but how *respectfully* and *honestly* you deal with all who populate your life.

6
What about masturbation? That adds an additional factor for each of the three people.
7
It must be those big eyes that give you such insight, Dr. Forka. XD
8
As much as the math makes my head-spin I think the LW are bringing up a good point about adding another person to a relationship. Mainly that it's complicated and not some magic cure-all for relationship issues.

I think Dan tends to overlook this.
9
Can't believe no one wrote in about the more basic math error. When you go from 2 to 3, that's not an increase of 33%, it's an increase of 50%.
10
While adding people to fix a problem is generally a terrible idea, sometimes adding another relationship creates a stabilizing force that decreases overall drama for all involved. Here's a simple example without romantic relationships involved. I used to live in a large household of friends. We had only one extrovert in the group though. That extrovert was a really useful addition, because he was willing to accept always being the one to pick up the phone or answer the door or call places to place orders for delivery - tasks most of the rest of us hated. But having a house extrovert allowed the rest of us to avoid strangers during our at-home relaxing time, while still having various options and things dealt with. Similarly, sometimes another relationship fills a gap really well, being willing to do things with the other people that they are each separately interested in, but don't have overlap with each other - thus making both people happier.

Sure, every relationship you have is a potential source of drama and problems. But it's also a potential source of emotional comfort and stability, a potential source of entertainment and cheer, a potential source of skills and advice. There;s a reason that people sometimes collaborate - other people can be useful and pleasant sometimes.
11
@3: that was what I was going to say.
12
@3: Yes, it is twice the (N-1)th triangular number (if you count A's relationship to B separately from counting B's relationship with A) which is N * (N-1) or "2 x N-1 Choose 2" for those familiar with combinatorial calculations.

1: 0 = 1x0
2: 2 = 2x1
3: 6 = 3x2
4: 12 = 4x3
5: 20 = 5x4
6: 30 = 6x5

All of which is why Dan goes to so many poly weddings but no poly 5th anniversaries.
13
@12 Funny, I know of poly relationships past the five year mark.
14
@7,
You know what they say about a man with big eyes...
15
@3 & @12 -- Thank you.

If I ever learn calculus, can we three get into some kind of hyper-polynomial addition/subtraction kind of relationship?
16
I agree #10. I should've said that sometimes opening a relationship can save it and adding another person can be a boon instead of a drama-bomb.
17
@15: Probability, logic, and statistics are far more useful in daily life (and most every profession) than Calculus.

I coach competitive math and I'm now imaging a whole range of questions - totally inappropriate for school-age children - involving X partners, Y orifices, and Z appendages and how many combinations are possible.
18
@14 No, what is it they say ?
19
@14, 18: Small stomachs?
20
One relevant statistic seems to be the chance of having a good time sexually with a new person. If her vetting approach leaves her satisfied with most of her lovers, as it has with this guy, she can expect the same success if she vets the new woman. Or establishes mutual attraction and sanity or what have you. Dan did gloss over the intimacy with another relationship. It would be wise in this case to take an interest in the couple's stability to estimate the chance of being drawn into their relationship problems.
21
@18,19,

Big glasses. Duh.
22
@21 Got it this time.
23
Wow. Am I the only person who didn't think the math was at all confusing?

It's just saying that adding a third person means both partners have some kind of individual relationship to that third person, and to the way their partner relates to that person, and that person will have feelings about the first partner, the second partner, and about the way those other two interact.
24
I stopped reading when my head started hurting.
25
LW1 - I disagree with the 150%. Feelings about the relationship as a whole are not independent from feelings about the individuals. I would find it easier to argue the opposite.

LW2 - I believe you were confusing n!=n*(n-1)...*1 and n+(n-1) .. +1=n(n+1)/2. The latter can be used here.

I also dislike decorative statistics, a stats editor would be cool.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.