Comments

1
Notice when the tea party and their enablers and appeasers say LIBERTY, it always mean oppression for someone else.
2
This KKKountry is gonna implode after the next domestic terrah attack causes all of the elderly, far white, racist nutjobs to soak their Depends and demand total fascism in the name of Freedumb. These assholes are so stupid, they don't even know that they're stupid.
3
Trump won't be the nominee, it'll be Rubio. BTW your coronated Queen Bitch isn't doing so hot in battleground polls. Less than a year. Tick tock tick tock tick tock...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/…
4
@3: I would dial "won't" down to "is likely not" - if Trump makes it through the early primaries with a substantial delegate lead, he has a good chance of being the nominee.

Let's hope that a savvier and wiser Mitt Romney changes his mind and steps in to save the day. Otherwise, it will get very ugly and the Republican party will have severed its true conservative and constitutionalist principles and be like wilted tulips on a compost heap.
5
RITDMFOTP
6
@5: Don't be cute and coy - not everyone is aware of these Slog acronyms. Just say "Raindrop is the dumbest mother fucker on the planet." That wouldn't be that hard for you, would it?
7
@3 Thanks for the laugh. Romney didn't decide to not enter the 2016 race, he was told he wasn't wanted.
8
Deport this piece of shit and his bimbo immigrant wives.
9
@6: To be fair, you were the one that said, "Let's hope that a savvier and wiser Mitt Romney... steps in to save the day," a sentiment previously only echoed in a Bain Capital boardroom, prior to widespread firings, restructuring and liquidation.
10
@10: Yes I did say that. It will never happen. I said it to note how much in dire straits the party has become. As much as the party does not want to repeat an Adlai Stevenson, it does sound more plausible each week. The democrats should hope for a republicans to nominate a relatively seasoned mainstreamer in case Secretary Clinton, or maybe even Sen. Sanders, loses.

One thing for sure, we're seeing a change in republican party not seen the days of the Whigs.
11
@10 I assume you are referring to Adlai Stevenson II. who ran for President as a Democrat in 1952. To which I must respond, what point are you trying to make?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.