@1 I agree with your sentiment, but find the latter part of the article more interesting (if too focused on someone of diminishing cultural impact). Much has been written on the fracturing of culture, but there is still something interesting about the business of mass media (of a sort that requires real investment) with a nearly instantaneous global reach and a narrow, localized audience.
What #1 and #6 said. Sarah can always count on the left to give her air time. It's better than putting energy towards elected officials they enforced who aren't doing their jobs. But that's what the other side does too, so what the hell.
@3 has a favorite phrase of mine. You see, I'm more interested in diversity and equality than most people, therefore I can write a lengthy argument that all of us, all of us are eating ourselves.
@ 6/8, she's getting more than left wing coverage of yhis. Loke it or not, it's news, and if you still think ignoring them makes them go away (as we've been repeatedly admonished to do ever since Rush Limbaugh became a household word), the last 20 odd years have not been as instructional for you as they could have been.
Sarah Palin is a media whore not unlike Terry Jones (Koran burner), Mike Huckster. She had 15 minutes of fame and we're coming up on 17 minutes. It's time to go Trig mama.
As soon as I read your statement "She's nothing, a nobody" I stopped reading your post.
So why are you giving her so much ink?
Watching the Republican party eat itself is one of my favorite guilty pleasures.