Slog
Jul 10, 2015 11:44 AM
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Comments
And Jeb has made his Romneyesque 47% statement.
The fix is in:
http://static.rogerebert.com/uploads/rev…
This guy is three bricks shy of a load.
But practical fusion reactors and photovoltaic performance breakthroughs are kinda out of the garage league.
Thankfully, these politicians are blessed with a brain that allows them to promote the destruction of the very vision they embrace.
ask me again, and i'll tell you another. it's from the Hebrews chapter 3:19? 17:2? i can look it up
The team I worked with measured soil temperatures and fertility conditions of the soil prior to logging. Our research was on track to prove that the long term effect of the common practices of aggressive stripping of all vegetation from the logged areas resulted in the long term damage and potential collapse of the ecosystem of the affected area.
We also found that the soil temperature of the deforested area sky rocketed. In every test area, once the moisture of the soil was burned off by direct solar radiation the soil acted as a reflector and heated the atmosphere directly above the deforested region. The specialist's report indicated that wide spread deforestation could adversely affect weather patterns in any region of widespread deforestation and could potentially create drought conditions. The soils condition project was swiftly terminated and all of our records were confiscated.
whatever jackass they pick will get steamrolled next year. I feel sorry for all of us who have to sit through this year-long puppet show.
-stop puting carbon in the atmosphere would be #1
- position a shade structure to Earth's L1
Gotta plenty more.
(P.S. to Venomlash - my bad on our last exchange.)
Global warming is the biggest overall threat to humanity since the Soviet Union and the U. S. had dozens of missiles aimed at each other (nuclear war is still a threat, just not as big of one). It is the worst possible crisis to handle for several reasons:
1) There is a lag period. By the time everyone realizes it is really bad, there is little you can do about it.
2) There is tragedy of the commons problem. It is great if everyone else solves the problem, and you can enjoy low fuel prices and have a great time.
3) There are a lot of causes (it isn't just fossil fuels).
4) It doesn't seem like an obvious threat. Losing a substantial number of the world's species sounds bad, but it isn't like someone blowing up a bomb in a crowded market. Except that they are linked. As global warming gets worse, resource shortages get worse. Resource shortages play a huge part in wars and civil unrest. Wars and civil unrest lead to ... guys blowing up bombs in a crowded market (and a lot worse). This is why the military is involved. Wander over to West Point and ask to talk to a few professors about global warming -- they will scare the shit out of you.
I suppose the only way to save this thing is for all humans to be exterminated by the end of the decade. That's the only way to give true credence to the hype, which so many take a smug delight in dishing out.
Cluck on, Chicken Little.
But I do feel that it is important for all of us to face our fears and acknowledge what's happening to our planet and our species. Perhaps Seattleblahs will come to that conclusion as well, but I'm not counting on it. I think he had a sibling who used to push on his on fontanelle, or maybe Mother drank a bit while carrying him. It can't just be chronic overwhelming loneliness that's made him what he is.
Ok, freakshow. Whatever.
@38: "I know nothing about this issue, but I feel that I am more qualified to make declarations than the thousands of people who spend decades of their lives studying it! Why? Because I can think of a reason that they might all be in cahoots lying to us about the issue for their own imaginary profit! Also, I'm too uneducated to understand the current science, so I think it's counter-intuitive."
Basically your attitude on the climate change issue, given your lack of a geoscie background, your refusal to educate yourself on the issue, and your persistent failure to cite any supporting evidence to back up your positions.
@40: You call CVDR a freakshow, and yet you're the one who masochistically returns to a website full of people who don't like you, to make posts nobody takes seriously on topics of which you know very little. Just admit and accept that you have some deep-seated need for punishment; I've got my own masochistic tendencies, and I've come to terms with them.
A much more easily remedied problem, admittedly, but I’m working too many hours so that Jeb Bush can get richer and I’m not finding the time to get to the store for the appropriate piss collection paraphernalia. Would you invent something to help me with that?