Yikes. I'm for free speech of all kinds but with the history of black men being lynched for "raping" white women (i.e. white men reacting poorly to having their virility threatened) that seems like it could get dangerous.
"Cockservative"? My first thought was/is that it refers to a conservative who likes cock. As in Raindrop is a cockservative. Or at worst it'd refer to some conservative anti-gay guy trolling for cock in an airport restroom.
I fail to see how it could possibly refer to women at all, regardless of race or nationality. Conservatives are so fucked up they can't even do slang right.
Terms like that just illustrate the basic insecurity of white male conservatives. If you disagree with the party line, you're not a manly man exhibiting strong strength promoting growth to support your faithful family. And security. And faith. Did I mention strength?
P.S. I occasionally voice small disagreements with you guys, but no one here has ever called me a 'cuckliberal' or the like. I appreciate that we have a higher level of discourse.
That the conservatives are spending time thinking about cuckolding (not that there is anything wrong with it) says a lot about what conservatives actually care about. In my experience, people who think a lot about a subject are either actively engaged in that subject, or they want to be engaged with it. For example, the conservatives who complain the most about homosexuality are the ones most likely to be caught looking for a quickie in the men's room of an airport (not that there is anything wrong with that.)
Maybe conservatives feel an erotic charge from engaging in activities that, during the light of day, they demonize. Perhaps the demonization is actually key to making the activity more forbidden and therefore "hotter." This just doesn't happen with sex. Some of the biggest drinkers are the very people who preach against it on Sunday morning.
chi_type: you say there's a history of black men being lynched for raping white women without considering whether there is actually any supporting evidence of their contention, then chalk it all up to a white fear of having their virility challenged.
The facts:
Between blacks and whites (from 2003-2008), blacks have statistically committed 100% of the sexual assaults against white women. No, that's not a exaggeration:
Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
Black on White: 20,309
Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
There goes your "virility" nonsense right into the trash. No one agrees with lynching people, but the statistics clearly demonstrate that their fears of white women being raped by blacks were not unfounded, but completely justified given the statistics on interracial rape. Not only that but black men are only around 7% of the population yet commit around 33% of all rapes (FBI criminal stats), making them significantly overrepresented in this category of crime.
@18: Sauce or it's bullshit. Also, the (unsourced) numbers you posted don't actually support your claim that "blacks have statistically committed 100% of the sexual assaults against white women". You're saying that every single time a white woman is raped, the rapist is never anything other than black.
Back to Stormfront with you. Get a brain, morans!
@18, when chi_type refers to the history of black men being lynched for having sex with white women, s/he is talking about the lynchings that occurred primarily in the South (although in other places, too) from the days of slavery up to the 1960's and 70's. Perhaps you slept through that part of history class or maybe the district you attended decided not to teach it?
Race play does do well in the South, but at least there's some possibility of consensual fun between those into that fetish. Entering the conservative mainstream? That's 100% creeps.
Dan, do you understand what is going to happen to gay rights in the US when the US becomes dominated by a black / third world immigrant coalition? Can you honestly tell me how blacks feel about the idea of gay rights? How are gays regarded in Mexico? You really think that the new Democratic coalition, which is a team of blacks and various immigrant groups, is ok with gay? You're an intelligent guy. Grow a pair and ask some hard questions about your new Democratic allies from El Salvador, Haiti, poor villages in Mexico, Somalia, and all the other places that are dumping their unwanted and unemployable on us.
@29: "Boo! Scary racial minorities coming from places with ingrained homophobia! Totally scarier than the white religious conservatives actively trying to ingrain homophobia on our fair shores!"
Hey, if white Anglo people are so gay-friendly, why isn't the GOP pushing for gay rights? And what exactly that you think gay activists should push for to prevent your alleged catastrophe? Should we adopt a racist and xenophobic immigration policy like Australia used to have?
Not that you care about the truth, as you obviously confuse the fiction presented to you by the mass media as truth
But here are the sources from the Department of Justice, not from some Hollywood movie, or some fiction book that your teacher asked you to read about how evil whitie accused poor blackie but blackie dindu nuffin, which seems where leftists seem to take their believes, for anyone interested in what is going on in the real world
@30 Yeah, scary (very high crime rate) minorities are coming from places with ingrained homophobia. If you can't tell the difference between homophobia in Somalia and homophobia in Northern Europe, you're not being honest with yourself. Yes I know that you can go into a Lutheran church somewhere in Germany and hear the preacher say that "homosexuality is a sin", and you'll hear the same message at a mosque in Somalia. The words are the same, but have some courage and honesty and tell me, is a gay person likely safer in a crowd of Somalis or a crowd of Anglo people? And yes, I think we should adopt a xenophobic policy like Australia used to have, and any honest and sane gay person would agree with me. Saying that, from a gay rights point of view, Anglo people are no different from Somalis, Haitians and Oaxacans is just insane. Come on, someone have some honesty here and address reality. Or is that impossible on this site?
Dan, if you want to see how our third world immigrants really feel about gay people, do a search youtube for EAT DA POO POO. Yes, exactly like that, and you'll see how much warm feelings Africans have for your bedroom freedom. Every country in Africa has harsh criminal penalties for homosexuality, up to and including life in prison and the death sentence. Gays are summarily lynched in many / most African countries. All of you saying that white conservatives are racist, and we should allow mass third world immigration, because, hey, some bible thumpers also say mean things about gays, you're all delusional, and deep down inside you know I'm right. You know that gays are safest in white countries and are not safe in just about any third world village, and once our country becomes dominated by third world villagers, gays won't be safe here either.
You all know this is true deep down inside and you hate it.
Dan, I'll coin a new word for you. You're a Cuckocrat. It's a gay or Jewish Democrat who believes that third world immigrants and American blacks are BFFs for gays and Jews. There are Jewish pro-immigrant activits in Sweden demanding a flood of Muslims from Syria. They're Cuckocrats. There are gays who think they are on the same team as black gang members. They're Cuckocrats.
No need to apologize Dan. You can't be held responsible for other people misappropriating the word. In fact, you efforts will be more important now to mak clear to people that fetish cuckolding is not necessarily interracial and often has zero to do with racial baggage.
I'm sure the writer loved calling the Tea Party supporters teabaggers. But cuckservative is just too profane. What a joke. The reason liberals and Jews hate the term is that it might click with White Americans that their nation is being taken away from them.
My name is Nataly. While working on research of some linguistic tools, I come across your page "Word of the day". This is noticeable heading and I took an interest in this! Your page contains a really clever description and meaning of the word - it's a great post and I want to say thanks for it! Also, I want to suggest one more link to a definition dictionary which I use frequently (Apart from definitions it provides rhymes, quotes and idioms). It's not big, but an evolving project and you may use it for quick access to any word. I think that you already use great dictionaries, so using www.dictionary.net would probably be a good new opportunity for you and your visitors to find a little more information.
Hope this helps your vocabulary.
Exactly, bloody awful. To boot, I have the image of Dan taking a shower. Sickness all around..
Is that a shower with or without Mr Miller?
Pertinent to imagine it till @4 set me free.
Men and showers.
Impertinent, Venn, is what I meant.
I fail to see how it could possibly refer to women at all, regardless of race or nationality. Conservatives are so fucked up they can't even do slang right.
P.S. I occasionally voice small disagreements with you guys, but no one here has ever called me a 'cuckliberal' or the like. I appreciate that we have a higher level of discourse.
Maybe conservatives feel an erotic charge from engaging in activities that, during the light of day, they demonize. Perhaps the demonization is actually key to making the activity more forbidden and therefore "hotter." This just doesn't happen with sex. Some of the biggest drinkers are the very people who preach against it on Sunday morning.
The facts:
Between blacks and whites (from 2003-2008), blacks have statistically committed 100% of the sexual assaults against white women. No, that's not a exaggeration:
Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
Black on White: 20,309
Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
There goes your "virility" nonsense right into the trash. No one agrees with lynching people, but the statistics clearly demonstrate that their fears of white women being raped by blacks were not unfounded, but completely justified given the statistics on interracial rape. Not only that but black men are only around 7% of the population yet commit around 33% of all rapes (FBI criminal stats), making them significantly overrepresented in this category of crime.
Back to Stormfront with you. Get a brain, morans!
Wow.
Those dirty boys. Using Cuck is interesting. They just want to play in your/ our world , Dan. Too shy to ask up front.
Hey, if white Anglo people are so gay-friendly, why isn't the GOP pushing for gay rights? And what exactly that you think gay activists should push for to prevent your alleged catastrophe? Should we adopt a racist and xenophobic immigration policy like Australia used to have?
Not that you care about the truth, as you obviously confuse the fiction presented to you by the mass media as truth
But here are the sources from the Department of Justice, not from some Hollywood movie, or some fiction book that your teacher asked you to read about how evil whitie accused poor blackie but blackie dindu nuffin, which seems where leftists seem to take their believes, for anyone interested in what is going on in the real world
Sources on interracial rape:
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0…
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0…
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0…
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0…
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0…
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0…
You all know this is true deep down inside and you hate it.
My name is Nataly. While working on research of some linguistic tools, I come across your page "Word of the day". This is noticeable heading and I took an interest in this! Your page contains a really clever description and meaning of the word - it's a great post and I want to say thanks for it! Also, I want to suggest one more link to a definition dictionary which I use frequently (Apart from definitions it provides rhymes, quotes and idioms). It's not big, but an evolving project and you may use it for quick access to any word. I think that you already use great dictionaries, so using www.dictionary.net would probably be a good new opportunity for you and your visitors to find a little more information.
Hope this helps your vocabulary.
Sincerely,