Kristine Marsh accuses Dan of "equating Rick Santorum’s name with a lewd sexual joke." (My italics.)
Firstly, who ever heard of a 'tasteful' sexual joke? What would be the point?
Secondly, Dan didn't liken Santorum's name unto an existing joke. He literally redefined "Santorum" using a brilliantly designed crowdsourcing exercise.
Just wondering if any of the rightwing nut jobs will mention that ben Carson likened Obama and the current US as being like Germany under Hitler, the Nazi's and the Gestapo. As I recall, 13 million people were murdered by Hitler et al. The oppressed Carson is running for president, has not had one of his asinine statements censored, not will the government kill him, instead, he will receive free protection as long as he is a serious candidate for president. There is not a single Republican candidate who has denounced Carson. Who supports equality.
I choose to engage in a particular sex act or not. I do not choose my sexuality nor my perversions and fetishes. But why should gay folk not thace the same choices that straight people enjoy. Does not Dr Carson see how his choice to believe in a book of fables composed 2000 to 300 years ago by illiterate nomads with nary a scintilla of evidence of the stories told therein is protected by law? That is not immutable. That is his choice.
We are all Americans. We should all have the same rights.
When I read "sir - your total scum," I keep thinking of john, wearing his male chastity device, in the dark part of the dungeon... I need to stop before my co-workers wonder what I'm giggling about and/or need to rub one out in the shared bathroom...
So, my question is - did John ever figure out what Dan was getting at, with the corrections to his spelling? Or did he just think his epithets were being thrown back at him?
Also, the expression “hoist with his own petard” means “blown into the air by his own bomb.” One does not hoist oneself onto a petard, one’s own or another’s.
It's so hard to even address the stupidity of John's comments when I so desperately want to correct all of his grammarian nonsense and tell him he has to rewrite his paper. I thank Dan and the commenters here, whose replies have been the most hilarious part of my day.
Sending you loving words, to counteract the damage done.
Are you just going to let anyone be your scum now?
Maybe you just had squid ink pasta.
You'res truly.
Also, "Black Santorum" would be a great name for a death metal band.
Firstly, who ever heard of a 'tasteful' sexual joke? What would be the point?
Secondly, Dan didn't liken Santorum's name unto an existing joke. He literally redefined "Santorum" using a brilliantly designed crowdsourcing exercise.
I choose to engage in a particular sex act or not. I do not choose my sexuality nor my perversions and fetishes. But why should gay folk not thace the same choices that straight people enjoy. Does not Dr Carson see how his choice to believe in a book of fables composed 2000 to 300 years ago by illiterate nomads with nary a scintilla of evidence of the stories told therein is protected by law? That is not immutable. That is his choice.
We are all Americans. We should all have the same rights.
Oh, dear.
(see also: Houses, Glass)
(or: Petards, Hoisting One's Self Upon One's Own)
Also, the expression “hoist with his own petard” means “blown into the air by his own bomb.” One does not hoist oneself onto a petard, one’s own or another’s.
I guess a general (but not academic) knowledge of Dungeons & Dragons was no substitute for a proper education.
Write out a hundred times....