Yeah, this is totally better than reading Paul Constant, Cienna Madrid, Anna Minard, and Goldy on Slog. Totally.

Lol , good @1

@1: tou-fucking-che!!

@1: Paul was boring, and Anna had no talent for writing.

I do miss Cienna and Goldy though.

Instead of spending time on a podcast that few people will listen to, maybe we could get more actual written coverage of current events?

The biggest complaint that the departed staffers have is that they were stretched too thin... do you really think it makes sense to add ANOTHER thing for your staff to do?

This is kind of like the thing on KUOW on Friday mornings, right? But with more swearing I suppose

(Didn't mean that in a negative way)

I liked this program okay. Like lots of folks, I try to keep up with local news but my time seems to be ever more limited, so a summary podcast serves a useful function. That said, this would be a MUCH better program if a single person on the panel had a different opinion on ANY topic. 40 minutes of people agreeing with each other doesn't exactly make for compelling radio. Maybe in the future you could invite some voices of dissent? Some clever thinkers from a conservative school like Seattle U? Or one of the more agreeable voices from conservative talk radio? Wouldn't it be more fun to hear Charles Mudede really go at it with a conservative economist?

Is there any way to download this rather than stream?